|
Justice is one of the greatest and most beautiful things next to life itself and the glorious principle of freedom.
This website is dedicated to bring some very despicable men to justice.
|
Crooked Solicitor11
If you have been victimize by any of these despicable men, Antonio A. Boada, Mark T. Williams or Roger Pitts-Tucker, go to "The Answer" and learn how you can join in a class action suit against them.
*************************************
The Undertaking of the Pitts-Tucker & Co.
March 12, 2008
Dear Mr. Pitts-Tucker,
I request that you respond to me. You don't have to, but I would like you to. By failing to answer me, you leave me in the dark. I don’t know if you are glad to have these thoughts, if they make you angry, or if you could care less one way or the other, or if you never bother to read them, or what. But it is not fair, respectful, decent or professional for you to ignore me as you have done for several years now. I have even asked you several times if you objected to anything on my website www.phoneynobletitles.com, but you totally disregarded this as well.
I am writing to you now, because I have an issue with you that has never been mentioned before—only alluded to, but should be mentioned before the hearing that is coming up in July 2008 where you may be struck off the list of practicing solicitors for numerous counts of professional misconduct, injuring countless people, and major ethical infractions. At least as far as I can gather, because I don’t get much feedback from anyone you or anyone else in this case. But the issue is:
You still have a binding obligation and duty to fulfill your firm’s "undertaking" to me:
(1) You failed to carry out the obvious and implied terms of the "undertaking," which I relied upon and warned you that I would be financially ruined if you did not prove or provide the "documents" that Mr. Boada actually had the authorization and authority to sell the principality of Halberstadt for and in behalf of the Imperial German House of Hohenzollern—the Royal House of Prussia as claimed. As a direct result of your failure to do your duty, I went bankrupt and am still suffering for it. This is a fact of history.
(2) Not only have you failed to do your duty as far as the "undertaking" goes. But you have continued to be derelict in this important binding promise. I still have not received the "documents" promised that would prove that a valid transaction took place instead of a scam. And I need the information you promised me, that the conveyance was authentic, to get out of the financial hole you put me in, because of the what appears to be the malicious and unacceptable nonperformance of your duty.
You were told several times that failure had heavy financial consequences for me in the past. Well, they still do. I could not and still cannot effectively start the business I wanted to and for which I am qualified, because of this failure on your part. I am relying on you to fulfill your trust, your word of honor, your promise---your undertaking. Keep in mind that according to the old Guidelines of the Law Society that impact on this major breach of trust, you have yet to fulfill this "undertaking." Section 18.02(3) states that:
The OSS expects solicitors to honour undertakings for so long as their names remain on the roll and regardless of whether or not they hold practising certificates. The Tribunal has power to consider allegations against a former solicitor relating to a time when he or she was a solicitor.
You need to understand that if I have to, I will make a formal complaint against you starting in 2008, and henceforth every year thereafter, if you do not fulfill your legal obligation to me. It is a matter of justice or what is fair that you should be fined every year you fail to do your duty.
I have lost perhaps hundred of thousands of dollars, for the employee recognition company I wanted to start, but could not in the highly competitive climate I live in, because I did not have what was promised me. That is, a "good and marketable title" to the principality of Halberstadt, which would have given me the edge needed. I became a certified professional consultant and finished up a degree I had started years ago in organizational behavior to do this, but you never came through, so I was left in the lurch and went bankrupt. I was a member of the National Association of Employee Recognitions and had plans to incorporate a business called "Honors and Recognitions." I went so far as to get a business license for this in Beaverton, Oregon, but never did any business as my tax records show, because I was blocked and curtailed by your failure to accomplish your charge to prove "good title" showing that the Imperial family really did convey said principality as declared in the your client’s Deed of Transfer and Statutory Declarations.
Not only did you own me a "duty of care," because of your "undertaking," but you still owe me this important legal obligation. The point here is, ". . . the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors will expect its [the undertaking’s] implementation as a matter of conduct." (Guidelines 18.02) If you want to be re-instated or clear your name, it would seem to be in your best interests to fulfill your word.
Any solicitor who is worth his salt—who is prudent and has integrity, honesty and probity, as required and expected in the teachings of the Law Society, would fulfill their word, and obey the law and prove themselves honorable. This is especially true when an undertaking is made.
It doesn’t take a genius to know that the best defense possible for you under the circumstances of an upcoming tribunal hearing would be to actually prove "good title." but no one can prove something false is true. At the very least, there is a 90% chance that the conveyance of the feudal principality was totally and completely an act of nothing less than fraud. But you must fulfill your promise, your "undertaking." So you will probably attempt to defend yourself with lawyer tricks, skirt issues, use questionable maneuvers, and give shaky excuses, blame others, complicate things, anything, but prove you were above board and true to your trust.
Yet all of this kind of behavior will only demonstrate to any honest, reasonable man that you are trying to get away with something reprehensible or some wrongdoing. There are far too many red flags and warning signs all over the place. They stick out all over the place. It isn't hidden. A reasonable person will see it. The judges of the SDT will see it very easily. You will be exposed. No one can change this, but you could fess up, take your lumps, make restitution and at least have some honor or potential for the future, if you decided to be straightforward and truthful. You could even become a witness against Antonio Boada for fraud. But otherwise, you will merely prove in a solid and sobering manner that you are a true reprobate, who will not change, or make amends, or do what is morally and ethically right. Therefore, you should not be considered worthy of the high regard and status of a solicitor, because you won't operate in full compliance to the standards of your profession.
I personally would be very glad if you proved yourself honorable and true, especially to a statement you had made on your former website, which was that you operated with "the highest standards of integrity and excellence." You did not do so for me, but perhaps you can change all that and yet be honorable, honest and forthcoming.
Now I offer this as food for thought and I would like to hear from you.
Sincerely yours
If you have been victimized by Mr. Boada, Mr. Williams or Mr. Pitts-Tucker, it’s time to make criminal complaints and sue them for the detestable things they have done to you and many others. It’s like the saying, “United we stand divided we fall.” Only when the authorities see that hundreds have actually been robbed and cheated, will they put a priority on this serious case. Go to “The Answer” for more information.
|