|
Diversion Tactics
If you have been victimize by any of these despicable men, Antonio A. Boada, Mark T. Williams or Roger Pitts-Tucker, go to "The Answer" and learn how you can join in a class action suit against them.
*************************************
From the very beginning, Mr. Boada has been involved in evasion. He will not take " The Challenge." Instead of dong so he hides, changes the subject, beats around the bush or runs away. The following is about a recent letter he sent to another concerned victim. Does it surprise you that 99% of it is pure distraction? He will not address the concern that he is a fraud and has robbed this man of his money and given him nothing in return, but a fake, counterfeit title. This is so typical of him and his solicitor Roger Pitts-Tucker and his Florida attorney Margaret Montalvo. In fact, it is a common, textbook ploy used by lawyers to try to turn the tables and distract attention as far away as possible from the foul deed or crime that has been perpetrated. It is especially used when the guilty party has nothing substantial or no real defense for their crime. Diversion, of course, is commonly used by little children as well as adult to try to get away with the things they have done wrong. Those who are culpable employ this on a regular basis, while the innocent feel they have nothing to hide.
Deceitful Letter
The following is an exposé of a letter of May 11, 2004 sent to (name redacted) by the con man, Antonio A. Boada. Mr. (name redacted) is one of Mr. Boada’s former victims who also bought a phoney titles of nobility supposedly from the Imperial and Royal House of Prussia. He wrote to Pitts-Tucker a letter on his concern about the validity of his title of nobility he bought and received an answer from Mr. Boada instead. (see attached letters)
It is important to note that Mr. Boada beats around the bush and attacks me instead of honestly addressing this man’s very real concerns about the legitimacy and authenticity of the title he purchased. Over the years, it has become evident that Mr. Boada will do anything, ruin his own booming business, lie, distract, change the subject, anything, but address the core issue of proof that he is an honest man and ran a business that was above board. The reason is, this is his Achilles heel. He can’t provide the evidence that he had authority–the legal and lawful right from the Imperial Hohenzollerns to sell the titles, because that is his scam, his big lie used in order to con people. He made a huge amount of money through this kind of deceit.
The reason this letter is being exposed is because it is a good example of the kind of tactics Mr. Boada uses to distract people from the core issue of validity. In addition, it is important to demonstrate what a liar and deceiver Mr. Boada is in order to protect others from his ugly trade in falsehoods.
Mr. Boada starts out by saying that I contradicted myself. I never told the “British Authorities,” the Law Society of England and Wales, that I owned anything, but a fake title. This idea is really way out in left field. Why would I contradict myself when I wanted to convince the Law Society to pursued and prosecute him? This charge doesn’t even make sense when it is realized that the whole reason for my case against him is the fact that I was defrauded. But like usual, Mr. Boada makes accusations that are empty and without anything substantial to back it up.
So much of this letter is diversionary in nature. I hesitate to address the phoney issues he brings up, because that is what he wants. His purpose is to divert people away from the fact that he is a thief who robs and cheats and that nothing that I know of that he has sold is genuine.
I never planned to operate a business selling fake titles or to go into the business of fraud as he has claimed. That is not in my nature. That would be repugnant and ugly to me and go against everything I stand for. Now for the real story: I obtained a business license for a company I thought to call Honors and Recognitions in late 2000 to go into the business of employee recognitions. I professionally joined the National Association of Employee Recognition (NAER) and earlier that year I had passed the tests required to become a Certified Professional Consultant specializing in employee honors and recognitions through the Consultants Institute located in Princess Anne, Maryland.
If I had a true or real title, it could have helped promote or provided a platform for such a venture, but I didn’t, so Honors and Recognitions never got off the ground. It never did any business. It never made a dime. But I lost interest in it years ago. Instead, I have continued in my profession as a licensed therapist who works with troubled youth. I am still involved in this important work to this day.
Mr Boada is sometimes really thick, because he mindlessly accuses me of wrong doing by selling, trading or otherwise encumbering the fake title I bought from him. Logically if this was so, I would have simply told the Bankruptcy Court that I sold it and provided a bill of sale that I sold the fake title long ago and they would never have reopened the case. That would have provided a perfect reason it was not reported as an asset on my bankruptcy. But the truth is, I owned the fraud. And the real reason I did not report it was because it was just that–it was a fraud, a loss, a worthless piece of paper, and my Florida attorney told me that there was no chance of redeeming it through a lawsuit since Florida laws protect assets. These strange laws in Florida are the reason why O. J. Simpson hardly paid anything in the wrongful death lawsuit he lost.
I told the Bankruptcy Court the full and complete truth that the title was a farce–the result of an ugly scam and that Mr. Boada, the con man, was the offender and perpetrator. They believed me and therefore took precautions to prevent Mr. Boada from involving the Court in any of his new crime schemes pertaining to the fake title.
Again and again, Mr. Boada’s accusations don’t even make sense. Nor does he ever provide anything to substantiate his claims. This is so typical. It is a well establish pattern. Mr. Boada’s responses are designed to distract rather than answer Mr. (name redacted)’s concern about the fact that there was evidence that he sold him a fake and counterfeit title. Mr. Boada evades this expressed concern. He totally avoids it and focuses on me instead. The reason–it is obvious. He can’t prove anything is genuine or right or authentic.
Next, Mr. Boada claims I was offered my money back five times. That’s amazing. He used to say it was four times. The truth is he only offered it once with impossible strings attached. He wanted me to abandon all efforts to bring him to justice. He wanted to me to be muzzled and silenced, but how could I in good conscience allow a known con artist to continue to preying upon innocent, unsuspecting people and feel good about myself or the life that I live. There is no way I could compromise with this unthinkable and unethical proposition.
As long as I live and have air to breath, I will try my best to warn people about dangerous and despicable people like Antony Boada and his cohorts. I have quoted this many times, but it is a strongly held belief, “All that is needed for the forces of evil to win is for good men to do nothing.”
Again, Mr. Boada continues in his chosen path of distraction. None of its helps Mr. (name redacted) know if he was defrauded or not. But Boada being a real crook cannot provide any evidence that he is legit, because he is anything, but legitimate.
Mr. Boada then claims that I was involved in “extortion.” What does that have to do with Mr. (name redacted) having a real title or not. Nothing, but Boada really has nothing else to say.
Well, on the extortion idea, sorry, Charlie, you’ve been caught again. There is much more to the story than Boada is willing to tell. If I was trying to extort him, how come I wrote, “Let’s find a mutual answer to this irksome problem?” Does that sound like extortion? I ended the letter with, “Numerous different options and possibilities are possible as long as they contain these three elements.” Again, does that sound like extortion, or is it an invitation to negotiate and find what is fair. The three elements were (1) he must right his wrongs, (2) he must obey the law (the English Law of Property Act 1969 requiring him to prove the title is validly what it claims to be), and (3) he must make just compensation. Mr. Boada gave no response. He will have nothing to do with something just or right. It is not in his nature.
The 3.6 million dollar complaint or accusation is just another disgusting trick, another exaggeration and ploy to distort what really happened. I invite and encourage you, if you are interested, to read a copy of the original letter that was sent to Mr. Boada so you can see it for yourself and know the true story, not Boada’s twisted version. (see attached letter)
For example, he says I want five titles from him and yet I said that these titles are bogus. He is trying to prove a discrepancy or contradiction that doesn’t exist in order to discredit me. But to him is the real shame and reproach, for in reporting this, he dishonestly failed to tell the full and complete truth and is hereby caught in guile. (see attached letter) If you read the letter, I told him “if” he could prove the title was genuine, then it could work, but that this was impossible, so he should go to prison.
I look at this situation as being that simple. No reasonable person would pay me the amount I suggested in this letter. It was designed to tell them that they had done me wrong big time. And courts sometimes award large figures. It’s purpose was to open up their eyes, but that won’t work with dishonest people.
To continue, Mr. Boada says I have made “continuous demands for proofs” and that he “provided them.” How amazing, since he never sent me a stitch of evidence. Everything he has sent was so flawed as to provide evidence to the contrary. Boada writes, “nothing will satisfying his demands.” That is because he robbed me and will not negotiate about righting his wrongs, or prove the title was genuinely and legitimately from the Imperial and Royal House of Prussia as claimed. The point is, you can’t prove something that is totally false, is absolutely true.
Now for more distractions and diversions from Mr. (name redacted)’s concerns about the validity of his title. Mr. Boada claims that the "Florida Commissioner of Consumer Affairs dismissed his [my] case against BFI." Well, this is just another over-the-top exaggeration since the Commissioner was never involved–only a caseworker. And no one wins or loses a case. It is only successfully mitigated or it is not. The caseworker, Ms. Lipman, wrote to me on December 20, 2003:
Closing the complaint doesn't mean we made any determinations. All we do is informal mediation. We get your position in writing, that's what starts the complaint, and we ask the business for theirs. Once we get their position in writing we close the complaint. We don't make any judgments. We just try to see if we can help the two sides reach a compromise.
Sincerely,
Cheri Lipman
In this case, it failed miserably, again, because Boada and his Florida attorney had no intention of satisfying the complaint by providing proof as requested. Hence, nothing good or honest came of it.
Mr. Boada wrote of the Law Society of England and Wales that, “. . . the Lord Chancellor (Chief Justice Minister) has just revoked their self-regulating powers.” This is a real dozy. What a whopper of a lie! Call up the Law Society yourself and ask them. From the United States, call 011 44 1926 820082. You will discover a major Boada blunder–a whopper of a lie. Sometimes I wonder about Mr. Boada’s sanity. He sometimes makes the most ludicrous boldfaced, even idiotic lies. No, Mr. Boada, the self-regulating powers of the Law Society have not been revoked and you know that.
Now Mr. Boada attacks one of the private investigators by the name of Bill Branscum who wrote the report on Mr. Boada and Mark T. Williams’s scam. (see www.noblescams.com) This is just another example of one of many ways to keep people off balance and distracted so they do not challenge him about proving their noble titles are not just make believe or fantasy cake. Mr. Boada claimed that Mr. Branscum “work[ed] for the FBI but the record shows he worked for an interior decorator and moved approximately 10 times within a 2 years–akin to people trying to escape creditors or something nasty in their past. . . .”
Again, Mr. Boada is exposed for being a liar and making things up. Will he ever learn to just tell the truth? Please see Mr. Branscum’s website at www.oracleinternational.com/about.htm. He never worked for the FBI. He never claimed to have worked for the FBI, but the United States Treasury Department as a Federal agent. He never worked as an interior decorator. He has lived on the same block for the last ten years. Bill can be reached through his website. He is a respected and fully licensed professional in the State of Florida, which requires FBI criminal background checks. (licgweb.doacs.state.fl.us/investigations/apply.html)
Mr. Boada flaunts as a protection against people who complain against him for fraud a special “terms and conditions of sale” that supposedly gets him off the hook, since his titles of nobility are phoney and pretend or have no value. I’m surprised he brought this up, because it shows that he is worried and frightened enough that someone would catch him in his lies that he developed a “sales agreement” to supposedly shield him from criminal charges and/or civil litigation. But a “terms of sale” trick doesn’t apply when a crime so heinous and disgusting as fraud exists. In fact, just “negligent misrepresentation” of the facts constitutes a violation of the Misrepresentation Act of 1967 passed by Parliament, which was created in order to stop con men like Mr. Boada from getting away with murder, as it were, through sales contracts designed to be used as a legal maneuver or ploy to avoid punishment. This is no longer permissible, but Mr. Boada does not want you to know this. Mr. Boada is trying tell Mr. (name redacted) that it is useless to attempt to bring him to justice.
Mr. Boada boasts that no government or court has revoked or confiscated any of his noble titles. Well, that is an empty boast. I don’t know of any government that does that kind of thing. Nor do courts revoke or confiscate titles. This is just another ploy to derail. It doesn’t suggest Mr. Boada is honest. It just suggests that he doesn’t have anything better to suggest to anyone that he is legit. How pathetic.
He calls me “moronic and obsessed.” This is not new. He does a lot of name calling. It just shows immaturity and that he has nothing substantial to provide, so he again resorts to another base and petty distraction trick. He does this instead of proving that he is honest or honorable or above board. Then finally, after a mountain of diversion, Mr. Boada asserts, without supporting documentation of any kind, that is, without even so much as a scrap of evidence that he, Boada, had a legal and lawful right to sell Mr. (name redacted)’s title. That is, Boada says in passing, “We wish you to know that the title you purchased is completely and fully genuine.” But where's the proof? Where's the evidence? Where's the supporting substantiation that shows it? There isn't any.
99% of Mr. Boada’s letter was pure diversion from this critical and core issue. Yet he still skirts around it. Apparently he will do anything to avoid it--lose his business, etc. Because this is where everything falls apart for him. He can’t prove anything is real, because it is all a big criminal scheme used to defraud and trick people out of large sums of money.
It is important to note that not once does he show he is an honest man and sold genuine products. Yet, if he did prove his titles were true, his problems would simply melt away. No one would be after him. He’d be hailed as a hero and a great person instead of a notorious con man who robbed and cheated people. If he really was a good man, he would prove it and not leave his victims empty handed and unsupported. And all his legal problems that basically cost him his business would evaporate and disappear.
So there you have it, Mr. Boada acts like a guilty person. His behavior is so typical of a con artist. He evades the real issue. He loves to point the finger and say that his detractors are somehow the problem, instead of proving he, himself, is honest and innocent of wrong doing.
An honest man would be thrilled to show himself honorable and would do this in a heart beat. A dishonest man would hide the fact and divert all questions and attention away from and off the subject of proof just like Mr. Boada does. Mr. Boada creates suspicion by his behavior. He makes himself look like a charlatan. But, after all, that is exactly what he actually isa black hearted impostor and thief who cares nothing about how he has hurts others and ruined some.
Will he ever come clean. Not unless he is forced to. This is where you need to act. Make formal complaints against Boada, Williams and Pitts-Tucker. Eventually if enough of us do so. We will be heard. But if you fail to do so--just like the rapist, whose victims are too humiliated or frightened to complain, he will not only go scot free, but he will, in effect, continue to rape and plunder others. This is not in the best interests of society or decency. He must be stopped.
If you have been victimized by Mr. Boada, Mr. Williams or Mr. Pitts-Tucker, it’s time to make criminal complaints and sue them for the detestable things they have done to you and many others. It’s like the saying, “United we stand divided we fall.” Only when the authorities see that hundreds have actually been robbed and cheated, will they put a priority on this serious case. Go to “The Answer” for more information.
|