|
Justice is one of the greatest and most beautiful things next to life itself and the glorious principle of freedom.
This website is dedicated to bring some very despicable men to justice.
|
Crooked Solicitor8
If you have been victimize by any of these despicable men, Antonio A. Boada, Mark T. Williams or Roger Pitts-Tucker, go to "The Answer" and learn how you can join in a class action suit against them.
*************************************
CONTINUING EVIDENCE
January 9, 2008
Dear Mr. Pitts-Tucker,
I don’t know what the Law Society has charge you with. I can only tell you what I have found in terms of misconduct. The following are some more serious things you have done which have hurt and others a great deal.
In my last letter, I wrote about your hidden confession that fraud had occurred, that is, that a feudal title was essentially just a “name,” not a real or authentic title of nobility, but just a “name.” And that their conveyance via the Law of Property Act was inappropriate. The implications of this admission are profound. It means that you knowingly and willfully participated with your client in selling counterfeits or fakes, rather than what is genuine and true. In other words, you were part of the deception or fraud that was occurring and you knew all about it, because you stood by believing all the while that he was merely selling names while he represented them to be authentic. And you not only allowed him to scam others, but you defended your client and promoted his business.
An accessory is one who helps another commit a crime. An accomplice is more involve, he is a person who actively participates in the commission of a crime, even though they take no part in the actual criminal offence. It seems to me that you are one or the other.
To document that you were, in fact, aiding and abetting Mr. Boada, the con artist, I put your firm to the test in August of 2002. I used a guise, the alias of Christian Fletcher, to see if you or your company would be honest or not. Jane Orrell, Esq. of Pitts-Tucker & Co. responded and was asked if anyone had ever complained about BFI and its titles, and how such people were treated. But instead of answering Christina Fletcher honestly and ethically, Ms. Orrell sent Christina Fletcher a “Letter of Reference” that implied that everything was squeaky clean, good and right with Mr. Boada’s company. (The Law Society has a copy of this incriminating letter)
Remember 17.01.5 of The Guide to the Professional Conduct of Solicitors states, "A solicitor may be guilty of unbefitting conduct and may incur a liability where a false or misleading reference is given."
Your firm was way out of line to keep building up a company that operated a scam.
The fact is, people have complained and were treated very badly by both BFI and yourself. I was one of them and so was J. C. (name redacted)—another victim, who bought a fake title—an Irish Barony, which, of course, Mr. Boada claimed was authentic. But all Irish baronies were abolished by law in 1662 by the Irish Parliament and this law was signed by the King. In addition, the Assistant Chief Herald of Ireland declared that the particular barony that Mr. Boada sold him never existed in all the history of their land---so much for Mr. Boada’s honesty. The title was a total fabrication. If you had insisted that Mr. Boada provided “good title,” this would never have happened.
Now, as a second witness that you are guilty of aiding and abetting an ugly confidence game and that you knew full well what you were doing, you stated in your September 29, 2003 letter to the Law Society that “German titles have been abolished in all but name. . . .” (The Law Society has a copy of this letter) That is, you stated that the title of Halberstadt was a “purely honorific title,” again just a “name,” rather than a true and authentic feudal title of nobility. You also stated in the same paragraph that it was “personal or moveable property according to the laws of Germany,” which was a way of saying that it is not feudal property or an incorporeal hereditament, such that “the deed but not the transaction is therefore subject to English law.” Again, you claim the title is merely a “name” and the English Law of Property Act is not involved. And that “this has been their [BFI, Ltd.’s] course of business, not only through my firm but also through their previous firm of solicitors.”
Thank you for explaining that both you, and the former solicitors, knew that all German titles sold by Mr. Boada just “name[s],” were not feudal at all, and that the Law of Property Act was not involved. In other words, that when they declared that they were real titles, feudal and sold under the law of real property, it was a hoax. Thank you for letting us know that you knew they were involved in fraud---especially since this has been the way British Feudal Investments, Ltd. has always done things. It is gratifying that you attempted to come clean and admit it was fraud. But the problem now is that you willfully participated and supported it. This is why you can’t prove “good title” and have avoided all my requests to show that the Imperial and Royal House of Hohenzollern were involved and actually conveyed the principality. You knew the truth all along.
You, as the sole legal advisor to British Feudal Investments, Ltd. dishonestly allowed or supported your client Mr. Boada's right to lie in his official documents and website for in my letters I informed you that he declared his titles to be feudal and incorporeal hereditaments, etc. You even allowed your firm to lie and declared the opposite of what you know to be true. They declared that they “primarily check the drafting of the Deeds of Transfer,” so they knew that those deeds declared the titles to be feudal and to be transferred by the laws of England, etc. Note the following three examples:
(a) The Deed of Transfer and Statutory Declarations given to me clearly state the title was a “feudal title” and it was the “feudal principality” or “feudal property” that was sold to me “with all Rights, Privileges, Honours, and Emoluments (if any) appertaining thereto.” In addition in the June 2000 Statutory Declaration, it stated that it was “duly executed in accordance with the laws of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, Northern Ireland and Her Majesty’s Other Realms and Possession Beyond the Seas” not the laws of Germany. The November 2000 Statutory Declaration called these titles “Incorporeal Hereditaments” in one place and specifically, “. . . the feudal Incorporeal Hereditament of the Principality of Halberstadt . . .” in another. “Incorporeal hereditaments” are an English legal term for land rights and are sold via the English laws of real property.
(b) In your firm’s December 11, 2000 letter to Dr (name redacted) , who wanted to buy a German title (the Principality of Mergentheim) your firm stated that British Feudal Investments, Ltd. does not sell "a trademark or copyright," nor do they "try to pass of a name changed by Deed Poll as a title of nobility. These are not the practices of British Feudal Investments Limited." Rather:
. . . the company sells the actual title itself and the sale is made by way of a Deed of Transfer or Conveyance, which is the legal method of effecting such a sale. . . . Since the property owned is a mere right, not a physical object, it is called incorporeal. The law of real property applies to incorporeal hereditaments in that they can only be conveyed by deed. . . . A feudal title may have very real and valuable appurtenant rights, such as mineral rights, or the right to levy a charge for access to common land, or rights of franchise to hold a market or fair, or very rarely, a right displacing a Crown prerogative right to wreck. None of these rights of course apply when buying merely a 'name', copyright or trademark. Reference may be made to the Law of Property Acts 1922 - 1925. (The Law Society has a copy of this letter)
Note that your firm states that feudal titles, and in this case it was a German feudal title, that he would not be "buying merely a ‘name,’" but "the actual title itself," and since they are land rights or "incorporeal hereditaments," "the law of real property applies." Note that reference for all these remarks is "made to Law of Property Acts 1922-1925."
(c) As quoted in my last letter, Mr. Boada posted on his website under the subtitle "Frequently Asked Questions," the following:
"Are these titles genuine? Yes, feudal titles are considered ‘incorporeal hereditaments’ or intangible property under the Law of Property Act 1922-1925 of the United Kingdom. They are titles that once went with tenure or ownership of land in medieval times. We do not sell disguised legal name changes, nor a square foot of land in the form of a ‘souvenir plot’ in order to put your name on a deed with a title included in it nor do we sell copyrights, patents, trademarks, etc. We sell the actual property required by the law to grant the rank and legal status of nobility." (The Law Society has a copy of Mr. Boada’s old website)
How do you reconcile this? You knew better, but you didn’t care that your client was committing acts of deception and lying to everyone? What kind of solicitor would do this? You even allowed your firm to support and affirm that the titles were not just "name[s]," but real titles of nobility, that they were feudal and "incorporeal hereditaments" conveyed under the Law of Property Acts in England.
All of this was extremely irresponsible making you guilty of supporting fraud. Section 17.01 Fairness states, "Solicitors must not act, whether in their professional capacity or otherwise, towards anyone in a way which is fraudulent, deceitful or otherwise contrary to their position as solicitors." In addition, Section 17.01.1 states, "A solicitor must not deceive anyone. . . ." (www.guide-on-line.lawsociety.org.uk) What you have done is in direct violation of these mandates.
What happened to your self-professed aim "to follow the highest standard of excellence and integrity" and your self-proclaimed values of "integrity and openness in everything we do," your "commitment to quality," and such self-declared ideals as "professionalism," "dedication," and "integrity." All of these words and phrases were on your old website for years.
But at least I recognize and honor the fact that you started telling the truth in your letters to the Law Society even if it shows that you actually knew that fraud was taking place.
My recommendation is that you make a full confession and take full responsibility by starting to write your wrongs. I realize you cannot prove "good title," but until you fess up, I will hold you to it. At this point, I don’t care if you ever give me a dime, but please start making up your wrongs to others. There were a lot of victims.
Sincerely yours,
P.S. There are more incriminating evidence I will sent you.
If you have been victimized by Mr. Boada, Mr. Williams or Mr. Pitts-Tucker, it’s time to make criminal complaints and sue them for the detestable things they have done to you and many others. It’s like the saying, “United we stand divided we fall.” Only when the authorities see that hundreds have actually been robbed and cheated, will they put a priority on this serious case. Go to “The Answer” for more information.
|