Crooked Solicitor4

<body topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 marginheight=0 marginwidth=0> <table cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0 border=0><tr> <td valign="top" colspan=2 height=90 BGCOLOR="#006699" TEXT="#080000" background="154fd5a3.jpg"> <div> <FONT SIZE="6" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" ><B>Phoney Titles of Nobility: British Feudal Investments, Ltd. Exposed</B></FONT><B> </B><B> </B></div> </td> </tr><tr> <td valign="top" width=210 BGCOLOR="#FFCC66" TEXT="#080000" background="155d2b03.jpg"> <div> <IMG SRC="157ae6c0.jpg" border=0 width="174" height="108" ALIGN="BOTTOM" HSPACE="0" VSPACE="0"></div> <div> <B>Justice is one of the greatest and most beautiful things next to life itself and the glorious principle of freedom.</B></div> <div> <B>This website is dedicated to bring some very despicable men to justice.</B></div> </td> <td valign="top" height=390 BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" TEXT="#080000"> <div> Crooked Solicitor4</div> <div> <A HREF="index.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Phoney Titles of Nobility: British Feuda"><U>Home</U></A>  <FONT SIZE="4" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" >I </FONT><A HREF="id48.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="News"><U>News</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id47.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Summary of Theft"><U>Summary of Theft</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id54.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Boadas Foul and Deceitful Claim"><U>Boada's Foul and Deceitful Claim</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id55.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Core Issue"><U>Core Issue</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id58.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Answer"><U>The Answer</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id19.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Website1"><U>Website1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id20.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Website2"><U>Website2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id21.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Revealing Article"><U>Revealing Article</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Deceptions1"><U>Deceptions1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id25.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Deceptions2"><U>Deceptions2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id40.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Deceptions3"><U>Deceptions3</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada1a.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams1"><U>Scams1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id27.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams2"><U>Scams2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id29.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams3"><U>Scams3</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada___roger_pitts_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Proof of Fraud"><U>Proof of Fraud</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id34.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Accomplice1"><U>Accomplice1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id50.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Accomplice2"><U>Accomplice2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada26.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Fake Titles"><U>Fake Titles</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id45.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="New Discoveries1"><U>New Discoveries1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id51.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="New Discoveries2"><U>New Discoveries2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="roger_anthony_pitt_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor1"><U>Crooked Solicitor1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id46.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor2"><U>Crooked Solicitor2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id62.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor3"><U>Crooked Solicitor3</U></A>   |   <B>Crooked Solicitor4</B>   |   <A HREF="id64.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor5"><U>Crooked Solicitor5</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id65.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor6"><U>Crooked Solicitor6</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id67.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor7"><U>Crooked Solicitor7</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id66.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor8"><U>Crooked Solicitor8</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id68.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor9"><U>Crooked Solicitor9</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id69.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor10"><U>Crooked Solicitor10</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id70.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor11"><U>Crooked Solicitor11</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id71.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor12"><U>Crooked Solicitor12</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id72.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor13"><U>Crooked Solicitor13</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id73.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor14"><U>Crooked Solicitor14</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id74.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor15"><U>Crooked Solicitor15</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id75.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor16"><U>Crooked Solicitor16</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id76.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor 17"><U>Crooked Solicitor 17</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id77.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor18"><U>Crooked Solicitor18</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id78.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor19"><U>Crooked Solicitor19</U></A>   |   <A HREF="irish_and_english_baronies.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Selling the Forbidden"><U>Selling the Forbidden</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada___roger_pitts_tucker24.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Challenge"><U>The Challenge</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id60.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Declaration of Ownership"><U>Declaration of Ownership</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id57.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Diversion Tactics"><U>Diversion Tactics</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id42.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Reactions"><U>Reactions</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id33.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Disclaimer"><U>Disclaimer</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id23.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Contact "><U>Contact </U></A>   |   <A HREF="id44.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Index"><U>Index</U></A></div> <bR> <div> <B>If you have been victimize by any of these despicable men, Antonio A. Boada, Mark T. Williams or Roger Pitts-Tucker, go to "</B><A HREF="id58.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Answer"><U><B>The Answer</B></U></A><B>" and learn how you can join in a class action suit against them. </B></div> <DIV ALIGN="LEFT"></DIV> <div> <B>*************************************</B></div> <div> <B>Three more recent invitation letters, which Mr. Pitts-Tucker has failed to answer are posted here for all to see. They provide more powerful and weighty evidence of gross neglect and misconduct on the part of Mr. Roger Pitts-Tucker.  The April 1, 2006 letter is a conclusion letter showing the obvious implications of his total lack of response. </B></div> <bR> <div> <B>April 1, 2006</B></div> <bR> <div> Dear Mr. Pitts-Tucker,</div> <bR> <div> This is the logical conclusion to my four letters to you which started on <B>March 2, 2006. </B></div> <bR> <div> You did not responded, as invited, to do so by the <B>March 31, 2006 </B>deadline. Let it, therefore, be duly noted that you disregarded my request and invitation that you fulfil your lawful duties and obligations.</div> <bR> <div> This was a test of your “<B>integrity.</B>” A test to see, if invited, what you would do. Would your fulfil your “<B>undertaking,</B>” your “<B>duty of care,</B>” your obligation to the law and your profession? Well, you didn’t. You flunked the test and got an “<B>F.</B>”  </div> <bR> <div> What happened to your self-professed aim “<B>to follow the highest standard of excellence and integrity</B>” and your self-proclaimed values of  “<B>integrity and openness in everything we do</B>,” your “<B>commitment to quality,</B>” and such self-declared ideals as “<B>professionalism,</B>” “<B>dedication,</B>” “<B>integrity</B>” and a “<B>willingness to work hard.</B>” Were these only for people you liked? Do you discriminate and choose who you will be fair to and who you will shaft? That is, do you advertize and not deliver? If so, then, your website advertizement comes under the condemnation of being an outright lie. (<FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><B><U>www.pitts-tucker.co.uk/aboutus.html</U></B></FONT>) Or, as, at least <B>“negligent misrepresentation.</B>” Falsehoods in advertizing come under the <B>“Misrepresentation Act of 1967.”</B> You were supposed to tell the truth, not misrepresent it.</div> <bR> <div> Is your legal practice doing so poorly that it is not worth saving by fulfilling your lawful and ethical duty? Is it wise to throw away something of value you have worked for for years? Why not fulfill your “<B>undertaking,</B>” obey the <B>“Law of Property 1969</B>" and deduce a “<B>root of title</B>” as requested and required by the law? <B>No sane man would throw away his practice if he could prove himself honorable and honest. Or, could it be that you can’t prove the title of Halberstadt was legitimately conveyed? </B>If it were an honest trade, after all, there would be all kinds of ways to prove it really happened. It would be extremely easy! </div> <bR> <div> <B>Your refusal to come up with anything, is a sure sign that something is horrible took place–a major crime–you are trying to hide, because no one, who has half a brain, would throw away his career, chance several hefty law suits and perhaps have criminal charges thrown at him for nothing.</B> <B>Your behavior betrays you!</B></div> <bR> <div> The truth does not condemn the innocent. Only the guilty try to hide things. </div> <bR> <div> <B>The truth must be so incriminating and dangerous to you that you would rather take your chances violating the guidelines of your profession and breaking the laws of the land hoping that no one holds you accountable. But your quilt is eminently obvious and clear. Any jury would easily see this in an instant. It sticks out like a sore and broken thumb. It is as plain as the nose on your face.</B></div> <bR> <div> You have miserably failed so far to be ethical, fulfill your word, and follow the standards of your profession, but you can make things right, or at least salvage something, if you are determined to right your wrongs. I invite you to be an honorable man and prove you have some integrity and truth in you. This is an open invitation, but after six years of patiently waiting for you to treat me as duty requires, it is getting kind of infuriating if not ridiculous.</div> <bR> <div> <B>Your actions say louder than words could ever express that unless your feet are held to the fire, you will continue to ignore me and disregard the conduct that is befitting and proper for your profession. Very few others would treat me so in courteously or unprofessionally, especially give total disregard to  evidence of fraud and deceit as you have done. This is not what a solicitor should be like, according to the guidelines of the Law Society, it is more typical of a person who is corrupt, disdainful, arrogant and outrageous to the core, but hiding behind a mask of respectability.</B></div> <bR> <div> All I have ever wanted from you is for you to do your lawfully required duty. It is up to you. </div> <bR> <div> Sincerely yours,    </div> <div> Copy to:<FONT SIZE="4" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" > </FONT></div> <div> The Law Society of England and Wales</div> <div> Antonio A. Boada</div> <div> The website: <FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><B><U>www.phoneynobletitles.com</U></B></FONT></div> <div> Update to all interested parties</div> <bR> <div> <B>*****************************</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>March 22, 2006</B></div> <bR> <div> Dear Mr. Pitts-Tucker,</div> <bR> <div> I have sent you several letters lately to show powerful and compelling evidence of your shameful handling of my case and as a direct result how you hurt many others because you continued supporting a con artist in his ugly trade in falsehoods.</div> <bR> <div> I will show how the phoney name “<B>Peter Michael Hohenzollern - Saxe-Weimer - Civitella-Cessi - Lambrino</B>” was finally put to rest, by your client, to be a fake, made-up name and again invite you to rectify things.</div> <bR> <div> Getting no reasonable response from you, I hired two investigators who confirmed my opinion that the whole transaction was a big, horrible and disgusting lie–that is, it was fraud on the part of Mr. Boada. I put their report on the internet on <B>September 3, 2002 </B>and informed you of it. (See: <FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><A HREF="http://www.noblescams.com)" TARGET="_top" TITLE="http://www.noblescams.com)"><U><B><U>www.noblescams.com</U></B></U></A></FONT>) You as usual recklessly payed no heed to any of the compelling evidence and continued to help Mr. Boada rob, cheat and victimize more and more people. In fact, your lack of response was abnormal and way out of wack. It did not fit with the gravity of the situation in any way. No normal person would do such a thing.</div> <bR> <div> When I could see this flagrant disregard for the law or truth and justice, and the fact that you were not going to budge or change your course, I had no alternative but to appealed to the Law Society. Because you left me high and dry with only a worthless piece of paper. The title was unsupported. It had no “<B>root of title</B>” as required by law to prove it was authentic. In response to the complaint process, Mr. Boada months later wrote a letter dated <B>March 5, 2003.</B> You shared this letter with the Law Society and I received a copy of it from them. In it Mr. Boada let the cat out of the bag. He said that this “<B>Peter Michael Hohenzollern - Saxe-Weimer - Civitella-Cessi - Lambrino</B>” was a descendant of Ms. Zizi Lambrino. This was a whopper of a mistake, because he literally revealed that he was a liar all along. A lie that he made under oath in the November 2000 Statutory Declaration. He also had his partner Mark T. Williams fraudulently notarize this fake, made-up man on this same document as though he, the non-existent, phoney man, was real. That is, they colluded in an attempt to deceive me. </div> <bR> <div> Well, the reason why the truth finally came out is because the descendants of Zizi Lambrino are very well-known because of the controversy about her only son’s (Mircea’s) claim of rightful succession to the crown of Romania and lost property in that country. The fact is, Zizi Lambrino only had one son. His full name was Mircea Gregor Carol Hohenzollern Lambrino. Mircea only had two sons: Paul Philippe Hohenzollern Lambrino and Ion George Nicolas Alexander Hohenzollern Lambrino. Neither of these sons have any posterity. That’s all there is–three descendants. No more and no less. </div> <bR> <div> No wondered the above mentioned Paul Hohenzollern-Lambrino, through his Chief of Protocol, wrote he had never heard of such a person and that it was impossible that anyone called “<B>Peter Michael Hohenzollern - Saxe-Weimer - Civitella-Cessi - Lambrino</B>” really existed. Because he is a fake. Boada made him up. </div> <bR> <div> <B><U>The point is, “Peter Michael Hohenzollern - Saxe-Weimer - Civitella-Cessi - Lambrino” does not exist</U></B>. This is a very well-documented, undeniable, historical fact. The internationally known experts and genealogists were absolutely and totally right. The name was silly and absurd. It was full of nonsense. Mr. Boada misrepresented the truth in order to continue to scam me and others. But you, Roger, you failed to do your duty and check things out as required by the guidelines of your profession. I relied upon your promise and went bankrupt as a result. You terribly botched this case and hurt a lot of people as a result. </div> <bR> <div> Imagine a prominent solicitor of England and Wales, being legally responsible, being given obvious and compelling evidence of fraud, yet, in spite of it all, still continuing to encourage people to buy from a person who is a well-known con artist and who was continuing to perpetrate an ugly scam. Yet this is what you have done. It is loathsome and despicable.</div> <bR> <div> I used a fictitious name, a Mrs. Christina Fletcher, to see what kind of man you really were. I wanted to see if you would be honest or were still, after all the evidence of fraud and deceit I had sent you, going to promote a well-known con artist and who was continuing to perpetrate his ugly scams on others. I inquired, through this phoney name, about the validity of British Feudal Investments, Ltd.–the front organization for Boada’s falsehoods on 8/01/02. You sent her, this alias, a “<B>Letter of Recommendation</B>” saying, in effect, that Boada was squeaky clean instead of answering her earnest question as to whether you had ever, at any time, received any complaints about British Feudal Investments, Ltd. The Law Society has a copy of this irresponsible “<B>Letter of Recommendation.</B>” It effectively demonstrates who’s side your are on–certainly not the side of truth and justice.</div> <bR> <div> Many people relied upon you to do your duty to protect them against fraud as required in the guidelines, but you let them all down. You didn’t even bother to lift you little finger to check any of it out.</div> <bR> <div> But I expect you to make good your promise to prove that the Imperial Hohenzollern Family of Germany sold the Principality to me through Antonio A. Boada, the con man. Good luck, though. For if you fail to do this, it is an act of professional misconduct for three powerful reasons: (1) your “<B>undertaking,</B>” promise or guarantee, (2) your obligation to obey the <B>Law of Property Act 1969 </B>as the conveyancing solicitor for “<B>you knew or ought to have known</B>” that your client described you as such on his website, and (3) your “<B>duty of care</B>” to me and others because we relied upon you. Part of Boada’s sales pitch on the internet and otherwise was your reputation suggesting that all must be aboveboard because of your involvement, and “<B>you knew or ought to have known</B>”this. In addition, as stated over and over again, any reasonable person would have checked things out, but as a solicitor of the Supreme Court of England and Wales, you had an even higher obligation to do so–you failed to follow the signs given in the guidelines of your profession to avoid fraud from taking place. This is criminal neglect as far as I am concerned. </div> <bR> <div> Again, there is only one way to redeem yourself. Prove that a legitimate transaction took place. You are invited to fulfill your lawful and ethical duty as a professional. The deadline is <B>March 31, 2006. </B>You have already missed your opportunity to provide me with options and alternative ways of doing this as requested in my <B>March 3, 2006 </B>letter.</div> <bR> <div> I figure that Edmund Burke was right, “<B>All that is needed for the forces of evil to win is for good men to do nothing.</B>” I will not stand by and do nothing. That is not my style. You have wrong me. I expect you to make it right. The ball is in your court right now. I am interested in your response. Will you merely ignore me as in the past, try some diversion, beat around the bush, ask me for the proof of fraud again, threaten me or do your duty. </div> <bR> <div> All I have ever wanted from you is for you to do your duty. Your failure to comply will, of course, force me to take another step in my quest for justice.</div> <bR> <div> Sincerely yours,  </div> <div> Copy to:</div> <div> The Law Society of England and Wales</div> <div> Antonio A. Boada</div> <div> The website: <FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><B><U>www.phoneynobletitles.com</U></B></FONT></div> <div> Update to all interested parties</div> <bR> <div> <B>************************************************</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>March 20, 2006</B></div> <bR> <div> Dear Mr. Pitts-Tucker,</div> <bR> <div> Sending evidence of fraud to you in the past was like talking to a brick wall or a fence post. There was no reasonable and honest response to any of it. You didn’t take any of it seriously. This was irresponsible to say the least. No reasonable person would act the way you did unless they were either suffering with dementia or senility, were really thick or dim witted, or were corrupt, grasping and hard hearted. And if any of those reasons were true, you should be denied your license to practice and be blackballed from ever practicing again. There is no excuse for the harm you have caused me and many others.</div> <bR> <div> In this letter, I will focus on what evidence I sent you and your negligence in relation thereto.</div> <bR> <div> For example, after receiving the November 2000 Statutory Declaration, which centered around what I found out was a non-existent person named “<B>Peter Michael Hohenzollern - Saxe-Weimer - Civitella-Cessi - Lambrino,</B>” I started to investigate. I sent you on <B>12/08/00 </B>the comments of a number of people like the world renown expert Guy Stair Sainty, who wrote the book <I><B>World Orders of Knighthood and Merit </B></I>for the famous Burke’s Peerage and Gentry. (You can see his website at:<B> </B><FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><A HREF="http://www.chivalricorders.org)" TARGET="_top" TITLE="http://www.chivalricorders.org)"><U><B><U>http://www.chivalricorders.org</U></B></U></A></FONT><A HREF="http://www.chivalricorders.org)" TARGET="_top" TITLE="http://www.chivalricorders.org)"><U>)</U></A><B> He said the name “Peter Michael Hohenzollern - Saxe-Weimer - Civitella-Cessi - Lambrino</B>” was “<B>nonsense</B>” and who ever made it up “<B>must either be a joker or an idiot.</B>” </div> <bR> <div> The fact that a man of such high prominence was so adamant about the absurdity of this name should have been startling to you. It would to a normal man. This is where the legal tests of “<B>you knew or should have known</B>” or <B>“what would a reasonable man do</B>” applies. You failed both of these tests miserably. But there is a lot more evidence you are guilty of neglecting concerning this bogus and fraudulent  name.</div> <bR> <div> HRH Prince Heinrich Hanover said he never heard of such a man, the administrator of the Imperial House of Hohenzollern, at that time J. F. Von Strantz, confirmed the same. I advised you that Dr. K. McCann, the Chief of Protocol for HRH Prince Paul Hohenzollern-Lambrino of Romania, said the name was “<B>impossible.</B>” I also contacted Paul R. Ilyinsky, a prince of the Romanov family of Russia, since he was a former mayor of Palm Beach, and Mr. Boada said one of the stockholders in the Hohenzollern Family Land Trust, Inc., a princess of the Imperial House of Hohenzollern lived in Palm Beach. I asked him if he knew of this “<B>Peter Michael Hohenzollern - Saxe-Weimer - Civitella-Cessi - Lambrino</B>” or the Imperial Princess. He said it is extremely unlikely that a princess of the Imperial House of Hohenzollern would live in Palm Beach and he would not know about her. He also said this Peter Michael, etc., etc. had too many names, that is, the name itself was highly suspicious or odd.</div> <bR> <div> On <B>12/14/00</B>, I sent you the contact information for all of these people. On <B>1/7/01</B>, I send you the  answer of  “<B>The Institute of Heraldic and Genealogical Studies,” </B>a professional genealogical company of experts specializing in royal and noble lineages and I included their contact information. Their answer to the question was, “<B>Extensive investigations do not reveal Peter Michael Lambrino as a member of the House of Hohenzollern Saxe Weimer. . . .”</B> This letter was from Cecil R. Humphery-Smith, their Principal.(See: <FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><B><U>http://www.ihgs.ac.uk</U></B></FONT>)</div> <bR> <div> If this was the only thing I sent to you, and nothing else, you should have been alarmed, but you weren’t. Something is obviously, seriously wrong with your response. It isn’t normal. And it’s more than odd considering the gravity of the situation.</div> <bR> <div> On <B>2/08/01</B> at your request, I faxed you copies of some of the above–the letter from “<B>The Institute of Heraldic and Genealogical Studies,</B>” the letter from the Chief of Protocol of HRH Prince Paul Hohenzollern-Lambrino, and the letter from the internationally respected expert Guy Stair Sainty. On <B>2/20/01</B> your office acknowledge the receipt of this unmistakably compelling evidence of something being terribly wrong. Yet nothing happened. You didn’t seem to give a damn about how serious things were. How unreasonable, negligent and irresponsible can one get? You were very wrong in doing this and cost me a bankruptcy and who knows how many others you have hurt.</div> <bR> <div> Yet the Law Society guidelines for <B>property fraud (25.12), </B>incorporeal property in this case, directs one to <B>Annex 25G</B>, which states that you should, among other things, “<B>Verify the . . . bona fides of your client,</B>” especially when receiving such strong and obvious evidence that fraud might be taking place. Yet you never even bothered to check anything out. This is not just a minor foible, this is really big. You continued to support a known con artist in spite of being sent powerful and weighty evidence that he was indeed a liar and deceiver and gave out a fake name. According to the guidelines:</div> <bR> <div> <B><U>Any failure</U></B><B> [not just one, but any failure] to observe these signs and to take the appropriate steps [like checking out the evidence sent to you against your client] may be used in court </B><B><U>as evidence against you</U></B><B> if you and your client are prosecuted, or if you are sued for negligence.</B></div> <bR> <div> Now, if the above evidence wasn’t enough, on <B>3/30/01</B>, I sent you the words of the attorney and general secretary of the Imperial and Royal House of Hohenzollern that, “<B>HRH Prince Georg Friedrich of Prussia passed to me your letter of 20 March 2001. On behalf of the prince I may inform you that a Mr. Boada is completely unknown to him and that there exists not any business you mentioned in the name of his family.</B>” Obviously, Mr. Boada has not represented them. He had no legitimate authority or right to sell the Imperially owned title for the Imperial family as claimed. Which is why I asked that you send proof that the title was genuine, since everywhere I looked fraud and deceit were eminently obvious as the nose on one’s face as it were. </div> <bR> <div> On <B>3/31/01</B>, I also sent you the words of HRH Prince Michael von Sachsen-Weimer und Eisenach to again show that the name “<B>Peter Michael Hohenzollern - Saxe-Weimer - Civitella-Cessi - Lambrino</B>” is bogus–no one has ever heard of him. The Royal Prince wrote that “<B>the gentlemen which you inquired about seems to use a phantasy-name. As far as I know, this name does not exist.</B>”</div> <bR> <div> On <B>4/04/01</B> I submitted the name “<B>Peter Michael Hohenzollern - Saxe-Weimer - Civitella-Cessi - Lambrino</B>” to a the German-Austrian Royals Message Board. Their answers I sent to you on <B>4/05/01.</B> Some of their responses were:</div> <bR> <div> <B>I couldn’t find this Peter Michael [in any noble or royal genealogy]. Or his Italian name. So he cannot be a prince.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>Sounds like a phony who grabbed a random assortment of names from all corners of royal genealogy.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>The fact is this, that since these families are not related anytime in this date, it is probably a made up name.</B></div> <bR> <div> If the eminent expert <B>Guy Stair Sainty </B>wasn’t enough, another internationally known and respected scholar was contacted to leave you without excuse. <B>Dr. Pier Felice degli Uberti</B>, head of the <B>International Commission on Orders of Chivalry</B> said the name “<B>Peter Michael Hohenzollern - Saxe-Weimer - Civitella-Cessi - Lambrino</B>” doesn’t fit together and is nonsense. Both of these highly respected scholars either directly or indirectly presented the fact that anyone who was really a member of the Civitella-Cessi family would know that this name was spelled wrong and that this family never uses this territorial name. Anyone who was really a part of this family would know this. A real family member would use the <B>Torlonia </B>name. But the point here is, a fraudster, such as Boada, typically doing sloppy research, would make up an imaginary name, as he did, and thus expose his shameful and ugly deception.</div> <bR> <div> The ancient sovereignty of the Civitella-Cesi territory is owned by the <B>Torlonia</B> princely family. They were later contacted and they confirmed the same in a letter to me dated <B>October 2001. </B>This prince wrote, “<B>We are afraid we have to confirm your doubts because we have never heard the name of this person.</B>”  </div> <div>  </div> <div> So I sent you the fact that ever royal or noble family specified in this fake and impossible name have never heard of him. Two world renown experts declared the name not only to be faulty, but nonsensical and, therefore for all practical purposes, impossible. An institute of professional genealogists declared after an “<B>extensive investigation</B>” that no such person was descended from the Hohenzollern’s or Saxe-Weimer’s.</div> <bR> <div> In addition, Henri van Oene, a royal genealogist, stated to me on <B>6/27/01</B> that the fact that:</div> <bR> <div> <B>Peter Michael Hohenzollern-Saxe Weimer, etc. cannot be found among the Hohenzollerns or the Saxe Weimers, he must not be a Hohenzollern or Saxe Weimer, period. . . . Persons of royal and noble blood are not only registered in public records but also in publications as the "</B><I><B>Almanach de Gotha</B></I><B>" and the </B><I><B>"Genealogisch Handbuch des Adels</B></I><B>", it's impossible that someone slipped through.</B></div> <bR> <div> On <B>8/17/01</B>, you wrote to Mr. Branscum, the investigator, a very incriminating statement. You declared, “<B>You should be aware in England that a solicitor, or other professional representative, has a personal duty to satisfy himself as to the facts and circumstances supporting an allegation of fraud.</B>” Why in hell did you <B><U>not</U></B> do this? If this was your duty, why did you fail to fulfill your professional obligations? Why did you not contact these experts and check it out for yourself? Again, you are guilty of professional misconduct and neglect in how you botched this case. To any normal thinking man, such evidence would put them on alert and in earnest doubt about the veracity of their client. Not so with you. You did not investigate. You are guilty of misconduct and criminal neglect as far as I am concerned. You not only hurt me, you hurt many others. “<B>You knew, or ought to have known</B>” about this horrible and ugly scam. </div> <div> A reasonable person would have spotted it long long ago and taken appropriate action. But you did not.</div> <bR> <div> <B>But I am giving you a way to redeem yourself. Prove with verifiable evidence that you were honorable, fulfill your “undertaking” and provide a clear “root of title” showing ownership, and do it NOW before any of this comes up in the hearing against you.</B></div> <bR> <div> In <B>Stephen McPartlin -v- Robert Smith of February 19, 2001, Section 16, Central London county Court, ref: CHY99142,</B> Judge Roger Cooke demands that the following “<B>must</B>” be provided in a case of conveying of a manor or feudal title of nobility which are incorporeal possessions. That is, “<B>(i) that the manor [or noble feudal title] exists at all, and why; (ii), who the manor [noble feudal title] has been vested in [that is, who are the lawful owners and prior owners ,etc.]; (iii), how it comes to be vested in the vendor; (iv), [and] that the vendor and his predecessor have not conveyed it away. . . .</B>” This whole process must be “<B>open to inspection</B>” and “<B>rigorous research may be needed</B>” to verify that the root of the noble title is authentic and accurate. But, what Judge Cooke decreed in interpreting the <B>Law of Property Act 1969 </B>has never been complied with in your case. You never even tried.</div> <div>  </div> <div> Mr. Pitts-Tucker, I am not against you. I am not sore at you personally, but I am against wrongdoing. If you can come clean, well, that is enough for me. I am only asking you to do your duty. </div> <bR> <div> I would be amazed if you could prove that the title was legitimately from the Imperial family. I feel the odds against that are at least 91 to 9, that is, it is “<B>beyond reasonable doubt.</B>” I don’t believe you can do it. But your office made the promise (the “<B>undertaking</B>”) to provide the actual proof of this, so I am holding you to it–obey the <B>Law of Property Act 1969 </B>and your obligation to truth and justice. I am relying on you to do what is right, but I’m not holding my breath.</div> <bR> <div> So here is another invitation and an important challenge. If “<B>Peter Michael Hohenzollern - Saxe-Weimer - Civitella-Cessi - Lambrino</B>” is a real person, it should be very easy to prove. Just have him call the Law Society and have one of their investigators verify his actual existence and his connection to the Imperial family. It should be as easy as pie, if he is a real person. If he a figment of Boada’s crooked, scheming imagination, well, of course, then this would make it absolutely and completely impossible, because the man does not exist. </div> <bR> <div> If it is, indeed, a fact that the Imperial family gave the legal right to your client to sell the Principality for and in their behalf, it would be so extremely easy to prove it, so much so that if you do not do so, it is a clear indication that it is all fraud pure and simple. </div> <bR> <div> <B>However, the invitation is here given to prove yourself innocent of wrongdoing by providing irrefutable proof that could be verified and confirmed that the transfer of the principality was actually/truly conveyed by the Imperial and Royal House of Prussia through Antony Boada to me as claimed.</B></div> <div> <B> </B></div> <div> A reasonable man would jump at the opportunity to prove himself innocent. But I do not know if you are a reasonable man. So far things don’t look very good for you. The past has been bleak and unproductive. Everything points in the direction of guilt, misconduct and corruption.</div> <bR> <div> You have eleven more days before the end of the month. Use them wisely.</div> <bR> <div> Respectfully and sincerely yours,  </div> <bR> <div> Copy to:</div> <div> The Law Society of England and Wales</div> <div> Antonio A. Boada</div> <div> The website: <FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><B><U>www.phoneynobletitles.com</U></B></FONT></div> <div> Update to all interested parties</div> <bR> <div> <B>If you have been victimized by Mr. Boada, Mr. Williams or Mr. Pitts-Tucker, it’s time to make criminal complaints and sue them for the detestable things they have done to you and many others. It’s like the saying, “United we stand divided we fall.” Only when the authorities see that hundreds have actually been robbed and cheated, will they put a priority on this serious case. Go to “</B><A HREF="id58.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Answer"><U><B>The Answer</B></U></A><B>” for more information.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>Please read the "</B><FONT SIZE="4" COLOR="#BF0000" FACE="Benguiat Bk BT" ><A HREF="id33.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Disclaimer"><U><B>Disclaimer.</B></U></A></FONT><B>"</B></div> <bR> <div> <A HREF="id62.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor3"><U><B>Previous Page</B></U></A><B> / </B><A HREF="id64.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor5"><U><B>Next Page</B></U></A></div> <bR> </td> </tr></table></body>