|
Justice is one of the greatest and most beautiful things next to life itself and the glorious principle of freedom.
This website is dedicated to bring some very despicable men to justice.
|
Open Defiance of Undertaking 5
If you have been victimize by any of these despicable men, Antonio A. Boada, Mark T. Williams or Roger Pitts-Tucker, go to "The Answer" and learn how you can join in a class action suit against them.
*************************************
Letter to the Solicitors Regulation Authority
October 2009
Dear [name redacted],
The following is a description of the Mr. Pitts-Tucker's offense in a nutshell. Everything boils down to a man who cannot be counted on to be honest or live up to the standards required of solicitors:
Probably, by far, the most important purpose of the Solicitors Regulation Authority is to protect the public and the profession from solicitors who are derelict or guilty of professional wrongdoing. Mr. Pitts-Tucker is definitely one of them. He is in open defiance of professional requirements because he knowingly has been in violation of his firms undertaking for over nine years. In spite of years of being asked and invited to do his duty, Mr. Pitts-Tucker has chosen to heartlessly rob and cheat me of what is rightfully mine. This is not only wrong, it is despicable, willful and in complete disregard of professional standards. He was to provide the confirmable documents that would prove irrefutably that the sellers (the Imperial Hohenzollern Family of Germany) actually sold all the rights of the feudal property as claimed in the conveyance documents. This promise would have provided me with a good and marketable title, because without the fulfillment of the undertaking, I am left completely empty handed. Bad title means no ownership especially for an incorporeal hereditament, because the property is abstract --- they are intangible rights. Without rock solid proof of title, there is no real possession or actual ownership. Hence, I was robbed of the property that I purchased. The undertaking was to fill this void or defect in the conveyance. It was to make the conveyance authentic and genuine instead of a sham.
If Mr. Pitts-Tucker stubbornly refuses to measure up, when confronted with this violation of his professional word, especially when that challenge comes directly from the Solicitors Regulation Authority, he will prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that he is unworthy of the status of being a guardian of the law, because he will not keep one of the most basis and fundamental of all conduct rules --- the binding promise of a lawful undertaking.
This breach of conduct is especially grievous for he had full knowledge that it would ruin me financial if he did not fulfill it, but having no conscience, he has ignored me and turned a deaf ear to all my efforts to invite honorable behavior. A broken promise is not small thing.
He was also informed by many numerous letters that I cannot get out of the financial hole he put me in unless he does what a reasonable, honorable, and prudent solicitor would do, that is, by doing his duty in regard to the undertaking.
Mr. Pitts-Tuckers substandard actions or behavior are repugnant. His rebellious attitude is that he can get away with anything. He stubbornly refuses to live up to the ideals that give solicitors respect, honor and admiration in the world. He obviously feels he is above all the rules. They only apply to others, not to himself. As such, he is a rogue --- a loose cannon who has no scruples about cheating another human being if he can get away with it. His attitude and behavior, as exhibited in the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, suggest he has not learned anything and feels no need to comply with professional rules unless they benefit him or he is forced to. He only fessed up to some minor, but disturbing things, which still reflects a compromised legal practice. But generally, he never acknowledged anything, but gave lame excuses for some extremely serious acts of misconduct. Dishonesty is so unbecoming a man of respect or principle. It is also dishonest to never acknowledge ones faults and live in denial or an unreal world where he can do anything he wants. He also got off extremely light, but is still appealing the decisions of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal for unknown reasons, which probably are unsubstantial or immaterial considering the massive and enormous amount of clear and compelling evidence presented against him.
The point is, no one in their right mind, under such circumstances being regulated and fined by the Tribunal, would continue to be in violation of another extremely serious act of misconduct (a breach of undertaking) unless there was something fundamentally wrong with him. His ongoing violation proves his unworthiness and the need for severe and permanent discipline unless he will right his wrongs and cleans up his act. In regard to the failure to fulfill the undertaking, the following quote from the first complaint still applies with equal weight:
What would satisfy this particular grievance is if Roger Pitts-Tucker would provide irrefutable proof that could be verified and confirmed that the transfer of the title was actually/truly conveyed by senior members of the Imperial and Royal House of Prussia through Antony Boada to me as claimed.
Years of open defiance proves, without reasonable doubt, that without SRA involvement, Mr. Pitts-Tucker will not ever comply. He will not do what is right, because he does not have what it takes inside to do so --- he does not have the inner decency, professionalism, integrity or even a healthy fear that would impel most people to do their lawful duty. He simply will not do so without powerful outside pressure. Unfortunately, his feet must be held to the fire. He must be forced or coerced to do what is right. He does not have what is takes to do it on his own.
Hence, if he refuses to do his part after being confronted by the Solicitors Regulations Authority, he should be brought before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal to strike him off the list of practitioners permanently. This is the common sense solution. No other course seems proper and right for one so defiant, unlawful and so unwilling to measure up and become a part of the great majority of solicitors who are truly honest and take their responsibilities seriously.
Sincerely yours,
Only if everyone makes complaints will something happen. Its like the saying, United we stand divided we fall. Only when the authorities see that hundreds have been robbed and cheated, will they put a priority on this case. Go to The Answer for more information.
|