News

<body topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 marginheight=0 marginwidth=0> <table cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0 border=0><tr> <td valign="top" colspan=2 height=90 BGCOLOR="#006699" TEXT="#080000" background="154fd5a3.jpg"> <div> <B>Phoney Titles of Nobility: British Feudal Investments, Ltd. Exposed</B><FONT SIZE="1" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" ><B>    </B></FONT></div> <bR> <div> </div> </td> </tr><tr> <td valign="top" width=210 BGCOLOR="#FFCC66" TEXT="#080000" background="155d2b03.jpg"> <bR> <div> <IMG SRC="157ae6c0.jpg" border=0 width="174" height="108" ALIGN="BOTTOM" HSPACE="0" VSPACE="0"></div> <div> <B>Justice is one of the greatest and most beautiful things next to life itself and the glorious principle of freedom.</B></div> <div> <B>This website is dedicated to bring some very despicable men to justice.</B></div> </td> <td valign="top" height=390 BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" TEXT="#080000"> <div> News</div> <div> <A HREF="index.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Phoney Titles of Nobility: British Feuda"><U>Home</U></A>  <FONT SIZE="4" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" >I </FONT><B>News</B><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id47.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Summary of Theft"><U>Summary of Theft</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id54.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Boadas Foul and Deceitful Claim"><U>Boada's Foul and Deceitful Claim</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id55.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Core Issue"><U>Core Issue</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id58.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Answer"><U>The Answer</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id19.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Website1"><U>Website1</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id20.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Website2"><U>Website2</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id21.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Revealing Article"><U>Revealing Article</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="antony_boada.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Deceptions1"><U>Deceptions1</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id25.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Deceptions2"><U>Deceptions2</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id40.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Deceptions3"><U>Deceptions3</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="antony_boada1a.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams1"><U>Scams1</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id27.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams2"><U>Scams2</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id29.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams3"><U>Scams3</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="antony_boada___roger_pitts_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Proof of Fraud"><U>Proof of Fraud</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id34.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Accomplice1"><U>Accomplice1</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id50.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Accomplice2"><U>Accomplice2</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="antony_boada26.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Fake Titles"><U>Fake Titles</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id45.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="New Discoveries1"><U>New Discoveries1</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id51.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="New Discoveries2"><U>New Discoveries2</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="roger_anthony_pitt_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor1"><U>Crooked Solicitor1</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id46.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor2"><U>Crooked Solicitor2</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id62.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor3"><U>Crooked Solicitor3</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id63.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor4"><U>Crooked Solicitor4</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id64.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor5"><U>Crooked Solicitor5</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id65.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor6"><U>Crooked Solicitor6</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id67.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor7"><U>Crooked Solicitor7</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id66.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor8"><U>Crooked Solicitor8</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id68.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor9"><U>Crooked Solicitor9</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id69.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor10"><U>Crooked Solicitor10</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id70.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor11"><U>Crooked Solicitor11</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id71.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor12"><U>Crooked Solicitor12</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id72.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor13"><U>Crooked Solicitor13</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id73.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor14"><U>Crooked Solicitor14</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id74.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor15"><U>Crooked Solicitor15</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id75.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor16"><U>Crooked Solicitor16</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id76.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor 17"><U>Crooked Solicitor 17</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id77.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor18"><U>Crooked Solicitor18</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id78.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor19"><U>Crooked Solicitor19</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="irish_and_english_baronies.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Selling the Forbidden"><U>Selling the Forbidden</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="antony_boada___roger_pitts_tucker24.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Challenge"><U>The Challenge</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id60.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Declaration of Ownership"><U>Declaration of Ownership</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id57.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Diversion Tactics"><U>Diversion Tactics</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id42.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Reactions"><U>Reactions</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id33.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Disclaimer"><U>Disclaimer</U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id23.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Contact "><U>Contact </U></A><B>   |   </B><A HREF="id44.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Index"><U>Index</U></A></div> <bR> <div> <B>If you have been victimize by any of these despicable men, Antonio A. Boada, Mark T. Williams or Roger Pitts-Tucker, go to "</B><A HREF="id58.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Answer"><U><B>The Answer</B></U></A><B>" and learn how you can join in a class action suit against them. </B></div> <bR> <DIV ALIGN="LEFT"></DIV> <div> <B>*************************************</B></div> <div> Encouraged Mr. Pitts-Tucker to help bring Mr. Boada to justice. That is, such might be very mitigating or bring some relief to him in terms of the inevitable penalties he will be given by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. Mr. Pitts-Tucker is certainly not innocent, but Mr. Boada probably conned him as well and by his lies and deceptions literally ruined Mr. Pitts-Tucker's livelihood and business, his life-times savings and everything he worked for all his life. That is, Mr. Boada, being a con man, could not help but involve Mr. Pitts-Tucker in misconduct. (See "<A HREF="id78.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor19"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor19</B></U></A>")</div> <bR> <div> The November hearing of the <B>Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal</B> is getting closer and closer, so the last letter was written in the hope that Mr. Pitts-Tucker will help in the prosecution of Mr. Boada for fraud and misrepresentation. See: "<A HREF="id77.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor18"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor18</B></U></A>"</div> <bR> <div> Sent another letter challenging Mr. Pitts-Tucker on <B>October 12, 2008</B>. See: "<A HREF="id76.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor 17"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor17</B></U></A>"</div> <bR> <div> Mr. Pitts-Tucker still has not submitted his list of witnesses and their statements so another letter was written on <B>September 3, 2008 </B>to encourage him to fess up and tell the truth. See: "<A HREF="id75.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor16"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor16.</B></U></A>"</div> <bR> <div> The Tribunal date is still for November of 2008, but Mr. Pitts-Tucker has asked for an extension of time for submitting his witness list, defense documents and strategy again. On <B>August 3, 2008</B>, I wrote a letter to him on this. It is one "<A HREF="id74.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor15"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor15</B></U></A>."</div> <bR> <div> As it is a possibility that Mr. Pitts-Tucker must submit his list of witnesses and defense strategy before the end of <B>July 2008</B>, another letter was written and sent to him on this subject on July 3, 2008 (See "<A HREF="id73.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor14"><U><B>CrookedSolicitor14</B></U></A>")</div> <bR> <div> Another letter was sent to Mr. Pitts-Tucker <B>June 15, 2008</B> about changing the date of the Tribunal and advice on how he could make himself look good instead of bad by behavior worthy of the status of a solicitor of England. (See "<A HREF="id72.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor13"><U><B>CrookedSolicitor13</B></U></A>")</div> <bR> <div> It was discovered on <B>June 9, 2008</B> that the Barrister Mr. Pitts-Tucker had hired to defend him is no longer his attorney for an unknown reason. A new barrister and Queens Counsel was hired in his place. Mr. Pitts-Tucker also requested an adjournment till <B>November 18, 2008</B>. Ten or more days have been scheduled by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal for this hearing as it is considered to be highly complicated and much evidence needs to be presented allowing room for a defense. The Law Society has also hired a barrister and Queens Counsel to assist their very able prosecuting solicitor.  A lot of money is being spent on this important contest, which may show "<B>probably cause</B>" to launch an investigation of fraud involving both Mr. Pitts-Tucker and Mr. Boada.</div> <bR> <div> The last letter before the Tribunal was sent to Mr. Pitts-Tucker on <B>May 25, 2008. </B>At this time, it was believed that the Tribunal was still scheduled for <B>July 7, 2008</B>. (See "<A HREF="id71.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor12"><U><B>CrookedSolicitor12</B></U></A>")</div> <bR> <div> On <B>March 12, 2008, </B>I sent another letter on the fact that Mr. Pitts-Tucker still owes me the fulfillment of his legally binding "undertaking" that his firm gave me in <B>September of 2000</B>. (See "<A HREF="id70.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor11"><U><B>CrookedSolicitor11</B></U></A>")</div> <bR> <div> Another letter of invitation, clarification and incriminating evidence and suggestions was sent out on <B>January 26, 2008. </B>(See "<A HREF="id69.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor10"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor10</B></U></A>")</div> <bR> <div> Some new letters of invitation and incrimination have been posted. The lastest was dated <B>January 13, 2008. </B>See "<A HREF="id65.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor6"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor6</B></U></A><B>,</B>" "<A HREF="id67.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor7"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor7</B></U></A><B>,</B>" "<A HREF="id66.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor8"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor8</B></U></A><B>,</B>" and "<A HREF="id68.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor9"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor9</B></U></A><B>.</B>" Mr. Pitts-Tucker never ansers these letters, even the ones that asked him if he had any objections to this website. He was and is invited to demonstrate that any of the allegations were false or even half true. So the evidence and allegations stand unchallenged. The <B>Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal </B>will establish some of them and require somekind of consequences, which could be striking him off the list of those who can practice law. At that point the Fraud Squad of the City of London will take a lonk at the evidence for possible criminal prosecution. There is no statutory limitation on a crime of the magnitude that Mr. Boada and Mr. Pitts-Tucker were involved in.</div> <bR> <div> <B>December 15, 2007: </B>It is anticipated that the hearing against Mr. Pitts-Tucker before the <B>Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal</B> will take <B>10 days</B> and will take place in <B>July 2008</B>. The SDT is currently waiting for the parties to confirm their witnesses’ availability to determine if the hearing can take place from <B>July 7 to July 18</B> this next Summer.</div> <bR> <div> <B>November 15, 2007: </B>I added another letter of invitation to Mr. Pitts-Tucker, with incriminating information, to the website on this day. (See: "<A HREF="id64.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor5"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor5</B></U></A><B>.</B>")</div> <bR> <div> <B>October 29, 2007: </B>A preliminary hearing took place in which there was little agreement, so the prosecutor and plaintiff were given a month to find some agreement. A time slot was offered in April, but both parties requested a different time. Perhaps Mr. Pitts-Tucker's agenda is to delay and delay things. Time will tell. When a time is finally arrived at for the hearing of the Tribunal---it will be posted.</div> <bR> <div> I added my annual letter of invitation along with incriminating information to the website. (See: "<A HREF="id64.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor5"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor5</B></U></A><B>.</B>")</div> <bR> <div> <B>April 14, 2007:</B> The prosecutor for the case has recently submitted the approved proceedings for the <B>Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal</B>. Shortly a preliminary hearing time will be set up for the case to be tried.</div> <bR> <div> Right now, (<B>10/25/06</B>) we are waiting for the <B>Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal</B> to hear the case, which should be sometime in early 2007.</div> <bR> <div> As a conclusion to the four letters, I wrote a fifth invitational letter that shows what his lack of response means, that is, his obvious guilt. (See: "<A HREF="id63.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor4"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor4</B></U></A><B>.</B>")</div> <bR> <div> The fourth invitation which was sent to Roger Pitts-Tucker was sent on <B>March 22, 2006</B>. You may see a copy of it in the chapter "<A HREF="id63.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor4"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor4</B></U></A><B>.</B>"</div> <bR> <div> Again, an additional letter of invitation providing more proof of misconduct was sent on <B>March 20, 2006</B>. Again, no response. He was again merely requested to do his duty, but obligations and duty do not seem to be very important to him. But he might decide that obeying the law is important to him after all. Who knows? (See: "<A HREF="id63.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor4"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor4</B></U></A>") </div> <bR> <div> Another letter of invitation was sent on <B>March 17, 2006</B>. No response so far. (See: "<A HREF="id62.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor3"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor3</B></U></A>")</div> <bR> <div> On <B>March 2, 2006 </B>an open letter of invitation was sent to Roger A. Pitts-Tucker to right his wrongs. This letter was also placed on this website under "<A HREF="id62.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor3"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor3</B></U></A><B>.</B>"</div> <bR> <div> <B>January 2006</B> note that the title Mr. Boada purchased from the bankruptcy court is not his. Legally and lawfully he paid out $23,000.00 for nothing. (See "<A HREF="id60.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Declaration of Ownership"><U><B>Declaration</B></U></A><A HREF="id60.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Declaration of Ownership"><U><B> of Ownership</B></U></A><B>.</B>")</div> <bR> <div> The <B>Law Society of England and Wales</B> as of <B>June 2005 </B>has sent the complaints against Roger A. Pitts-Tucker to the Solicitor's Disciplinary Tribunal since the case passed all their legal and public tests. Mr. Pitts-Tucker was the primary promoter of Mr. Boada's sale in fakes and falsehoods--see "<A HREF="roger_anthony_pitt_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor1"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor1</B></U></A><B>,</B>" "<A HREF="id46.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor2"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor2</B></U></A>" and "<A HREF="irish_and_english_baronies.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Selling the Forbidden"><U><B>Selling the Forbidden</B></U></A><B>.</B>"</div> <bR> <div> In <B>May of 2005</B>, a new organization has appeared which I heartily recommend, it is called the<B> International Commission on Nobility and Royalty. </B>Their purpose is to promote the ideals of nobility, royalty and monarchy and certify the true holders of titles so the fake and the false can be identified and singled out as counterfeits. Their website is <FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><A HREF="http://www.nobility-royalty.com" TARGET="_top" TITLE="http://www.nobility-royalty.com"><U><B><U>www.nobility-royalty.com</U></B></U></A></FONT>. This is an organization that should be joined and supported.</div> <bR> <div> A new chapter has been inaugurated, because the time has come to unitedly start a law suit.  It also shows other potential avenues to stop this crime on humanity which would do so much to promote justice, one of the greatest things in life. See "<A HREF="id58.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Answer"><U><B>The Answer</B></U></A><B>.</B>" Also Mr. Boada and Mr. Pitts-Tucker are "<A HREF="irish_and_english_baronies.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Selling the Forbidden"><U><B>Still Involved in Fraud</B></U></A><B>.</B>" Both of these chapters were added in <B>January of 2005.</B></div> <bR> <div> In <B>January of 2005</B>, the chapters on Roger Pitts-Tucker were refurbished and expanded--see "<A HREF="roger_anthony_pitt_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor1"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor1</B></U></A>" and "<A HREF="id46.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor2"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor2</B></U></A><B>.</B>"</div> <bR> <div> Another new chapter was created in <B>December of 2004</B> entitled "<A HREF="id57.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Diversion Tactics"><U><B>Diversion Tactics</B></U></A><B>,</B>" being a response to another letter from the infamous Antonio A. Boada and his way of responding to critics. His tactics demonstrate his guilt. That is, guilty people use this maneuver on a regular basis, because they cannot provide anything substantial to prove their innocence. The same disgusting ploy can be seen in the chapter entitled, "<A HREF="id21.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Revealing Article"><U><B>Revealing Article</B></U></A><B>.</B>" </div> <bR> <div> A new chapter was created in <B>December of 2004</B> further demonstrating the ugly crimes of the three culprits, Antony Boada, Mark T. Williams and Roger Pitts-Tucker. It is entitled, "<A HREF="irish_and_english_baronies.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Selling the Forbidden"><U><B>Selling the Forbidden</B></U></A><B>.</B>"</div> <bR> <div> I added a new chapter entitled the <A HREF="id55.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Core Issue"><U><B>Core Issue</B></U></A> to ensure focus in not diverted from this central issue--that there is incontrovertible evidence that Boada is a con artist and sold fake titles.</div> <bR> <div> It’s kinda funny, but Mr. Boada, the con man, himself, just got ripped off. He obligated himself to buy a fake title as of <B>November 4, 2004</B>. In a Bankruptcy hearing, Mr. Boada put up $23,000.00 thinking he could trick or manipulate a Trustee of the Court into verifying and confirming that the title in question was authentic in order to victimize another poor soul in the future. But it backfired. The Court made the assumption that the title was a fake and a counterfeit without legally determining it either way. Authority was then given to sell the title to Antonio A. Boada, the perpetrator. But the Trustee was directed to make sure that the Court would not be implicated in or made a party to fraud in any way. Hence, Mr. Boada’s ploy failed. Now he has to pay out a lot of money for nothing. Backing out is simply not an option as he would lose face and end up confirming their misgivings about him. Therefore, the Debtors in the case won and Mr. Boada lost big time, but I can't think of anyone who deserves it more. This is, in many ways, the same thing as having a heavy fine, a $23,000.00 fine, placed upon him for revealing his deviousness to the Court chiefly through his endeavor to deceive through the sneakiness of his proposed <B>Affidavit/Statutory Declaration </B>which he wanted the Trustee to sign<B>. </B>But we are not through with him yet. I cannot say what is happening behind the scenes, but the prospects are looking better and better.</div> <bR> <div> Also, as of <B>October 2004</B>, the Legal Office of the Office of the Governor of the State of Florida has reopened the case against Mark T. Williams, Mr. Boada’s chief accomplice, in selling falsehoods. (see “<A HREF="id34.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Accomplice1"><U><B>Accomplice1</B></U></A>" and “<A HREF="id50.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Accomplice2"><U><B>Accomplice2</B></U></A>")</div> <bR> <div> In the middle of <B>October 2004</B> another letter from the Imperial and Royal House of Hohenzollern or Prussia was added to <A HREF="id54.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Boadas Foul and Deceitful Claim"><U><B>Boada's Foul and Deceitful Claim</B></U></A> as additional rock solid evidence that Boada is an ugly deceiver, an absolute and confirmed thief and robber.</div> <bR> <div> I added two additional chapters entitled "<A HREF="id51.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="New Discoveries2"><U><B>New Discoveries2</B></U></A>" and "<A HREF="id54.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Boadas Foul and Deceitful Claim"><U><B>Boada's Foul and Deceitful Claim</B></U></A>" in <B>July of 2004</B> to expose Boada's old book, <I><B>Upward Nobility!,</B></I> which recently came into my possession, and to refocus on his despicable lie which has hurt myself and others.</div> <bR> <div> Earlier in <B>July of 2004</B>, an individual sent me a letter he had saved from 1990. It was signed by Boada showing obvious fraud for over a decade. (see under the chapter entitled "<A HREF="id45.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="New Discoveries1"><U><B>New Discoveries</B></U></A><A HREF="id45.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="New Discoveries1"><U><B>1</B></U></A><B>.</B>"</div> <bR> <div> As an update as of late <B>May 2004</B> on the notarization fraud committed by Mark T. Williams see the letter that has been added to the chapter entitled "<A HREF="id50.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Accomplice2"><U><B>Accomplice2</B></U></A><B>.</B>"</div> <bR> <div> A landmark decision was made by the Law Society of England and Wales in <B>March of 2004</B>. That is, this test case against Roger Pitts-Tucker, Boada's crooked solicitor, was upgraded from technical misconduct to a criminal investigation.</div> <bR> <div> Another important development that took place later in that same month is, I made a formal complaint against Mark T. Williams, Boada's accomplice, for his misconduct and participation in fraud committed as a notary of the State of Florida. (see "<A HREF="id50.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Accomplice2"><U><B>Accomplice2</B></U></A>")</div> <bR> <div> As of early <B>February 2004</B>, I added another chapter on Roger Pitts-Tucker and his crooked dealings including more of his ethical violations or professional misconduct. He, with Boada, have robbed and cheated many many people. (see "<A HREF="id46.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor2"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor2</B></U></A>") I also added a chapter entitled "<A HREF="id47.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Summary of Theft"><U><B>Summary of Theft</B></U></A>" to help people quickly grasp the con they pulled off on me.</div> <bR> <div> Mr. Boada, being guilty, put a block on web archives about the middle of <B>December 2003</B> to stop people from seeing the evidence against him, that is, his own website was incriminating so he hide it. Of course, if it was innocent and honorable, there would be nothing to hide.</div> <bR> <div> A new Subtitle has been added entitled "<A HREF="id45.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="New Discoveries1"><U><B>New Discoveries</B></U></A><B>.</B>" It will contain current research findings in the ongoing investigation of Mr. Boada and Roger Pitts-Tucker.</div> <bR> <div> On <B>October 13, 2003</B>, a letter from Mr. Boada to one of his victims was intercepted. His letter is loaded with tall tales to deliberately deceive his readers. (see: "<A HREF="id42.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Reactions"><U><B>Reactions</B></U></A><B>.</B>")</div> <bR> <div> A number of additional noble titles Mr. Boada was trying to sell on his website have been shown to be false and fraudulent in <B>October of 2003</B>. (see: "<A HREF="antony_boada26.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Fake Titles"><U><B>Fake Titles</B></U></A><B>.</B>") Also additional research this month has exposed another ugly scam using a nonexistent <B>Rajah of Tambora. </B>(see: "<A HREF="id29.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams3"><U><B>Scams3</B></U></A><B>.</B>")</div> <bR> <div> The Law Society of England and Wales has asked that no more information be shared until on Roger Pitts-Tucker is properly adjudicated. A number of people have brought complaints against him for profoundly disturbing breaches in ethical propriety in doing business with and promoting a notorious con man, Antony Boada. (see "<A HREF="roger_anthony_pitt_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor1"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor</B></U></A><A HREF="roger_anthony_pitt_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor1"><U><B>1</B></U></A>")</div> <bR> <div> Mr. Boada finally took his whole and complete website down, not just his home page as before, but everything as of <B>July 30, 2003</B>. He apparently realizes he has been caught red handed and has gone into hiding like any guilt party would do. For he has no defense except to create more lies, and falsehoods just cannot stand up under scrutiny. All references to <FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><B><U>www.nobletitles.com</U></B></FONT> will not work anymore. (see web archives: <FONT SIZE="3" COLOR="#0000FF" FACE="Arial" ><B><U>http://web.archives.org/web//20001002095228/www.nobletitles.com/index.htm</U></B></FONT>) Mr. Boada, like the guilty dog with its tail between its legs, has run away. But the battle for justice has only just begun.</div> <bR> <div> Important news, as of late <B>July 2003</B>, is the discovery of new and important evidence of fraud and deception. The last five paragraphs of "<A HREF="id27.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Scams2"><U><B>Scams2</B></U></A>" shows one and basically the last seven paragraphs of "<A HREF="antony_boada___roger_pitts_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Proof of Fraud"><U><B>Proof of Fraud</B></U></A>" gives another. Both are major discoveries.</div> <bR> <div> Mr. Boada took his website down again as of <B>July 1, 2003</B>.  It was down for over seven months with the excuse that he was refurbishing it. Now he claims to have sold all his noble titles, which is kind of off the wall. That is, it is not too likely or probable that he sold 54 noble titles in four weeks--many of which have been advertised for over a year. Now as of July 7, 2003, he took his home page down.  For details, see "<A HREF="id20.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Website2"><U><B>Website2</B></U></A>" at the end.</div> <bR> <div> In <B>October of 2002</B>, mediation through the Better Business Bureau in West Palm Beach, Florida and the Consumer Services Division of the State of Florida was enlisted in an honest attempt to bring about a solution. The charge of fraud was conveyed and the remedy was for Antony Boada or Mark T. Williams merely to prove that one man's title was validly from the Imperial and Royal House of Prussia as claimed. The prediction was made in both of these complaints as follows:</div> <bR> <div> <B>Please be aware that Boada, if he will act in typical fashion, will be evasive, sneaky, distracting, beat around the bush, threaten, become indignant that anyone would question him, attack me, try to make me look ridiculous, do anything, but address the real core issue of proof of ownership as this would expose their scam or fraudulent activities.</B></div> <bR> <div> In fact, this is exactly what Mr. Boada did. Realizing that the Better Business Bureau and the Consumer Services Division had no teeth and were only mitigation services, the next step was to appeal to the Law Society of England and Wales. The Compliant was made against a supreme court solicitor and privy council agent, Roger Pitts-Tucker & Co. for the unethical practice of providing ongoing support and encouragement to an obvious scheme to defraud. This is still ongoing, but the Law Society has very limited sanctions it can institute. Nevertheless, since filing the complaint, Mr. Pitts-Tucker started a huge campaign to stop the investigation in its tracks via political maneuverings or bullying, rather than playing by the rules. It is amazing that such a man would rather be underhanded and use such reprehensible tactics than do the ethical, lawful and morally right thing, which would be to prove himself honest by obeying the law of the land--(<B>Law of Property Act 1969</B> passed by Parliament, and case law as in <B>Stephen McPartlin -v- Robert Smith of February 19, 2001, Section 16, Central London County Court, ref: CHY99142.</B>) That is, rather than do the right thing, he would rather be sneaky and evasive and politically push people around instead. Not a very pretty sight.  </div> <bR> <div> The law requires that he prove the title back at least fifteen years. The case cited requires this as well as His Honour Judge Roger Cooke declared  that the following “<B>must</B>” be provided in a case of title. That is, “<B>(i) that the manor [or noble title] exists at all, and why; (ii), who the manor [noble title] has been vested in [that is, who are the lawful owners and prior owners ,etc.]; (iii), how it comes to be vested in the vendor; (iv), [and] that the vendor and his predecessor have not conveyed it away. . . .</B>” This whole process must be “<B>open to inspection</B>” and “<B>rigorous research may be needed</B>” to produce the root of the title and modern law requires this. That is, an investigation of a title must now go back <B><U>AT LEAST</U></B> fifteen (15) years according to the “<B>Law of Property Act of 1969.</B>” This law and what Judge Cooke decreed has never been complied with.  </div> <bR> <div> Yet Antony Boada stated in a letter of <B>March 5, 2003</B>, that, “<B>. . .The solicitor need only deduce title going back fifteen (15) years,</B>” and “<B>Roger Pitts-Tucker, conforming to the norms of English law, deduces title strictly back to the fifteen years required by English law.</B>” Nevertheless, this is exactly what Mr. Pitts-Tucker will not do. When will this high solicitor obey the law of the land? Probably never, unless he is forced to. Why, because he can't. The title cannot be proved back to its supposed origin--the Imperial and Royal House of Prussia. Why? Because the title is as phoney as a seven dollar bill. Their claim that it is valid and legitimate is simply full of baloney. It is rubbish and they have conspired to commit this and many other acts of fraud. This is most certainly or by no means an isolated case.</div> <bR> <div> Conclusion: Roger Pitts-Tucker and Mr. Antony Boada are guilty as charged and are trying very hard to hide the fact as this is a criminal offense, punishable by law. Both of these individuals have a lot to lose, therefore, they are hiding and will not obey the law that requires that they prove the title is true. For details, see "<A HREF="antony_boada___roger_pitts_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Proof of Fraud"><U><B>Proof of Fraud</B></U></A><B>,</B>" "<A HREF="roger_anthony_pitt_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor1"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor</B></U></A><A HREF="roger_anthony_pitt_tucker.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor1"><U><B>1</B></U></A><B>,</B>" "<A HREF="id46.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Crooked Solicitor2"><U><B>Crooked Solicitor2</B></U></A>" and "<A HREF="antony_boada___roger_pitts_tucker24.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Challenge"><U><B>The Challenge</B></U></A><B>.</B>"</div> <bR> <div> Mr. Boada and Mr. Pitts-Tucker have been informed that if they do not obey the law by proving that the root of the title is authentic, that criminal charges will be filed against them. Meanwhile, the Law Society is attempting, despite political pressure against it, to render what limited puny little sanctions they may have at their disposal, if they do not succumb to the pressure of Mr. Pitts-Tucker's political might, instead of doing what is legally, lawfully and morally right themselves.</div> <bR> <div> <B>If you have been victimized by Mr. Boada, Mr. Williams or Mr. Pitts-Tucker, it’s time to make criminal complaints and sue them for the detestable things they have done to you and many others. It’s like the saying, “</B><B>United we stand divided we fall.</B><B>” Only when the authorities see that hundreds have actually been robbed and cheated, will they put a priority on this serious case. Go to “</B><A HREF="id58.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="The Answer"><U><B>The Answer</B></U></A><B>” for more information.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>Please read the "</B><FONT SIZE="4" COLOR="#BF0000" FACE="Benguiat Bk BT" ><A HREF="id33.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Disclaimer"><U><B>Disclaimer.</B></U></A></FONT><B>"</B></div> <bR> <div> <A HREF="index.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Phoney Titles of Nobility: British Feuda"><U><B>Previous Page</B></U></A><B> / </B><A HREF="id47.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Summary of Theft"><U><B>Next Page</B></U></A></div> <bR> </td> </tr></table></body>