|
Justice is one of the greatest and most beautiful things next to life itself and the glorious principle of freedom.
This website is dedicated to bring some very despicable men to justice.
|
Crooked Solicitor12
If you have been victimize by any of these despicable men, Antonio A. Boada, Mark T. Williams or Roger Pitts-Tucker, go to "The Answer" and learn how you can join in a class action suit against them.
*************************************
Last Appeal Before the Tribunal
Dear Mr. Pitts-Tucker,
Now that the Tribunal is really close, I'd like to express the following. This is probably my last chance. What will actually happen in the Tribunal is unknown to me. I don't even know what you have been charged with, but I hope it has a good ending, which will be obvious only after you finish the whole letter.
It really doesn't bother me terribly that you are guilty of misconduct, malpractice, negligence, deceitfulness, lack of due diligence, flagrant disregard of conveyancing laws and regulations that protect consumers, serious violations of "Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999" and "Consumer Transactions (Restrictions on Statements) Order 1976" with Mr. Boada's illegal, unfair, imbalance "conditions of sale," derelict in fulfilling your firm's "undertaking" to me, which you still owe me, operating well below the standards of your profession, false advertizing stating that you operate with the highest standard of integrity and excellence when, in fact, the very opposite took place, total disregard of a legal duty of care to third party obligations, especially myself, giving lame excuses and justifications for your neglect of duty, etc., etc. This doesn't concern me terribly, but you should be struck off the list of practicing solicitors for such gross wrong doing. You are a loose cannon who has hurt a lot of people. You obviously lacked what it takes to be true and honorable. I doubt you would ever try to right your wrongs if not pressured to do so. You seem to have no conscience. Obviously, such a person is not fit to be a solicitor as such a one cannot be depended on to operate with integrity and good faith.
But the worst thing of this whole damn affair is the result or outcome of your willful neglect. Neither I, nor anyone else, as far as I know, obtained a "good and marketable" title for the feudal property (the incorporeal hereditaments) we purchased. This is the ugly truth for which you are directly responsible. If you had done your duty, hardly anyone would have been taken in by the scam your client was running.
Then of all things, you admitted in your March 14, 2003 and September 29, 2003 letters to the Law Society that you knew all the time, from the onset, that the title I was sold was "purely honorific," not really a "feudal title," or an "incorporeal hereditament" that should be sold under the law of real property. Hence, you portrayed it, not to be authentic or genuine, but merely a "name" or "vanity" or not the real McCoy. That it was just "personal or moveable property like a "copyright," or merely "intangible property" like an invention, and therefore, there was no requirement to sell it under the law of real property. You went so far as to write, "This has been their [British Feudal Investments, Ltd.'s] course of business, not only through my firm but also through their previous firm of solicitors." Note your admittance that my title was sold this way "through [your] firm." This makes you responsible and accountable for the legal wrongs associated with it.
Even though you knew that the titles were really nothing, yet you had no concern, no qualm about the fact that your client was selling them as if they were real. This means you knowingly and willfully permitted and encouraged a malicious misrepresentation of the facts to go on right under your very nose. This makes you an accomplice and/or accessory to the crime, because you knew all about it from your description of your practice and did nothing to stop it. Rather you defended your client and declared that he did no wrong.
Yet the very documents, i.e., "Deed of Transfer" and the "June and November 2000 Statutory Declarations" you signed declared ten times that a "feudal Principality" was being sold, not just a name. These documents stated "said fief" once, "Feudal Title" three times, "feudal manorial titles" once, "feudal property" once and that the principality was part of the "Incorporeal Hereditaments" of the "Imperial and Royal House of Hohenzollern" or the "Imperial German House of Hohenzollern" and that the property was an "Incorporeal Hereditament" once and that I was the "Feudal Prince of Halberstadt" twice. You also could not help but notice that one of the documents was a "Deed of Transfer," which was called a "Deed of Conveyance" in the June 2008 Statutory Declaration. All of this makes it clear that a genuine incorporeal hereditament was purported to be sold via the law of real property contrary to your confession that you knew the title was merely a "name." or in other words, a sham-a fraudulent misrepresentation.
Any reasonably intelligent human being would take note of the protruding contradiction here and be alarmed at the idea that his client was declaring that a whole authentic "feudal principality" was being sold via the law of real property as an incorporeal hereditament, while you declared it was nothing of the sort---it was merely a "name" and nothing more, because "German titles have been abolished in all but name. . . . Therefore, you knew about the scam and played along with it as you stated that this was the course of business your client did through [your] firm.
No reasonable, honest man would do this. No reasonable solicitor would be so irresponsible and negligent especially in light of the fact that I sent you "clear and convincing" evidence of fraud along with the contact information so you could check it out or verify that I had given you top notch evidence (incriminating proof) that a serious crime had been committed against me, but you irresponsibly and thoughtlessly disregarded it, or took no thought to find out if it was true or not. Your response to me was to say "caveat emptor," I'll sue you and we have done everything legally we were supposed to do, which was another damn lie, because:
(1) you owed me, and still owe, me the fulfillment of an "undertaking" proving the Imperial family of German actually conveyed the property as claimed,
(2) you were supposed to provide an "abstract of title" or "root of title," but didn't, and
(3) you were obligated by law to disclose latent (fatal) defects of title before any deal was completed. That defect was unveiled in the November 2000 Statutory Declaration that supposedly the Imperial family members would not disclose their identity making it impossible to prove anything was legit or valid or authentic. The consequence or result was I received a bad title, which, by legal definition, means a title . . . which conveys no property to a purchaser of an estate. ( www.lectlaw.com/def2/t030.htm) In other words, I was robbed and cheated. I received nothing for the money I paid out. It was a scam and according to the November 2000 Statutory Declaration, this fact was well known at the time of my purchase.
Remember, The basic legal work necessary to transfer the ownership of land and property requires UK conveyancing solicitors [you--- Mr. Pitts-Tucker] to ensure that the person selling the property actually owns that which is being sold and has the right to do so. ( www.itplusweb.com) This you miserably failed to do which caused so much damage to me personally---a bankruptcy that still haunts me.
But the most revealing of all evidence is that the lawful heirs to the Imperial family patrimony (including the Principality of Halberstadt, which was one of their possessions) deny ever selling a principality to anyone or having any dealings with your client in any capacity, or any involvement with one of Mr. Boada's fabricated or bogus organizations. In other words, your client as I sent proof to you in early 2001 was involved in a scheme to sell things he did not own or had any lawful right to sell. You could have prevented this merely by doing your duty.
You were the only solicitor involved with BFI, Ltd. You declared that they operated their business through [your] firm making you bear a huge amount of the responsible for his criminal act of bilking innocent, unsuspecting people, who trusted that with your involvement, the company was legit and what was being sold was authentic. You were the only one advertized by your client as being the sole conveyancer of all titles as their only solicitor. No one else in the company was licensed to do conveyancing commercially. You were the only one involved who had legal authority to do so. Unless you were mentally defective, you also knew that Mr. Boada was supposed to be conveying feudal titles under the law of real property. You admitted all of this in your firm's letter to Dr. (name redacted) on December 11. 2000 (The Law Society has a copy of this letter) Yet you denied that the property was anything more than a "name," not an actual feudal principality or incorporeal hereditament, so you knew about the deception that was going on. This means you willingly and knowingly participated in a scheme to defraud. In fact, your firm's letter to Dr. (name redacted) states that the properties conveyed were not just a name[s], trademark[s] or copyright[s] not just once, but twice was this point made. So you have been caught in guile. And it was stated in this letter that the property was a feudal title or incorporeal hereditament and I quote from your firm: The law of real property applies to incorporeal hereditaments in that they can only be conveyed by deed, which is the way they were conveyed.
(By the way, Dr. (name redacted) was inquiring about and eventually purchased a German feudal principality---the principality of Mergentheim)
All of this is in distinct contradiction to your confession to the Law Society that the title is nothing more than a name. I have sent them other examples of how you have said one thing to one person and then contradicted yourself by saying the opposite to another, rather than be honest and act with the moral strength and integrity expected of a person holding the high status of respectability that a solicitor should.
May I remind you that you are professionally obligated or required by the Guidelines of your profession to fulfil your firm's "undertaking" to me and provide me with "good title." If you cannot, and you can't, then obviously there is more than enough "probable cause" to launch a full scale criminal investigation against you for your involvement in defrauding me and many others.
(The individual I have discussed this with at the Fraud Squad headquarters in the City of London told me that the first step is for the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal to make a determination, after this I am hoping for a criminal referral, because you cannot prove that the transaction was anything but a scam, and you knew from the onset that the so-called property was only a name. Then, it is hoped that a full scale investigation may commence. They also stated that there is no statute of limitations on this kind of crime.)
As I stated so long ago in my official complaint against you:
What would satisfy this particular grievance is if Roger Pitts-Tucker would provide irrefutable proof that could be verified and confirmed that the transfer of the title was actually/truly conveyed by senior members [the rightful heirs] of the Imperial and Royal House of Prussia through Antony Boada to me as claimed.
You cannot do this, you know that all too well, so the only alternative is that you participated in fraud as you inadvertently admitted. This, obviously, is far more troubling and damning than merely being convicted for misconduct and struck off of the list. You were obviously, willfully, involved in and supported a crime---something which you knew about by your confession. Hence, my efforts will be to promote your conviction for what you knowingly did against me and many others, who were also cheated by your failure to be law abiding and true to your trust. This is why I have contacted the Fraud Squad.
No honest, reasonable man would put his business, his life savings, his good name or his livelihood in grave jeopardy if he could prove good title and show that everything was above board. But you have avoided such like the plague. There is only one logical explanation. It was fraud and you know it. Therefore, you are doing your very best to hide, sneak, misapply legal procedures and weasel out of things.
My take is that you are probably ( I don't know this yet) a sociopath as you appear to have no conscience, care or concern about what you have done in the past, what you put other people through---your wrongs against society and your profession or the plight of your victims, which is a very sad state of affairs if true. But I know that you have never, not even once, offered to right your wrongs. Certainly not to me.
However, it is not too late for you to fess up and show honorable and honest traits and help bring to justice Mr. Boada. And fight the sale of falsehoods (counterfeit or fake titles of nobility) by using your expertise and financial resources against similar crimes as yours that seem to flourish so prevalently in England, instead of using your resources and wealth to offer up lame excuses to the Tribunal that nobody, no reasonable person, will believe anyway.
It appears from the past that you will you do anything, but prove that the transaction in my case was legitimately conveyed from the people the documents, you signed, claimed it to be from, that is, from the Imperial and Royal House of Hohenzollern. You have delayed things, stalled, used diversion tactics, blamed me, given lame and irrational excuses, threatened me, called me names, lied to me, neglected your duty---your firm's undertaking, refused to communicate or deal with me, and probably used various other lawyer's tricks, anything, but proved that the Imperial and Royal House of Hohenzollen (the prinz von Preussen's) actually/truly conveyed the title to me through your client.
It is not too late to make a turn around and help justice instead of be a part of the problem in society. Fiona Woolf, a former president of the Law Society said, The good name of solicitors is being jeopardised by a minority who betray the high principles of which our profession is proud. (http://lawsociety
.org.uk/documents/downloads/Profethics_SettingUp.pdf) You do not need to be a part of this group any longer.
Hence, I am inviting you---really the situation is inviting you to be the honorable man you should be. If there ever was a time to do so, now is the time to step forward and tell the truth, the whole truth, not hiding, fudging or distorting, but bring out everything as it really is, holding nothing back.
The results of such honorable behavior would doubtless help bring about justice against the con artist, Mr. Boada, and I believe it would powerfully mitigate your situation and greatly lessen the penalties you would suffer by a large margin or degree. I believe by doing this, you would have greater future possibilities open to you that otherwise would close up. I wish you well in this.
Sincerely yours,
If you have been victimized by Mr. Boada, Mr. Williams or Mr. Pitts-Tucker, its time to make criminal complaints and sue them for the detestable things they have done to you and many others. Its like the saying, United we stand divided we fall. Only when the authorities see that hundreds have actually been robbed and cheated, will they put a priority on this serious case. Go to The Answer for more information.
|