Findings and Appeal

<body topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 marginheight=0 marginwidth=0> <table cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0 border=0><tr> <td valign="top" colspan=2 height=90 BGCOLOR="#006699" TEXT="#080000" background="1d0fd5a3.jpg"> <div> <FONT SIZE="5" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" ><B>Phoney Titles of Nobility: British Feudal Investments, Ltd. Exposed</B></FONT><B>    </B><B> |     </B><A HREF="index.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Phoney Titles of Nobility: British Feuda"><U><B>home</B></U></A></div> <div> </div> </td> </tr><tr> <td valign="top" width=210 BGCOLOR="#FFCC66" TEXT="#080000" background="1d1d2b03.jpg"> <div> <IMG SRC="157ae6c0.jpg" border=0 width="174" height="108" ALIGN="BOTTOM" HSPACE="0" VSPACE="0"></div> <div> <B>Justice is one of the greatest and most beautiful things next to life itself and the glorious principle of freedom.</B></div> <div> <B>This website is dedicated to bring some very despicable men to justice.</B></div> </td> <td valign="top" height=390 BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" TEXT="#080000"> <div> <B>Findings and Appeal</B></div> <div> <A HREF="index.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Phoney Titles of Nobility: British Feuda"><U>Home</U></A>  <FONT SIZE="4" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" >I </FONT><A HREF="id48.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="News"><U>News</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id47.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Summary of Theft"><U>Summary of Theft</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id54.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Boadas Foul and Deceitful Claim"><U>Boada's Foul and Deceitful Claim</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id55.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Core Issue"><U>Core Issue</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id58.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Answer"><U>The Answer</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id19.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Website1"><U>Website1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id20.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Website2"><U>Website2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id21.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Revealing Article"><U>Revealing Article</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Deceptions1"><U>Deceptions1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id25.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Deceptions2"><U>Deceptions2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id40.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Deceptions3"><U>Deceptions3</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada1a.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams1"><U>Scams1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id27.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams2"><U>Scams2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id29.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams3"><U>Scams3</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada___roger_pitts_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Proof of Fraud"><U>Proof of Fraud</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id34.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Accomplice1"><U>Accomplice1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id50.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Accomplice2"><U>Accomplice2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada26.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Fake Titles"><U>Fake Titles</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id45.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="New Discoveries1"><U>New Discoveries1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id51.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="New Discoveries2"><U>New Discoveries2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="roger_anthony_pitt_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor1"><U>Crooked Solicitor1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id46.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor2"><U>Crooked Solicitor2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id62.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor3"><U>Crooked Solicitor3</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id63.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor4"><U>Crooked Solicitor4</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id64.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor5"><U>Crooked Solicitor5</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id65.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor6"><U>Crooked Solicitor6</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id67.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor7"><U>Crooked Solicitor7</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id66.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor8"><U>Crooked Solicitor8</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id68.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor9"><U>Crooked Solicitor9</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id69.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor10"><U>Crooked Solicitor10</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id70.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor11"><U>Crooked Solicitor11</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id71.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor12"><U>Crooked Solicitor12</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id72.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor13"><U>Crooked Solicitor13</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id73.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor14"><U>Crooked Solicitor14</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id74.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor15"><U>Crooked Solicitor15</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id75.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor16"><U>Crooked Solicitor16</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id76.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor 17"><U>Crooked Solicitor 17</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id77.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor18"><U>Crooked Solicitor18</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id78.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor19"><U>Crooked Solicitor19</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id79.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor 20"><U>Crooked Solicitor 20</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id80.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor 21"><U>Crooked Solicitor 21</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id81.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 1"><U>Open Defiance of Undertaking 1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id82.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 2"><U>Open Defiance of Undertaking 2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id83.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 3"><U>Open Defiance of Undertaking 3</U></A>   |   <B>Findings and Appeal</B>   |   <A HREF="id86.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 4"><U>Open Defiance of Undertaking 4</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id87.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 5"><U>Open Defiance of Undertaking 5</U></A>   |   <A HREF="irish_and_english_baronies.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Selling the Forbidden"><U>Selling the Forbidden</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada___roger_pitts_tucker24.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Challenge"><U>The Challenge</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id60.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Declaration of Ownership"><U>Declaration of Ownership</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id57.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Diversion Tactics"><U>Diversion Tactics</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id42.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Reactions"><U>Reactions</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id33.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Disclaimer"><U>Disclaimer</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id23.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Contact "><U>Contact </U></A>   |   <A HREF="id44.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Index"><U>Index</U></A></div> <bR> <div> <B>If you have been victimize by any of these despicable men, Antonio A. Boada, Mark T. Williams or Roger Pitts-Tucker, go to "</B><A HREF="id58.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Answer"><U><B>The Answer</B></U></A><B>" and learn how you can join in a class action suit against them.</B></div> <div> <B> </B></div> <div> <B>*************************************</B></div> <div> <B>Summary of Findings of the November 2008 Tribunal</B></div> <bR> <div> The following is a summary published by <B>The International Commission on Nobility and Royalty (</B><FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><B><U>http://www.nobility-royalty.com/id64.htm</U></B></FONT><B>)</B></div> <bR> <DIV ALIGN="LEFT"></DIV> <div> <B>Tribunal Findings</B></div> <bR> <div> The findings on Roger A. Pitts-Tucker finally came out in late August of 2009. The following is a brief review of the 47 page findings of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal of England and Wales, which took place in London from November 18th to the 1st of December, 2008. (See: <FONT SIZE="4" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><B><U>www.sra.org.uk/documents/consumers/SDT/2009/Aug/pitts-tucker-9722.07.pdf</U></B></FONT>) The Tribunal was not asked to and therefore did not make the determination if the 13 transactions considered were fraudulent conveyances. However, the Tribunal found that the Allegations 1.1(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h), most of 1.2, most of 1.5, 1.6, 1.7 and Allegation 2 were substantiated. </div> <bR> <div> The Tribunal found that the 13 feudal title transactions presented were dubious and did, in fact, “<B>bear the indicators of possible fraud</B>” and the Tribunal found that the Respondent, Mr. Pitts-Tucker, knew this to be the case and therefore acted willfully.</div> <bR> <div> He also knew that his client had involved him as a solicitor to lend credibility to the client and the transactions and that he should have know that he was assisting his client in taking unfair advantage of the other party to the transactions. </div> <bR> <div> Mr. Pitts-Tucker knew that the other party to the transaction had no separate legal representation and had no or no adequate opportunity to satisfy himself as to his client’s right to convey the feudal title or the effectiveness of the conveyance. </div> <bR> <div> He knew and did not take any adequate steps to correct the misrepresentation and that he failed to advise purchasers to instruct their own solicitors. </div> <bR> <div> The circumstances were such that he should have suspected and questioned what was going on including that the transactions were not effective to convey the feudal titles. </div> <div> Mr. Pitts-Tucker probably did not know or observe the signs of fraud at first, but should have declined to act for Mr. Boada his client after the autumn of 2002. </div> <bR> <div> Mr. Pitts-Tucker witnessed legal documents for his client without that client being present. </div> <div> The ultimate conclusion is that Mr. Pitts-Tucker had been dishonest. However, it was accepted that the facts in this case were not likely to recur. The general principle or guideline, where the bulk of the allegations were found to have been proved, is that the prosecutor, the Solicitors Regulation Authority, would be entitled to its costs, which were about £300,000. </div> <bR> <div> However, mitigating circumstances were considered and Mr. Pitts-Tucker was given a fine of £80,000 and given a six month suspension for his dishonesty. This judgment, however, in no way has satisfied the demands of justice, fairness or equity for Mr. Pitts-Tucker, because through his willful negligence, he damaged the lives of a large number of people. The wrongs have not been righted and Mr. Pitts-Tucker is not inclined to do anything to help the victims of his misconduct. </div> <bR> <div> In addition, the allegation of fraud needs to be fully investigated as “<B>dubious</B>” conveyances would mean that they were unsettled, uncertain, suspect and questionable. In other words, they are of doubtful legitimacy. The Tribunal were not asked to rule on the accusation of fraud, but their findings strongly suggest that fraud exists, that is, the signs or warning signals of serious crime were obvious and powerful enough to convict Mr. Pitts-Tucker of grave misconduct. (Ibid.)</div> <bR> <div> <B>Appeal & Invitation</B></div> <bR> <div> September 10, 2009</div> <bR> <div> Dear Mr. Pitts-Tucker,</div> <bR> <div> I hear you are appealing the findings of the November 2008 Tribunal. Remember, appeals are a “<B>two-edged sword.</B>” This may backfire on you. You are taking a great risk. If you do not have something solid, like verifiable proof that the Imperial family were actually a party to the conveyance of the title of Halberstadt, then you waste money and make yourself look even worse. </div> <bR> <div> I thought you might have an ace in the deck, like the proof your firm binding promised in the “<B>undertaking,</B>” but obviously you can't play this card, if you don't have it. And it doesn't look very good to have an outstanding “<B>undertaking</B>” --- a most basic and willful violation of professional conduct glaring in the face of all those who must judge you. </div> <bR> <div> It looks to me that you are digging yourself in deeper and deeper. The more you show to judges and others that fraud was probably involved, the more you show “<B>probably cause</B>” to proceed with a full investigation of your involvement as an accomplice or accessory as you “<B>should or ought to have known</B>” what was going on right under your nose and with your stamp of approval and encouragement.</div> <bR> <div> I invite you to fulfill your professional duty, and observe and perform the obligations of the “<B>undertaking.</B>” It would certainly be in your best interests. Or, do you feel you are above the rules that everyone else must respect? Have you ever heard of the concepts of justice, fairness and equity? Or are these meaningless to you? What kind of solicitor are you? Your behavior suggests you are unworthy. </div> <bR> <div> Unless, you comply with your obligated duty, I must assume you were involved in the heinous crime of fraud. Therefore, you may prove “<B>probable cause</B>” if you fail.</div> <bR> <div> The point is, sooner or later every foundation is exposed for what it really is. You will demonstrate that you are honorable or a disgrace and an embarrassment or even a liability to the profession. </div> <bR> <div> So far, I'd give you an “<B>F</B>” in the moral and ethical standards --- you lie, your dishonest, you won't fess up, an “<B>A</B>” in using lame excuses that have no substance or even relevance, an “<B>F</B>” in common courtesy --- not responding to me for years, an “<B>F</B>” in professional conduct as demonstrated in the findings of the Tribunal and in being in breach of your “<B>undertaking</B>” to me, and an “<B>F</B>” in common decency --- you have never tried to right any of your wrongs --- how you have hurt many people. You are totally and completely unworthy to be a solicitor of country-regionEngland and placecountry-regionWales or any other country unless you change dramatically.</div> <bR> <div> A sure fire way of knowing that you intend to be honorable is if you honor your firm's “<B>undertaking</B>” and perform your obligation in full accord with the standards of your profession. If you do not, then it is obvious that you will continue to be corrupt, unprincipled and shady in your dealings. It will mean that being upright, faithful and true to what is right has no meaning to you. You will show your true colors --- who you really are. </div> <bR> <div> It is my hope that you care enough about what is right to do what is right --- actualize your promise, and then I will know there is some decency in you.</div> <bR> <div> Sincerely yours,  </div> <bR> <div> <B>Only if everyone makes complaints will something happen. It’s like the saying, “United we stand divided we fall.” Only when the authorities see that hundreds have been robbed and cheated, will they put a priority on this case. Go to “</B><A HREF="id58.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Answer"><U><B>The Answer</B></U></A><B>” for more information.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>Please read the "</B><FONT SIZE="4" COLOR="#BF0000" FACE="Benguiat Bk BT" ><A HREF="id33.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Disclaimer"><U><B>Disclaimer.</B></U></A></FONT><B>"</B></div> <bR> <div> <A HREF="id83.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 3"><U><B>Previous Page</B></U></A><A HREF="id82.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 2"><U><B> </B></U></A><B>/ </B><A HREF="id86.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 4"><U><B>Next Page</B></U></A>   </div> <div>  </div> </td> </tr></table></body>