|
Accomplice1
The Man behind the Man of Deception:
If you have been victimize by any of these despicable men, Antonio A. Boada, Mark T. Williams or Roger Pitts-Tucker, go to "The Answer" and learn how you can join in a class action suit against them.
*************************************
To best explain the culpability of Mr. Boada’s accomplice, Mark T. William, I feel it would be best to quote (with some minor changes) the letter I sent to the Executive Office of the Governor of the State of Florida, Notary Section in responding to a letter sent to them by Mr. Boada’s and Mr. Williams attorney. I made the original complaint against him.
Dear Ms. (person in charge of investigating):
My last letter to you was in response or in reaction to the prominent distortions and obvious or flagrant misrepresentations of Ms. Montalvo’s letter, which Mark T. Williams took full responsibility for. Ms. Montalvo’s letter was somewhat scrambled or disorganized. Therefore, commenting on it point by point, as I did, produced a letter that is also somewhat disarranged. This letter is to put all the major evidence against this reprehensible man, Mr. Williams, out in a more organized fashion to assist you in your decisions. I consider this to be an extremely important letter in regard to the outcome of this complaint because it puts things into proper perspective.
1. You have before you an important, detailed, unbiased, third party report of the fact that fraud took place and that Mark T. Williams was significantly involved in this crime. This report was written by two licensed Florida professionals who can easily be contacted by you. The evidence presented therein is clear and compelling and should have great weight in your determination concerning a man who has little honesty and would gladly participate in wrongdoing.
2. You have, as a major piece of evidence, Ms. Montalvo’s response letter dated May 21, 2004, which Mark T. Williams made a sworn statement that it represents the truth. This letter is highly incriminating. It is characteristic or reflects this man’s character--effectively demonstrating how far he will go to lie and deceive. It should be a weighty factor in your deliberations.
3. Mark T. Williams wrote a Letter of Reference, which is enclosed, that supports an ongoing scheme to defraud innocent, unsuspecting people of their money. Thereby clearly showing who’s side he is on. Therefore as an accomplice to a major crime, he is unworthy of any kind of public approval. No one in their right mind, for example, would put the Dracula in charge of the Blood Bank. Equally, a public miscreant should not hold the high status of representing the Honorable State of Florida as a notary.
4. This Letter of Reference is another powerful testament to Mr. Williams’ lack of integrity and failure as a human being to have any kind of decent sense of moral duty to his fellow man. It is full of deceit right from the beginning. First of all, Mr. Williams was not the Operations Supervisor. This was his first lie. He was a group supervisor in the Hollywood, FL branch. (see enclosed e-mail) The following was originally in the chapter entitled “Accomplice1" on the website www.phoneynobletitles.com with some minor changes:
Mark T. Williams (alias Thomas de Vere a Court), “Senior Feudal Nobiliary Advisor” of British Feudal Investments Limited (hereafter referred to as BFI) is Antony Boada’s partner and his accomplice in defrauding me and others of large sums of money.
Mr. Boada sent me a reference from Republic Security Bank, P.O. Box 4298, 450 S. Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, (561) 655-8511, signed by Mark T. Williams as Operations Supervisor (he was not the Operations Supervisor) of the Bank dated October 10, 1999. (see enclosed copy of the letter of reference) Banks, being very conservative, just don't give out endorsements like celebrities. This would be unconventional, irregular and highly unorthodox for a bank. No wonder Mr. Boada wrote in his March 5, 2003 letter that, "Mr. Williams may have stated more than it was then the policy of Republic Security Bank to say. . . ." And that is exactly the point.
In this dishonest letter of reference, Mr. Williams went beyond the bounds of propriety by represented this bank as saying that they held BFI “in the highest esteem,” which is untrue. Only Williams did. He stated that BFI had “a prestigious company history” and "has been in the business for 15 years," when in fact British Feudal Investments, Ltd. just came into being for the first time less than one month before he wrote the letter of reference. We have a copy of their incorporation papers and their dissolution papers from the State of Delaware. (see enclosed) This company came into existence for the first time in history under the name of British Feudal Investments, Ltd. on September 17, 1999. (see corporation papers) Again, that's not even one month before this recommend was written on October 10, 1999. Why the boldfaced lie? And being in business not even one month, am I to believe that they “won awards in excellence?” From whom?--the phoney Patriarch of Antioch that Boada created or invented as one of his cons to rob and cheat people with? (see "Scams2" on the website www.phoneynobletitles.com)
Then, Williams writes that they “have a record for honesty, integrity, excellent historical research and fair dealing.” I guess for not being a month old, they couldn't have much of a record either way. But they couldn't have proved themselves in anything. Reputations takes time and must be earned. But this letter is certainly flawed and contains exaggerations and at least one full scale lie--supported by the fact that they only started their website on August 2, 1999 a little over one month before they official came took over the corporation Yagan, Inc. and changed its name to British Feudal Investments, Ltd. in the State of Delaware. (see corporation papers and register.com paper showing when the website was started) So their record of honesty was tarnished right off the bat by a lie.
Think of it this way, British Feudal Investments, Ltd., although claiming a Palm Beach office, and doing much of their business there, were so honest and full of integrity that they never registered their company with the State of Florida as required by law, which also means they never paid any taxes either. (www.sunbiz.org/corpweb/inquiry/corinam.html) And also claiming a London, England office, and claiming to do business there as well, they never at any time registered in that country either as required. (www.companieshouse.co.uk) So much for honesty!
Running their company illegally and in secret, no one will question whether they needed to filed tax reports or pay any income tax. This is called tax evasion. It’s an old con artists trick. BFI also failed to get a business license in Palm Beach, Florida and their self-proclaimed offices were not zoned for this. Their offices addresses were in areas in which they were not permitted to do any business of any kind. (see letter from the Palm Beach Police Department)
Then Williams states in this letter of reference that they are “ the first and only company who were found reputable and solid enough in the feudal titles market to be able to offer title indemnity insurance coverage for the feudal titles they sell.” The problem here is Mr. Boada created his own title indemnity insurance company to deceive people in thinking they are backed up by a major insurance company. This statement, therefore, is highly deceptive and very misleading. Because the British Dominion Guarantee Insurance Company is an offshore corporation of Nuie, New Zealand that is run by Boada. We have a letter dated September 21, 2000 where he admitted this. (see copy of letter) And this phoney company, like other of Boada's companies, is operating illegally, never having registered as required by law with Companies House of New Zealand. ( www.companies.govt.nz) (for more information on this bogus deception, see the paper entitled “ Antonio A. Boada’s Websites for British Feudal Investments, Ltd.: Criminal Misrepresentations” or “ Website1" on www.phoneynobletitles.com) Did Williams know this at this time? I don't know, but as he became acquainted with the irregularities and revolting nature of his employer and personal companion, I believe, he apparently got too deep into the mire of crime and greed to extricate himself.
Later in the letter of reference, Mr. Williams wrote, “they [British Feudal Investments, Ltd.] have chosen us [the Republic Security Bank] as their banking institution in the Americas.” Perhaps they did for awhile, but this bank had to be bought out by a larger bank to keep it from going under, as I understand it, and Williams was required to stop sending out this letter, was sacked and made ineligible for rehire. Yet Mr. Boada trying to defend Williams stated, on March 5, 2003, that, ". . . what he [Williams] wrote in that letter is factually correct down to the last line." What a wild assertion! The problem here is that this exaggerated statement and Mr. William’s letter of reference are both factually erroneous and totally unreliable and irresponsible. Now if that was the only complaint that would not be so bad, but they were created with the intention to defraud.
But on the basis of this well-worded letter of reference, which I received over three years ago, and the high status and reputation of Roger Pitts-Tucker, solicitor of the supreme court of England and Wales (see "Crooked Solicitor1" and “ Crooked Solicitor2" on the website www.phoneynobletitles.com) , I was deceived into thinking that British Feudal Investments, Ltd. was an honest and reputable business. Therefore, I bought the title. Mr. Smith, another victim of Mr. Boada and Williams, was also sent this same letter of reference and purchased a title on that basis of the convincing effect of the lies that were presented in it. (see enclosed e-mail–you may contact him and check this out)
5. Another weighty and important point is Mr. William’s “over” reluctance to clear his name. This is a big red flag. All the legal problems, the so-called ruining of their business, the very real threat of prosecution and my publishing the facts concerning his guilt are because he will not prove the title is genuine. It is that simple, and as simple as that.
The point is, He and Mr. Boada, the con man, would rather pay me off than show themselves to be honest men. They would rather ruin their business than show they are honorable and above reproach. They would rather an angry client would publish the facts concerning their treachery than show they are honest business men. They will do anything, and I mean anything, and everything but prove their innocence.
This is not the kind of actions expected of a normal, rational human being.
And as to customer service, which is so vital and crucial to the success of any venture, they would rather that their customers are left empty handed without a leg to stand on with titles that are unsupportable and cannot be shown to be authentic or valid. This means the noble titles cannot be used or one become the laughing stock of friends and family and community. Boada and Williams do not care if what they have sold to people is flawed and defective and has no foundation or support and cannot be used. They frankly don’t give a damn. They got their money. Do you want such a despicable man representing the Honorable State of Florida as a notary? I think the decision is obvious.
6. Mr. Williams was and may still be extremely close–intimately close to Antonio A. Boada, who was his boss and homosexual lover. (see Investigator’s Report and enclosed e-mail from one of Boada’s victims on this fact) This created a “Dual Relationship.” Note the following was originally from the website www.phoneynobletitles.com in the chapter “Accomplice1:”
It is a well-known fact that “dual relationships,” such as what is described here, makes all that is professionally done suspect and open to question. This is because of the enmeshment difficulties, dependency problems and the blurring of emotional values, boundaries and loyalties that confuse all the important issues. Dual relationships are universally recognized as being very problematic especially negatively impacting impartiality and creating conflict of interest problems. In other words, a loss of professional objectivity, the compromise of high ethical standards and collusion abound in such relationships.
Hence, this is an important and significant complaint in regard to his involvement and lack of credibility, especially in notarizing a fake man for his live-in lover and boss, who is a well-known fraud. It is believed that he got caught up in the trap or mire of emotional and financial dependency and just got in too deep to get out. This does not justify his reprobate behavior. It merely explains how he could fall so low as to defraud his fellowman.
But because many problems exist in the State of Florida over notaries including the falsifying of documents, the State has an attorney and/or legal or educational expert to handle these complaints for and in behalf of the State. Their contact information can be obtained from their website: notaries.dos.state.fl.us.
The State of Florida officially recognizes dual relationship problems to the point that it is illegal for married partners to notarize for each other. It is equally outlawed for parent-child relationships, and an individual working with the American Society of Notaries told me that if homosexual couples were legally recognized in the State of Florida, then what Mr. Williams did would be in direct violation of the law for the same reasons that married partners and parent/child relationships are outlawed. (see: www.notaries.org) In addition, if Mr. Williams is paid any commissions in his employment with Mr. Boada that would make such a notarization unlawful and punishable.
Notarizing under the circumstances describe above is a sign of poor judgment if nothing else. His lack of credibility should be an important factors in your assessment about this unsavory man who has hurt so many people by his involvement in fraud.
7. The following is another original quote from my website from the chapter “Accomplice1:”
After I questioned Boada on providing proof that he actually owned the title or actually had legal authority from the original owners (the Imperial Hohenzollern family of Germany) to sell it, Mr. Boada eventually months later, sent me a “statutory declaration” in which a Mr. Peter Michael Hohenzollern- Saxe- Weimer- Civitella- Cessi- Lambrino declared that I had an authentic title and they (the Imperial Hohenzollern family of Germany) had legally and legitimately conveyed it to me. Mr. Williams had notarized the signature of this so-called Peter Michael, etc., etc. Afterwards, it was discovered that Peter Michael Hohenzollern- Saxe- Weimer- Civitella- Cessi- Lambrino is not a real person. In other words, Mr. William notarized a nonexistent, imaginary man who never lived and does not even exist.
Since receiving this statutory declaration, every head of each royal and noble family mentioned in Peter Michael’s various names was contacted including a genealogical organization specializing in royalty and two other experts. (see enclosed responses of most of these individuals) Each declared him as false, not of their family, using a phoney name or as highly suspicious or suspect. Guy Stair Saintly, an internationally renown expert in subjects of nobility and royalty, (see www.chivalricorders.org/index3.htm) stated that Peter Michael, etc., etc.’s name is “absurd” and sheer “nonsense.” One name is even spelled wrong. He told us he would be glad to testify in court as an "expert witness" that this name is fake and represents someone who does not and never has existed on earth. (see his website: www.chivalricorders.org/index3.htm) (see enclosed e-mails)
So we have Mark T. Williams, Boada’s accomplice in crime, actually notarizing a fraud, and by so doing, committed an act of fraud himself.
Now to a major point, why have Boada and Williams not just contacted this man and had him sent me a letter with his phone and address so it could be confirmed that he was a real, actual person? Why have they rather suffered their business to go to ruin than simple show they were telling the truth? What is their excuse for such nonsensical behavior?
The point is, what they have done is not what rational people do. It is what guilty people do, because they know that this man is a fake. They cannot prove he is an actual person. No one can. The man simply does not exist.
8. The most current act of deceit and treachery is adding a page to the documents that never existed in the original paperwork. But it should be obvious by now that such is in their nature. Both Boada and Williams live by deceit. That is how they make a living. As such, it is no wonder that they would act deceitfully and try to pull off just another robbery or twist the truth. As con artists, fooling the public is their stock and trade. This is just another in a long series of underhanded dealings for people who lack common decency and honesty.
As mentioned, a number of people have been supplied copies of the original Statutory Declaration long before Mr. Williams hatched up this new invention to derail justice. No such page ever existed in the original affidavit. Even in the unsigned and unnotarized copy of this Statutory Declaration, that was faxed to me by the law firm Pitts-Tucker & Co. about two weeks before I got the originals, had no such page in it. (see enclosed copy) This added page is an afterthought. I had no idea that he would be so brazen as to try to pull off such an obviously contrived maneuver or ploy. But this kind of dishonesty does not surprise me.
In fact, they tried this kind of thing once before. Boada, Williams and Pitts-Tucker claimed that there was a sales contract when I bought my title, which was supposed to say if I purchased, I could not make any complaints afterwards. Well, there wasn’t such a contract when I bought, but fortunately I had copied their website showing this was a false charge, and another victim of Boada’s, who bought a few days after my purchase, could also testify that there was no such contract. (see enclosed e-mail)
Because this man, Mr. Robert Owen Smith, noticed that there was no sales contract, he created one with Boada, and is willing to testify in court that there was no such contract at that time. (see his e-mail for contact information) About three months after my purchase Boada put a sales contract on his website and later tried to make it apply to my case. (see enclose contract and notice the date is more than a year after my purchase) (enclosed is a copy of part of Mr. Boada’s website about March of 2000 when I bought–there was no tab for a sales contract at that time. For comparison a November 2000 copy of his website is enclosed and shows the tab for the sales contract) These con men are not beyond trying to twist reality to defend themselves and make me look bad when they were the ones in the wrong. And they’d gladly lie to do so. They are as crooked as they come.
I could, if I were dishonest, produce a letter supposedly from Williams wherein he totally comes clean about his duplicity and the damage he has caused to other people’s lives. But such is not in my character. But it is in theirs and that is the point. Do you want a liar and a thief to represent your state as a notary?
The con that Mr. Williams has done in trying to trick everyone is so astonishing to me. It is it is too obvious. It sticks out like a sore thumb, what he has done. Dishonestly correcting things after the fact is so pathetic and lame that I can hardly believe Williams would go to such extremities unless he were really desperate. It’s just too easy to see through his ploy.
But if he were so desperate, all he would have to do to clear up everything is show that Peter Michael Hohenzollern, etc., etc. is real, and is a part of the high nobility of Europe as claimed. Why not have him call us and give us verifiable proof of his existence? Well, since he doesn’t exist, this option is not possible.
If this man, Mark T. Williams, were really sincere and cared, he would have avoided all of this mess, all the trouble it has brought, years ago instead of bringing upon himself business failure and possible jail time as well as heavy fines to compensate the likelihood of prosecution. He has brought about his own problems by defrauding one too many people.
9. If Mr. Williams responds to this letter, note again that he will do anything, but address the critical issue of proof. In England, there is a law passed by Parliament called the Law of Property Act of 1969. It requires that both real and incorporeal property (such as a title of nobility) be proven valid and authentic back at least 15 years. Boada, Williams and Pitts-Tucker have refused to obey this law. This is an extremely important law and so relevant to the present that I will show how it was legally interpreted to be applied. I quote from the chapter entitled “The Challenge” on the website www.phoneynobletitles.com.
For example, in Stephen McPartlin -v- Robert Smith of February 19, 2001, Section 16, Central London county Court, ref: CHY99142, the Honourable Judge Roger Cooke demands that the following “must” be provided in a case of conveying of a noble title or incorporeal property. (A copy of this case is enclosed) That is, “(i) that the manor [or noble title] exists at all, and why; (ii), who the manor [noble title] has been vested in [that is, who are the lawful owners and prior owners ,etc.]; (iii), how it comes to be vested in the vendor; (iv), [and] that the vendor and his predecessor have not conveyed it away. . . .” This whole process must be “open to inspection” and “rigorous research may be needed” to verify that the root of the noble title is authentic and accurate. But, what Judge Cooke decreed has never been complied with. But it could be. And that is the challenge for Mr. Boada, Roger Pitts-Tucker and British Feudal Investments. In other words, Mr. Boada could prove himself to be an honest and honorable man if he wanted too. In other words, the question is not, could he obey the law and do what is right? The question is, will he do so? He obviously should. And that is the challenge.
There is a saying, “where there’s a will, there’s a way.” The problem is, there is no will, no desire to make things right. Mr. Boada and his solicitor are not very nice people. Even though many alternatives and options to accomplish this were presented to Mr. Boada and Mr. Pitts-Tucker over the years, such that, if they wanted to find a way, they could have, they have always declined. It appears they would rather buy me off or shut me up. Why?--because they cannot prove they run a legitimate business.
While there is no evidence that they conveyed a true and genuine title to me, there is plenty of compelling evidence that it is false and fraudulent to the point of being beyond any reasonable doubt that fraud took place (see the paper entitled “ Proof of Fraud: The Ugly Truth” with substantiating documents or the chapter entitled “ Proof of Fraud” on the website www.phoneynobletitles.com)
Note that neither Mr. Boada, Mr. Williams or Mr. Pitts-Tucker will address their major shortfall of providing a shred of evidence that they were ever at any time, the good guys or had any integrity. This at the core of my complaint against them. As far as I am concerned, they either provide evidence of validity or they should go to prison. I will not be muzzled when they have robbed and cheated not only me, but probably hundreds of others. I concluded my last chapter with the following:
They [Boada, Williams and Pitts-Tucker] have probably hurt more people than anyone else in the history of this kind of criminal fraud–the selling phoney titles of nobility, and as such, have left an ugly mark upon humanity that cries out for justice. Remember, "all that is needed for the forces of evil to win is for good men to do nothing."
It is time that these men paid for their crimes. They have operate outside of the law, therefore they are outlaws. Hopefully you will have the courage to do what any decent person would, if they were in a position to do so, against those who break the law, lie and cheat and rob their fellow man.
SUMMARY: The following major points were discussed:
1. You have an objective third party report, the Investigator’s Report, before you demonstrating fraud and the breaking of numerous State and Federal laws. This report was written by licensed professionals and it showed that Mark T. Williams was significantly involved in this crime against me selling a fake title of nobility.
2. You have Ms. Montalvo’s letter, which Williams took full responsibility for, as a powerful witness of dishonesty and distortion.
3 and 4. Further, you have Mr. William’s Letter of Reference which is also full of prevarication and outright lies designed to deceive and fool people into buying falsehoods. He works for a notorious con artist.
5. You have the witness of Mr. Williams bazaar and irrational behavior. That is, he would rather destroy his company and reputation and perhaps go to prison than provide any proof that he is honest or an honorable business man. It would be kinder and indeed a lot smarter to just provide proof, as asked for, but since there isn’t any, because it was fraud, then the appropriate action would be to do what he has done to try to get away with having committed a major felony.
6. We have all the serious problems of credibility, loss of objectivity, the blurring of normal boundaries and compromise typical of dual relationships where Mr. Williams is dependent financially and emotionally on his live in boss, employer and lover.
7. Mr. Williams notarized the signature of a man that doesn’t even exist and has never existed, but was a made up fake person. The proof amply demonstrates this as a fact. And if this fake man Peter Michael, etc. was real, why not have him contact us with his address and phone etc. so he can be confirmed as real. This would have stopped all the serious and complicated problems he has–total business failure, etc., but then again, since there is no such a person, he cannot produce him and must suffer the consequences. But his behavior is a powerful witness of his pernicious work as the chief accomplice of a major scam artist.
8. The adding of a nonexistent page to the Statutory Declaration as a ploy he expects us to believe is another nail in his casket as it were. He must think we are simpletons to believe it, but that is what he has done. The scriptures say, “By their fruits ye shall know them.” Mr. Williams’ behavior is that of a guilty man.
9. Boada and Williams have disobeyed a major English law. Why? Because they are lawless men and lack scruples or those qualities of decency and honesty that make men great and good, inside and out. These men rob and steal, deceive and damage other peoples lives with no remorse or conscience. If they were good men, they would obey the law and prove their innocence by providing evidence that Peter Michael Hohenzollern, etc., etc. really/actually exists and the Imperial Family of Prussia actually conveyed their title to me through Antonio A. Boada. But you can’t prove a lie. Therefore, note that the crucial core issue of proof and validity will be neglected or circumvented or ignored at all costs. They can lie and cheat, but the one thing they cannot do is prove a falsehood is true and right and good, even if they are supposed to by the Law of Property Act.
CONCLUSION: Mark T. Williams is a low life, who has been a parasite, living off of peoples misfortunes–misfortunes that he helped create. He is a man of little or no integrity and has wronged me and many others. The evidence powerfully shows no sign of changing or righting his wrongs. Instead, he has invented a “new” harebrained scheme (the added page) to delude and deceive others. The problem is, it is easy to see through. He’s been caught with his hand in the cookie jar. Only this is an act of criminal deception worthy of prison.
I am going to send these proceedings (letters, enclosures, etc.) to the American Society of Notaries, the National Notary Association, the National Association of Civil Law Notaries, and the United States Notary Association, so they can see how low some notaries can get.
Mr. Williams should be disbarred and black balled from ever being a notary again. His crimes are too great to go unnoticed. Criminal charges should be preferred against this despicable man.
Notwithstanding all the problems Mr. Williams has caused me, I wrote in my official complaint to the Florida State Consumer Services Division, which is a mitigation service to help parties find solutions to their problems, the following:
What would satisfy the complaint:
What would satisfy me is if Mr. Williams would provide irrefutable proof, so the title can be verified and confirmed as authentic and true, that is, that the title was actually/truly conveyed by senior members of the Imperial Hohenzollern Family of Germany–the Royal and Imperial House of Prussia through Antony Boada to me as they have claimed.
If Mr. Williams would fulfill this request he would demonstrated most effectively that British Feudal Investments, Ltd. truly has "a record for honesty, integrity, excellent historical research and fair dealing.” But as it stands right now, Mr. Williams is one of the most powerful witnesses that his letter of reference was a real farce and Mr. Boada cannot be trusted.
If you have been victimized by Mr. Boada, Mr. Williams or Mr. Pitts-Tucker, it’s time to make criminal complaints and sue them for the detestable things they have done to you and many others. It’s like the saying, “United we stand divided we fall.” Only when the authorities see that hundreds have actually been robbed and cheated, will they put a priority on this serious case. Go to “The Answer” for more information.
|