Declaration of Ownership

<body topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 marginheight=0 marginwidth=0> <table cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0 border=0><tr> <td valign="top" colspan=2 height=90 BGCOLOR="#006699" TEXT="#080000" background="154fd5a3.jpg"> <div> <FONT SIZE="6" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" ><B>Phoney Titles of Nobility: British Feudal Investments, Ltd. Exposed</B></FONT><B>   </B></div> <div> </div> </td> </tr><tr> <td valign="top" width=210 BGCOLOR="#FFCC66" TEXT="#080000" background="155d2b03.jpg"> <div> <IMG SRC="157ae6c0.jpg" border=0 width="174" height="108" ALIGN="BOTTOM" HSPACE="0" VSPACE="0"></div> <div> <B>Justice is one of the greatest and most beautiful things next to life itself and the glorious principle of freedom.</B></div> <div> <B>This website is dedicated to bring some very despicable men to justice.</B></div> <bR> </td> <td valign="top" height=390 BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" TEXT="#080000"> <div> Declaration of Ownership</div> <div> <A HREF="index.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Phoney Titles of Nobility: British Feuda"><U>Home</U></A>  <FONT SIZE="4" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" >I </FONT><A HREF="id48.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="News"><U>News</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id47.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Summary of Theft"><U>Summary of Theft</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id54.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Boadas Foul and Deceitful Claim"><U>Boada's Foul and Deceitful Claim</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id55.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Core Issue"><U>Core Issue</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id58.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Answer"><U>The Answer</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id19.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Website1"><U>Website1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id20.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Website2"><U>Website2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id21.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Revealing Article"><U>Revealing Article</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Deceptions1"><U>Deceptions1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id25.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Deceptions2"><U>Deceptions2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id40.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Deceptions3"><U>Deceptions3</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada1a.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams1"><U>Scams1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id27.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams2"><U>Scams2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id29.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams3"><U>Scams3</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada___roger_pitts_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Proof of Fraud"><U>Proof of Fraud</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id34.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Accomplice1"><U>Accomplice1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id50.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Accomplice2"><U>Accomplice2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada26.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Fake Titles"><U>Fake Titles</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id45.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="New Discoveries1"><U>New Discoveries1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id51.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="New Discoveries2"><U>New Discoveries2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="roger_anthony_pitt_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor1"><U>Crooked Solicitor1</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id46.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor2"><U>Crooked Solicitor2</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id62.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor3"><U>Crooked Solicitor3</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id63.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor4"><U>Crooked Solicitor4</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id64.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor5"><U>Crooked Solicitor5</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id65.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor6"><U>Crooked Solicitor6</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id67.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor7"><U>Crooked Solicitor7</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id66.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor8"><U>Crooked Solicitor8</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id68.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor9"><U>Crooked Solicitor9</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id69.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor10"><U>Crooked Solicitor10</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id70.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor11"><U>Crooked Solicitor11</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id71.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor12"><U>Crooked Solicitor12</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id72.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor13"><U>Crooked Solicitor13</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id73.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor14"><U>Crooked Solicitor14</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id74.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor15"><U>Crooked Solicitor15</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id75.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor16"><U>Crooked Solicitor16</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id76.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor 17"><U>Crooked Solicitor 17</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id77.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor18"><U>Crooked Solicitor18</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id78.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor19"><U>Crooked Solicitor19</U></A>   |   <A HREF="irish_and_english_baronies.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Selling the Forbidden"><U>Selling the Forbidden</U></A>   |   <A HREF="antony_boada___roger_pitts_tucker24.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Challenge"><U>The Challenge</U></A>   |   <B>Declaration of Ownership</B>   |   <A HREF="id57.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Diversion Tactics"><U>Diversion Tactics</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id42.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Reactions"><U>Reactions</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id33.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Disclaimer"><U>Disclaimer</U></A>   |   <A HREF="id23.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Contact "><U>Contact </U></A>   |   <A HREF="id44.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Index"><U>Index</U></A></div> <bR> <div> <B>If you have been victimize by any of these despicable men, Antonio A. Boada, Mark T. Williams or Roger Pitts-Tucker, go to "</B><A HREF="id58.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Answer"><U><B>The Answer</B></U></A><B>" and learn how you can join in a class action suit against them. </B></div> <DIV ALIGN="LEFT"></DIV> <div> <B>*************************************</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>I am publishing the following "Declaration of Full and Complete Ownership" to alert any potential victim that Mr. Boada, nor any of his other partners in crime, have a legal right to sell the title of Halberstadt, not even the fake title of Halberstadt. It is hoped that this document will prevent Boada, Williams or Pitts-Tucker from perpetuating this same ugly crime on another human being. At least, it would open up the way for a nasty law suit against them if they did, which is part of it's purpose.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>I don't really recommend that you read this, because of the way it had to be written. That is, it can imply that I believe the title is true if you do not carefully read it. What it actually says is the Boada declares it is true. And if he is right, then he, by law, does not own it. I am the exclusive owner of the bogus title of Halberstadt. </B></div> <bR> <div> <B>The incontrovertible proof that the title is fake or counterfeit is in a number of places on this website.</B></div> <bR> <DIV ALIGN="LEFT"></DIV> <div> <B>Declaration of Full </B></div> <div> <B>and Complete Ownership</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>Introductory Section</B></div> <div> <B>     </B></div> <div> <B>WHEREAS, </B>the feudal <B>Principality of Halberstadt </B>was legally conveyed by “<B>Deed of Transfer” </B>to myself, (name redacted) <B>“with all Rights, Privileges, Honours, and Emoluments,” </B>through representatives of the heirs to the Imperial and Royal German House of Hohenzollern, who were the rightful owners, on <B>January 14, 2000 </B>according to the “<B>Statutory Declarations</B>” of Antonio A. Boada for the Hohenzollern Family Land Trust as stated and legally declared on <B>January 14, 2000, June 26, 2000 </B>and<B> November 5, 2000 </B>respectively,</div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS, </B>Antonio A. Boada took action in an effort to take away said Principality in late <B>2003</B> by writing to the Bankruptcy Trustee, R. Kimball Mosier, Esq., who was in charge of my Estate, sometime, it is believed, between <B>August 2003 and October 2003</B>, through the auspices of a defunct corporation entitled <B>British Feudal Investments, Ltd.</B>, which ultimately culminated in a court order, made despite my protest, that was approved on <B>November 5, 2004 </B>to permit the conveyance of the Principality to <B>British Feudal Investments, Ltd. </B>as requested by Mr. Boada,</div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS,</B> there is the real title and principality of Halberstadt, and the fake or phoney title and principality. The Court sold the latter or counterfeit, which is what I warned them and officially declared was going to take place. I made it eminently clear in my “<B>Objection to Motion to Sell Feudal Title</B>” that they were <U>not</U> going to sell a genuine or authentic title. What was sold would be totally worthless and bogas. Hence, taking the warning, the Court cautioned the Trustee to not involve the Court in the perpetuation of a crime. Therefore it was stipulated in the <B>February 9, 2005 Bill of Sale </B>that the “<B>Buyer [the non-existent and defunct British Feudal Investments, Ltd.] acknowledges . . . that delivery of the subject Property is “AS IS” and “WITH ALL FAULTS,” and that Seller [the Court] has disclaimed any implied warranties with respect to the subject Property [‘or any guarantee of authenticity or validity for it’].</B>” More than two/thirds of the Bill of Sale was devoted to legal cautions and warnings. Hence, it was indirectly recognized that all that was transferred was a sham as I had earnestly expressed to them. However, if Mr. Boada claims the ownership of the real and actual title and principality was transferred, then the following applies. <B>This is the basic premise for all that follows, </B></div> <bR> <DIV ALIGN="LEFT"></DIV> <div> <B>Section on Abandonment and Repossession</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS,</B> a “<B>Bill of Sale</B>”<B> </B>was made out, completed and legalized on <B>February 9, 2005 </B>by the Trustee, R. Kimball Mosier, Esq., selling the feudal Principality of Halberstadt from the estate of (names redacted) to said corporation, <B>British Feudal Investments, Ltd.</B>, as requested by Mr. Antonio A. Boada. And the case regarding the Principality of Halberstadt being fully and completely administered, was finalized and closed on<B>, January 13, 2006 </B>after all the final, required approvals. As a result, said Court no longer has any legal jurisdiction, claim, interest, title, rights, power or authority hereafter over said Principality or property, because the said Principality is no longer a part of the bankruptcy estate of the said debtors, therefore, it is a done deal. It cannot be reconsidered, because it is legally over with being completed, finished and concluded,</div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS,</B> back on <B>September 21, 2004</B>, Mr. R. Kimball Mosier, the Trustee of the Estate, submitted a motion for court authority to sell said Principality to <B>“British Feudal Investments, Ltd.,</B>” again, as requested by Antonio A. Boada through his attorney, Margaret J. Montalvo, Esq. This motion and the notice of hearing on the Trustee’s<B> </B>motion to sell said property to “<B>British Feudal Investments, Ltd.</B>”<B> </B>was<B> </B>sent to Antonio A. Boada and Margaret J. Montalvo<B> </B>on <B>September 21, 2005 </B>informing them that any objections to the motion must be received by the Court on or before <B>October 11, 2004. </B>It is important to note that no objection was submitted by Mr. Boada or his attorney to selling the property to<B> “British Feudal Investments, Ltd.,”</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS, </B> between <B>January 18, 2005 </B>and <B>February 9, 2005</B>–the actual day of the transfer of property, Margaret J. Montalvo and R. Kimball Mosier<B> </B>discussed in detail several times about the wording of the Bill of Sale including the possibility of changing the purchaser in the Bill of Sale from <B>British Feudal Investments, Ltd. </B>to some other entity or person. That is, even though another hearing could have permitted such a change of purchaser, Mr. Antonio A. Boada decided to go through with his original intentions to have <B>“British Feudal Investments, Ltd.</B>” purchase the Principality. This was a conscious choice based on a knowledge of the legal consequences as shall be shown hereafter. In other words, it was an informed decision made under legal counsel,</div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS,</B> the legal consequences of this decision were most profound and important. Because the corporation, “<B>British Feudal Investments, Ltd.</B>” is a defunct corporation that, in fact, never really existed. That is, according to the certificate of voluntary surrender (based on Delaware Corporate Law Section 274), <B>British Feudal Investments, Ltd. </B>declared that they had <B>“no assets and the business for which the corporation was organized never begun.” </B>That is, according to Delaware terminology, this corporation never did any business and voluntarily “<B>terminated its legal existence.</B>” In other words, it legally surrendered “<B>all,</B>” not some, but “<B>all of the corporation’s rights,</B>” which is inclusive to mean every single right it ever possessed, to the State of Delaware on <B>April 15, 2002</B> almost three years ago prior to the time of the actions of said U. S. Bankruptcy Court,</div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS,</B> a search was commissioned in <B>March of 2005</B> of all the states and territories of Canada and the United States and two hundred thirteen other sovereignties, territories and colonies, including all countries that are used for offshore incorporating, such as, Seychelles, and it was discovered that <B>British Feudal Investments, Ltd. </B>was not anywhere to be found. Hence, the great likelihood, as a result of this investigation, is that <B>British Feudal Investments, Ltd. </B>was never reincorporated and therefore does not legally exist as a legal entity anywhere on earth. Should Mr. Boada produce papers that suggest otherwise, there is not a jurisdiction on earth that there are not individuals (contacts) who will not be able to confirm or invalidate such a claim. This is according to a company spokesman that does this kind of specialized investigation. Therefore, any fabricated statement or document to the contrary that Mr. Boada might produced will be discovered and exposed for what it is. The corporation <B>British Feudal Investments, Ltd. </B>simply cannot do any business. It doesn’t exist.</div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS,</B> in several instances, the fact that <B>British Feudal Investments, Ltd. </B>does not even exist, and was never legally registered in England or Florida as required by law, was communicated indirectly through my website <FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><A HREF="http://www.phoneynobletitles.com" TARGET="_top" TITLE="http://www.phoneynobletitles.com"><U><B><U>www.phoneynobletitles.com</U></B></U></A></FONT> under the chapter entitled “<B>Accomplice,</B>” and directly to Mr. Antonio A. Boada, his Florida Attorney, Margaret J. Montalvo, and his London Solicitor, Roger A. Pitts-Tucker, by myself several times by e-mail. But most importantly, it was communicated officially in my <B>“Objection to Motion to Sell Feudal Title,” </B>submitted to the U. S. Federal Bankruptcy Court, the Trustee, Mr. R. Kimball Mosier, and<B> </B>sent to Mr. Antonio A. Boada, as required, through his London <B>British Feudal Investments, Ltd. </B>mail forwarding address, and to his Attorney, Margaret J. Montalvo in Florida, who represented him in this case, as well as all others required by law. In<B> </B>item number five, on page five of said document, I emphatically declared and<B> gave full warning that the title should not be sold to British Feudal Investments, Ltd., </B>because:</div> <bR> <div> <B>. . . this company was dissolved or surrendered in the State of Delaware in April 15, 2002 and therefore no longer exists. It is presently a nonentity.  (see enclosed corporate papers or https://sos-res.state.de.us/tin/ GINameSearch.jsp or call (302) 739-3073 & press 2)</B></div> <bR> <div> This is simply a matter of public record. Thus I made it eminently clear that there were serious, grave, far-reaching problems or legal consequences associated with the proposed action and gave them fair and timely warning,</div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS,</B> Antonio A. Boada, as the former corporation’s Secretary, and self-proclaimed Director, being fully aware and informed of the corporation’s non-entity status, knew that <B>British Feudal Investments, Ltd. </B>did not exist or had any right to do any kind of business transaction in <B>February of 2005 </B>and has not existed for several years. Therefore, he knew that it does not have authority to buy property for any reason whatsoever. In other words, Mr. Boada knew that said corporation was legally terminated or was dead and defunct at the time he requested in writing through his Florida attorney Margaret J. Montalvo that the Trustee convey said property or said Principality to this legally dead and non-existent corporation, </div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS,</B> despite my official warning not to do so, Antonio A. Boada, knowingly went ahead and did this anyway. He even reconsidered this particular legal point again in <B>February of 2005</B>, according to Mr. Mosier’s records, and then with the assistance of legal counsel, Antonio A. Boada  made a final, intentional decision to go ahead with the purchase of said Principality via the dead, nonexistent corporation. The whole point here boils down to this: to willfully sell the Principality to a non-entity, that is, to willfully sell said property to something that does not even exist anywhere on earth, as Mr. Boada knowingly did, is to deliberately and unequivocally throw away the property or put it into the public domain as discarded, dumped, disposed of, chucked or deserted property,</div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS, </B>according to the <I><B>Uniform Unclaimed Property Act (1995), </B></I>or in other words, the weight of decades of case law, the conclusion is that when a person actually gives up possession of property by such a deliberate and obvious act, as Mr. Boada did in this case, it is entirely sufficient and therefore conclusive evidence of an individual’s full and incontestable intent to abandon the property,</div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS,</B> said feudal title was completely abandoned on <B>February 9, 2005 </B>through the Trustee’s Bill of Sale, in the State of Utah, and said Principality was discovered, retrieved and claimed in said State, therefore, Utah abandonment laws would apply,</div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS,</B> according Utah code 67, the <I><B>Unclaimed Property Act</B></I>, a feudal title of sovereign nobility (said Principality) is outside all (broadly defined) legal definitions of tangible and intangible property affected by the law, without exception; hence, the property describe in this <B>Declaration of Full and Complete Ownership </B>is not, and never has been, subject to any kind of State custody, therefore, no State involvement is required to legally claim full ownership of said Principality under the law as it is presently constituted,</div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS,</B> abandoned property "<B>is deemed to have been returned, so to speak, to the common mass and to belong to the one who first assumes possession, . . . and the former owner can assert no [further] claims thereto.</B>" <B>(</B>Aigler, Rights of Finders, 21 Mich. L.Rev. 664 in William T. Fryer, <I><B>Readings in Personal Property</B></I>, 368<B>) </B>In other words, by law, custom and practice, neither Mr. Antonio A. Boada or his non-existent entity owns the said property–the Principality of Halberstadt, because, “<B>a abandonment of property or a right divests the title and ownership of the [former] owner as fully and completely as would a conveyance,</B>” or, as fully and completely as though it were sold and he or she, the former owner, no longer owns it or has any claim to it. <B>(</B>1 <I><B>Corpus Juris Secundum</B></I><B> </B>§12, n. 71<B>) </B></div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS,</B> under these circumstances, as quoted, the first finder of an abandoned or discarded object in both common and statutory law has a right to take possession of the same, above all others. Therefore, the first finder and claimer has, in fact, the highest right and entitlement to this property on earth. This <B>“Declaration of Full and Complete Ownership” </B>is my legal and rightful claim to that permanent right free and clear of all liens or encumbrances. Many months ago, I made my first <B>declaration of ownership </B>or claim to the exclusive ownership of said property and had it witnessed and notarized. As a result of these two legalized claims, the said Principality is exclusively owned by me, (name redacted) and neither<B> British Feudal Investments, Ltd. </B>or Antonio A. Boada have any further connection or claim to it,</div> <div>      </div> <DIV ALIGN="LEFT"></DIV> <div> <B>Section on the Legal Implications of Sovereignty</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS,</B> if the forgoing “<B>Section on Abandonment and Repossession</B>” were not enough to establish my total and complete ownership, there is another set of profound and far-reaching points that negates the jurisdiction of the Utah U. S. Bankruptcy Court and therefore invalidates its decisions, making it as though the said property was never actually taken away from me in the first place–their actions being absolutely and irrevocably null and void or of no effect. Thus further illustrating the incontestable fact that I, (name redacted), am the sole, rightful owner of said Principality. These additional important principles of law are set forth as follows:</div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS,</B> when the feudal Principality of Halberstadt was legally conveyed to me in <B>January of 2000</B>, it transferred <B>“all” </B>it’s rights. <B>“All rights” </B>includes the right of <B>“sovereignty” </B>or right to rule.<B> </B>Not<B> “de facto,” </B>or presently reigning “in fact,” but “<B>de jure”  </B>sovereignty, that is, “by law” or “by right” in this case. In other words, sovereignty <B>“</B>by law” or by rightful and legitimate claim was conferred or given in its entirety to me at that time,</div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS, </B>sovereignty of any kind no matter whether it is <B>“de jure” </B>or<B> “de facto” </B>is an international issue and cannot be ruled upon by a court of incompetent jurisdiction, such as, a Utah bound, U. S. National Court. Only a recognized World Court approved by the United Nation’s International Court of Justice or ICJ, could take proper jurisdiction. As a point of law:</div> <bR> <div> <B>[“De jure”] territorial States, kingdoms and </B><B><U>principalities</U></B><B>, as well as regnant princes, the pope, the United Nations, the International Red Cross, and the Order of Malta are </B><B><U>subjects of public international law</U></B><B>. (Stephen Kerr, B.B.A., J.D., LL.M., M.A.T. international litigator and full professor: Antioch School of Law, Washington, D. C. in an article entitled “Dynastic Law”)</B></div> <bR> <div> Therefore, the court decree of the said U. S. Bankruptcy Court cannot carry any legal weight–it’s judgment and jurisdiction being without any real merit, power or discretion in this case. Operating completely out of the bounds of its authority, the court order and bill of sale created by this court are effectively nullified. They have no validity, legal power or impact in regard to the principality in question, </div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS,</B> if the said principality was not a principality and this case had nothing to do with the fundamental international principle of sovereignty, which makes it subject to international law, then we are faced with the fact that the Feudal Principality of Halberstadt once existed in the past within the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany. Now to the point, it is a basic and well understood legal principle that a United States Bankruptcy Court simply has no right to make any valid legal decisions concerning the sovereign affairs and rights of another country, because it has no jurisdictional authority outside of the United States,   </div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS,</B> since the U. S. Bankruptcy Court cannot make lawful orders over the <B>“sovereign” </B>internal affairs of another country, especially over a kingdom and empire that no longer exists on this earth, therefore, it simply has no legitimate authority or jurisdiction to function, and its decrees are worthless in regard to the ownership rights and sovereign prerogatives of the said Principality of Halberstadt,</div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS,</B> in addition, the laws that apply to this situation are not modern, but ancient. Hence, the wrong rules were applied. A legitimate and binding judgment would have to use the proper laws to fit the case, which did not happen. This is just another invalidating point effectively demonstrating how this case was botched by ignoring important realities. The seminal point is, Westphalian sovereignty, or sovereignty that cannot lawfully be interfered with was in full sway or operative at the time this principality became an independent entity. This legal understanding that was created by treaty in the seventeenth century made a sovereign prince accountable to no one, such that, no one could legally or rightfully take a monarch’s title and right to rule away from him. That is, such a prince might lose <B>“de facto” </B>ruling rights by reason of a forced abdication or take over, but could never lose his actual <B>“de jure” </B>or legal and legitimate right to be the rightful ruler over his own property or his own territory. In other words, sovereignty was a sacrosanct principle of law in both the regnant<B> </B>and <B>“de jure” </B>form, and was considered to be absolute, indivisible, independent, exclusive, inalienable and perpetual unless given up voluntarily. Therefore, sovereignty, in such a case, is completely and totally impervious and immune to any interventions or judgments by any country other than it’s own and then only by the freewill consent of the sovereign ruler of that country,</div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS,</B> in summary, the U. S. Bankruptcy Court (1) was in violation of legal propriety by using laws that have no legal bearing, basis or relevance in regard to ancient “<B>de jure</B>” sovereignty, (2) it was, in addition, illegally operating out of it’s proper jurisdiction, having no authority in matters which pertain entirely and exclusively to international law and the jurisdiction of the World Court, and/or (3) it was also illegally functioning outside its authority in the sovereign internal affairs of another country–that of the Federal Republic of Germany, and lastly, (4) it rendered a decree involving the wrong century or period of time as pertaining to nations that no longer exist on a “de facto” basis anywhere on the earth. As a result, the U. S. Bankruptcy Court was totally out of sync–it was totally out of the bounds of its legal authority in its deliberations and conclusions, thereby, making them completely empty and useless. Being null and void, it means that the Court sale of the Principality of Halberstadt never legally or lawfully took place. Hence, any legal objections to the “<B>Section on Abandonment and Repossession</B>” are mute, irrelevant and immaterial,</div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS, </B>because there is no court on earth having proper jurisdiction in which this “<B>Declaration of Full and Complete Ownership</B>” can be legitimately challenged that would actually accept such a case (not the World Court, not the European Union, not the Council of Europe’s European Court on Human Rights, nor the Courts of the Federal Republic of Germany), therefore, this declaration becomes, in effect, irrefutable and incontestable. In other words, it cannot ever be annulled or made legally invalid except by its creator and author. Again, because it stands on immovable, solid legal ground and cannot be contested, neutralized, vacated or set aside except by its author, it becomes permanently binding and unalterable by any outside or external force except as authorized by the rightful owner of that sovereignty,</div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS, </B>the <B>International Commission on Nobility and Royalty (</B><FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><B><U>www.nobility-royalty.com</U></B></FONT><B>) </B>confirm and reiterate in their declared statement on sovereignty that once sovereignty is given (as in this case, where all the ancient rights were permanently and legally transferred to me) such sovereignty is given and extended forever, and it cannot be taken away by force or coercion. It is a fairly well-known, immutable international principle for a “<B>de jure</B>” sovereign, feudal prince or any other sovereignty that “<B>any agreement signed [or made] under duress [that is, any agreement made under protest or by force or even the threat of force] is void.</B>” (Article 52 of the Vienna Conventions of the Law of Treaties) In other words, another reason the Bankruptcy Court sale is void is that I was coerced against my express wishes and official protest in violation of International law. Therefore, the Principality was never rightfully or lawfully surrendered. This is simply a matter of public record. The point being, as long as rightful succession continues in a family, no uprising, no war, no revolution, court order or referendum can legally take away lawful hereditary regnant or “<B>de jure</B>” sovereignty. </div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS,</B> “<B>. . . A prince [holding true ancient sovereignty as I do] is more than a private citizen whose relations are governed by the municipal law of his domicile,</B>” that is, such a person is obviously subject to the ordinary laws of the country he lives in, but is above all domestic federal courts in terms of his rights to ancient sovereignty. It all boils down to the fact that “<B>. . . Princes of sovereign houses are 'international public persons,” </B>whether “de jure” or presently reigning. Therefore, only a World Court could take jurisdiction in such a case, and a World Court, by law and tradition, would always sustain, support and uphold sovereignty, that is, they would never violate their own laws. In other words, “<B>de jure</B>” sovereignty remains permanently intact in the hands of its owner and no power on earth can take those hereditary rights away. And if it were taken, it could only be done by an authorized World Court, and even then, it would have to be by the voluntarily consent of the owner of those sovereign rights, for good cause and not in violate any international law, such as, doing it under duress or by coercion. (Quotes are from Professor Stephen Kerr, an international litigator for the World Court in an article on “Dynastic Law”) </div> <bR> <div> <B>WHEREAS,</B> the U. S. Federal Bankruptcy court was clearly out in left field in a number of basic, fundamental areas and never had any rightful authority to handle this asset, therefore, its court degree is rendered completely and totally inept, empty, useless and of no legal impact or weight. That is, to all practical purposes, the Title and Principality of Halberstadt never changed hands, nor was it conveyed to the defunct and non-existent corporation specified above. Therefore, on this basis, as well as ALL of the above well-established legal principles as presented, absolutely no loss took place in terms of sovereignty, title, honor, or legitimate claim to said Principality. And if it did, which is impossible according to the above principles, the property was legally and lawfully abandoned, as stated above, in the “abandonment and repossession section,” and is hereby officially and rightfully claimed by this and a previous permanently binding declaration,</div> <bR> <DIV ALIGN="LEFT"></DIV> <div> <B>Conclusion: Resulting Legal Status of Property</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FOREVER KNOWN THAT</B>, I, (name redacted), declare under oath and the penalty of law that I am the true and legal owner of the said feudal Principality of Halberstadt and own without exception “all the rights, privileges, honours and emoluments” thereunto appertaining and retain it as my sole, exclusive and permanent property in perpetuity in favor of my heirs for both now and forever, or to alienate to whomsoever I will or keep as a permanent possession at my discretion, </div> <bR> <div> <B>BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,</B> that ownership of the Principality of Halberstadt, or Das F<FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Times New Roman CE" >ü</FONT>stentum Halberstadt, includes the exclusive noble, royal or aristocratic regalian right to personally, professionally or commercial use the titles of Prince or Princess of Halberstadt or any others pertaining to this sovereignty or the equivalent of such in any foreign language, with the additional right to use the prenominal titles of His or Her High Born, His or Her Serene Highness (HSH), or His or Her Most Serene Highness (HMSH) or any others pertaining to this sovereignty or the equivalent of them in any foreign language. And that no other person or group of people anywhere on earth has the right or is entitled to use the above titles of Halberstadt without the express written authorization of said owner.                    </div> <div> <B>BE IT FURTHER HEREBY UNDERSTOOD</B><B>,</B> that any violation or infraction of the above statement on the use of the titles of Halberstadt constitutes a legal offense or tort–a wrongful act, whether intentional or otherwise, in violation of law and is therefore subject to legal action for the same.</div> <bR> <div> <B>IN ADDITION,</B> this declaration contains the entire stipulations on ownership of the Principality of Halberstadt and may not be changed or terminated orally, but only by a written instrument executed after the date of this permanently binding declaration by the rightful proprietor of said property. This Declaration of Full and Complete Ownership consists of eleven pages. The Certification and Notarization pages are on page 12 and page 13 respectifvely.</div> <bR> <div> This document is written is such a way as to make it obvious that if Mr. Boada attempts to sell the title, and claims that he owns it, he would be exposed as the thief and robber that he truly is. </div> <bR> <div> Should Mr. Boada wish to invalidate the above "<B>Declaration of Full and Complete Ownership</B>," all he has to do is admit or own up to the fact that he had no legitimate right from the Imperial and Royal House of Hohenzollern to sell it, and therefore, he committed an act of fraud, pure and simple.</div> <bR> <div> Again, the proof that this title is a fake is in the sections: "<A HREF="id47.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Summary of Theft"><U>Summary of Theft</U></A>," "<A HREF="id54.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Boadas Foul and Deceitful Claim"><U>Boada's Foul and Deceitful Claim</U></A>," the "<A HREF="id55.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Core Issue"><U>Core Issue</U></A>," and "<A HREF="antony_boada___roger_pitts_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Proof of Fraud"><U>Proof of Fraud</U></A>."</div> <bR> <div> <B>If you have been victimized by Mr. Boada, Mr. Williams or Mr. Pitts-Tucker, it’s time to make criminal complaints and sue them for the detestable things they have done to you and many others. It’s like the saying, “United we stand divided we fall.” Only when the authorities see that hundreds have actually been robbed and cheated, will they put a priority on this serious case. Go to “</B><A HREF="id58.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Answer"><U><B>The Answer</B></U></A><B>” for more information.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>Please read the "</B><FONT SIZE="4" COLOR="#BF0000" FACE="Benguiat Bk BT" ><A HREF="id33.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Disclaimer"><U><B>Disclaimer.</B></U></A></FONT><B>"</B></div> <div> <A HREF="antony_boada___roger_pitts_tucker24.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Challenge"><U><B>Previous Page</B></U></A><B> / </B><A HREF="id57.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Diversion Tactics"><U><B>Next Page</B></U></A></div> <bR> </td> </tr></table></body>