Crooked Solicitor18

<body topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 marginheight=0 marginwidth=0> <table cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0 border=0><tr> <td valign="top" colspan=2 height=90 BGCOLOR="#006699" TEXT="#080000" background="1d0fd5a3.jpg"> <div> <FONT SIZE="5" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" ><B>Phoney Titles of Nobility: British Feudal Investments, Ltd. Exposed</B></FONT><B>    </B><B> |     </B><A HREF="index.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Phoney Titles of Nobility: British Feuda"><U><B>home</B></U></A></div> <bR> <div> </div> </td> </tr><tr> <td valign="top" width=210 BGCOLOR="#FFCC66" TEXT="#080000" background="1d1d2b03.jpg"> <div> <IMG SRC="157ae6c0.jpg" border=0 width="174" height="108" ALIGN="BOTTOM" HSPACE="0" VSPACE="0"></div> <div> <B>Justice is one of the greatest and most beautiful things next to life itself and the glorious principle of freedom.</B></div> <div> <B>This website is dedicated to bring some very despicable men to justice.</B></div> </td> <td valign="top" height=390 BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" TEXT="#080000"> <div> <I>Crooked Solicitor18</I></div> <div> <A HREF="index.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Phoney Titles of Nobility: British Feuda"><U>Home</U></A>  <FONT SIZE="4" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" >I </FONT><A HREF="id48.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="News"><U>News</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id47.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Summary of Theft"><U>Summary of Theft</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id54.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Boadas Foul and Deceitful Claim"><U>Boada's Foul and Deceitful Claim</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id55.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Core Issue"><U>Core Issue</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id58.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Answer"><U>The Answer</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id19.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Website1"><U>Website1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id20.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Website2"><U>Website2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id21.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Revealing Article"><U>Revealing Article</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Deceptions1"><U>Deceptions1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id25.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Deceptions2"><U>Deceptions2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id40.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Deceptions3"><U>Deceptions3</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada1a.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams1"><U>Scams1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id27.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams2"><U>Scams2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id29.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams3"><U>Scams3</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada___roger_pitts_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Proof of Fraud"><U>Proof of Fraud</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id34.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Accomplice1"><U>Accomplice1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id50.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Accomplice2"><U>Accomplice2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada26.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Fake Titles"><U>Fake Titles</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id45.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="New Discoveries1"><U>New Discoveries1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id51.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="New Discoveries2"><U>New Discoveries2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="roger_anthony_pitt_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor1"><U>Crooked Solicitor1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id46.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor2"><U>Crooked Solicitor2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id62.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor3"><U>Crooked Solicitor3</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id63.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor4"><U>Crooked Solicitor4</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id64.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor5"><U>Crooked Solicitor5</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id65.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor6"><U>Crooked Solicitor6</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id67.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor7"><U>Crooked Solicitor7</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id66.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor8"><U>Crooked Solicitor8</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id68.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor9"><U>Crooked Solicitor9</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id69.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor10"><U>Crooked Solicitor10</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id70.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor11"><U>Crooked Solicitor11</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id71.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor12"><U>Crooked Solicitor12</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id72.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor13"><U>Crooked Solicitor13</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id73.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor14"><U>Crooked Solicitor14</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id74.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor15"><U>Crooked Solicitor15</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id75.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor16"><U>Crooked Solicitor16</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id76.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor 17"><U>Crooked Solicitor 17</U></A>   |   <B>Crooked Solicitor18</B>   |   <A HREF="id78.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor19"><U>Crooked Solicitor19</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id79.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor 20"><U>Crooked Solicitor 20</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id80.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor 21"><U>Crooked Solicitor 21</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id81.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 1"><U>Open Defiance of Undertaking 1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id82.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 2"><U>Open Defiance of Undertaking 2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id83.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 3"><U>Open Defiance of Undertaking 3</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id85.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Findings and Appeal"><U>Findings and Appeal</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id86.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 4"><U>Open Defiance of Undertaking 4</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id87.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Open Defiance of Undertaking 5"><U>Open Defiance of Undertaking 5</U></A>   |   <A HREF="irish_and_english_baronies.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Selling the Forbidden"><U>Selling the Forbidden</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada___roger_pitts_tucker24.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Challenge"><U>The Challenge</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id60.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Declaration of Ownership"><U>Declaration of Ownership</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id57.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Diversion Tactics"><U>Diversion Tactics</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id42.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Reactions"><U>Reactions</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id33.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Disclaimer"><U>Disclaimer</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id23.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Contact "><U>Contact </U></A>   |   <A HREF="id44.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Index"><U>Index</U></A></div> <bR> <div> <B>If you have been victimize by any of these despicable men, Antonio A. Boada, Mark T. Williams or Roger Pitts-Tucker, go to "</B><A HREF="id58.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Answer"><U><B>The Answer</B></U></A><B>" and learn how you can join in a class action suit against them.</B></div> <div> <B> </B></div> <div> <B>*************************************</B></div> <div> <B>Just tell the truth</B></div> <bR> <div> October 15, 2008</div> <bR> <div> Dear Mr. Pitts-Tucker,</div> <bR> <div> I suppose you are refining and finalizing your defense strategy at this time. The following are some really bad defense tactics you might want to avoid as the judges would have to have very low IQ's to fall for them. In other words, I wouldn't suggest that you insult them with any of the following:<FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#444444" FACE="Arial" > </FONT></div> <bR> <div> (1)<FONT SIZE="1" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" >  </FONT>Playing the <B>blame game</B> and not taking any responsibility for your actions. As a kind of humorous example, it has been said that this games comes all the way down through the corridors of history from Adam, who upon being confronted by God about the fruit, said, “<B>The woman thou gavest me. . . .</B>” and Eve said also passed the buck and said, “<B>The serpent. . . .</B>” The blame game is an especially common practice among children. To use this tactic would be to lower your self or stoop to a childish practice. It's not manly or honorable. It is self-denigrating and would only make you look even worse in the eyes of everyone who knew about it.</div> <div> (2)<FONT SIZE="1" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" >  </FONT><B>Vilify </B>Mr. Boada or myself: This is a close cousin to the <B>blame game.</B> It is just a <B>distraction strategy</B> that is easy to spot. It is an <B>avoidance ploy</B> used to <B>divert attention from the</B> <B>critical issue</B>, which is the required proof you are obligated to show that the heirs to the Imperial family (the owners) actually sold all the rights they had to the feudal property of Halberstadt to me through Mr. Boada, the con artist, back in the year 2000.</div> <div> (3)<FONT SIZE="1" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" >  </FONT><B>Complicate</B> the picture with irrelevant facts to confuse and derail everyone's attention from the fact that you are required to prove <B>good title</B>. You owe this duty because you were the advertised <B>conveyancing solicitor </B>for years on the internet. And from the “<B>undertaking</B>” or binding promise your firm made for and in behalf of Mr. Boada and British Feudal Investments, Ltd., you are obligated to share the verifiable and confirmable “<B>documents</B>” that prove the conveyance was legit, that is, that the owners actually sold the property to me. </div> <div> (4)<FONT SIZE="1" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" >  </FONT>“<B>Beat around the bush</B>”---not a good idea. You are going to be pushed into a corner. It will stick out like a sore thumb and only make it ever more obvious that you have no substance, that is, that your arguments are weak and cannot hold any water. Your duty is clear, prove <B>good title</B>.</div> <div> (5)<FONT SIZE="1" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" >  </FONT>Use <B>rhetoric or sophistry</B>: Again, your opponents, the prosecution side, will show that your defense team, articulate or not, has no real evidence, backing or substantial evidence, only lame excuses to offer for all the great wrongs that took place.</div> <div> (6)<FONT SIZE="1" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" >  </FONT><B>Make things up, lie or forge papers</B>: this would be extremely dangerous or foolhardy under the circumstances. New charges may be preferred and you'd go from the frying pan right into the fire only to be burned up and destroyed.</div> <div> (7)<FONT SIZE="1" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" >  </FONT><B>Feign ignorance</B>: This is still an act of heavy and deplorable misconduct, because as a solicitor, as a professional in your field, you legally “<B>knew or ought to have known</B>” better. And frankly, you did know better, hence the foolishness of this kind of rationale.</div> <bR> <div> The point is, do not attempt to cloud the issues and try to run away from your responsibilities. It will only hurt you in the long-run. You must fulfill your solemn duty to me to provide the evidence that the conveyance was legit and from the people it was supposed to be from---the true owners of the principality---the Prinz von Preussen's---the heirs to Imperial German House of Hohenzollern. </div> <bR> <div> I wrote to the Law Society and to you that you would do anything, lie, cheat and steal, play games, use tricks, divert, distract, vilify, beat around the bush, anything, but show that a real conveyance took place instead of a fraud. I was right, so far. </div> <bR> <div> Of course, the ideal defense strategy would be to prove that this conveyance actually took place and was an authentic transfer of property from the true owners to the buyer, then the accusation and fact that I sent you compelling evidence of fraud and you turned a deaf ear to it, failed to check it out and continued to promote, encourage and defend a con artist would go totally flat. </div> <bR> <div> But since you cannot do this, Well then, what should you do? </div> <bR> <div> Note the legal tests, I've shared with you before, given by the Law Society on being guilty of being as an accomplice or accessory to a crime. You qualify under each and every item mentioned <B>5.14</B> for a start in the Guidelines of your profession states:</div> <bR> <div> <B>It is now clear that the accessory must have acted dishonestly in the sense that his conduct falls below what is required of an honest solicitor in the circumstances. Honesty is judged objectively and inferences can be drawn where, for example, someone deliberately closes his eyes or ears, or deliberately fails to ask questions in case he learns something he would rather not know. </B>(Royal Brunei Airlines v Tan [1995] 2 AC 378 and Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley [2002] 2 AC 164) (<FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><B><U>www.lawsociety.org.uk/professional/conduct/guideonline/view=page.law?POLICYID=225074</U></B></FONT>)</div> <bR> <div> In <B>5.9</B> of the same chapter, it discusses what case law suggests about the level of knowledge needed to make one culpable and guilty of such a felony crime. In every test suggested, you come out smelling like a shyster-a heartlessly guilty man who cares little about the law or the people who were victimized and ruined in some cases by the scam he supported and upheld as squeaky clean:</div> <bR> <div> <B>(a) actual knowledge; </B>(you knew what was going on or you would have found a way to prove the title was good long before things got so bad that everything in your life that you value is being threatened. No thinking person would throw away everything he cares about if he could remedy the situation)</div> <div> <B>(b) willfully shutting one's eyes to the obvious; </B>(you turned a deaf ear to the clear and convincing evidence I sent and never checked any of it out, or you would have been alarmed and immediately acted on it-at least a "<B>responsible, honest and prudent</B>" man would have done so)</div> <div> <B>(c) willfully and recklessly failing to make such inquiries as an honest and reasonable man would have made; </B>(I sent you allegations of the most serious kind, but even though the crime of fraud reared its ugly head and was brought to your attention, you failed to use the contact information I sent to discover for yourself that it was true. I practically begged you to listen and open you eyes to see that I was being cheated and so were many others, but you "<B>willfully and recklessly fail[ed] to make such inquires</B>")</div> <div> <B>(d) knowledge of circumstances which would indicate the facts to an honest and reasonable man; </B>(there were too many red flags, too many serious alerts and alarming warning signs, the allegations were so serious and grievous, an honest man, an honest and responsible solicitor would have been alarmed and checked them out and would have discovered that I told the truth. But not you, you cried "<B>caveat emptor</B>" and defended your client's right to rob and cheat people and give them nothing for their money, but the worthless papers, you provided. And why?-because the "<B>terms and conditions of sale,</B>" which you as a solicitor sworn to uphold the law defended-yet the so-called "<B>terms and conditions of sale</B>" made it so that your client could, you thought, and did commit the act of theft and would never be held accountable for it. What a great scheme you devised for theft to perpetuate itself over and over again) </div> <div> <B>(e) knowledge of circumstances which would put an honest and reasonable man on inquiry. </B>(you knew Mr. Boada was using an alias (<B>Cartaya</B>) on all the <B>Deeds of Transfer </B>and <B>Statutory Declarations</B>, yet you went along with it and aided and abetted his secrecy. Why?--when the guidelines specifically state that when an alias is being used, there is a probability of fraud especially when I sent you important evidence of such. I don't believe you could be so blind, unreasonable, reckless or unprofessional, I believe you knew what was going on. Your inadvertent confession makes it pretty obvious. It was <B>willful, </B>and legally you are responsible, because you "<B>knew or ought to have known</B>" better as a solicitor of England with over 30 years experience. It is shocking under the circumstances that when your client's honesty was questioned with compelling evidence, you did nothing, but intimidate and threatened those who questioned him. This is serious and weighty against you) (parenthesis added)</div> <bR> <div> Being practical is important here. Think about it logically. Since all your excuses are extremely weak and paper thin, and stick out like a sore thumb against you, you need to make a more sensible and intelligent move. Because, if your feeble alibi's are your best excuses, the best rationale you can come up with, then you are really in trouble and don't have much of a defense.</div> <bR> <div> It doesn't take a college professor to see through all your lame attempts to protect yourself. But the answer is so obvious and simple: "<B>Just tell the truth.</B>" And then do something extremely honorable, become a powerful, diligent and solid witness in the prosecution of Antonio A. Boada for fraud. You would be doing yourself a favor, gain respect by doing the only thing that is really noble and admirable as well as rational under the circumstances. And besides, you would be helping the whole country begin to rid itself of the many scams that abound in the British Isles over fake titles of nobility and phoney knighthoods. Then the whole nation as well as people all over the earth would be better off because of your decision to be honest and truthful. </div> <bR> <div> Remember, this is no small thing. People are being robbed of many thousands of dollars every year from at least 50 title of nobility or phoney knighthood cons that are headquartered in the British Isles. </div> <bR> <div> I expect you to do what is honorable and thus mitigate the heavy weight that would otherwise accompany your sentence. This is the only thing that makes real sense. It is my hope that you will come through this whole rotten mess smelling like a rose---a hero rather than a scoundrel who attempted to hide his infamy in dark, lawyer tricks or maneuverings only to be caught and exposed as corrupt, guilty and despicable in the end. That is, show that you have what it takes to be worthy of honor and be a contributor to society, your nation and the whole world. </div> <bR> <div> In <B>Bolton -v- The Law Society 1 W.L.R. 512; [1994] 2 All E.R. 486</B>, it stated that a solicitor must be a person of probity, integrity and trustworthiness and must not fall below those high standards. </div> <div> Just tell the truth about what really happened and commit yourself to bringing Mr. Boada to justice.</div> <bR> <div> Sincerely yours, (name redacted)---your victim who wishes you well.</div> <bR> <div> <B>If you have been victimized by Mr. Boada, Mr. Williams or Mr. Pitts-Tucker, it’s time to make criminal complaints and sue them for the detestable things they have done to you and many others. It’s like the saying, “United we stand divided we fall.” Only when the authorities see that hundreds have actually been robbed and cheated, will they put a priority on this serious case. Go to “</B><A HREF="id58.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Answer"><U><B>The Answer</B></U></A><B>” for more information.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>Please read the "</B><FONT SIZE="4" COLOR="#BF0000" FACE="Benguiat Bk BT" ><A HREF="id33.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Disclaimer"><U><B>Disclaimer.</B></U></A></FONT><B>"</B></div> <bR> <div> <A HREF="id76.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor 17"><U><B>Previous Page</B></U></A><B> /</B><A HREF="irish_and_english_baronies.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Selling the Forbidden"><U><B> </B></U></A><A HREF="id78.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor19"><U><B>Next Page</B></U></A><FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Times New Roman" ><A HREF="id78.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor19"><U> </U></A></FONT></div> <bR> <bR> <bR> </td> </tr></table></body>