|
Justice is one of the greatest and most beautiful things next to life itself and the glorious principle of freedom.
This website is dedicated to bring some very despicable men to justice.
|
Deceptions2
A Twisted Mentality Consistently Lies continued:
If you have been victimize by any of these despicable men, Antonio A. Boada, Mark T. Williams or Roger Pitts-Tucker, go to "The Answer" and learn how you can join in a class action suit against them.
*************************************
Mr. Boada wrote to one of his victims on April 21, 2000 and signed it as “Antony, Lord of Chafford, LL.B., Ambassador-at-Large, Republic of Liberia.” When sending him money for the two phoney knighthoods on April 14, 2000, Mr. Boada instructed him to address the letter with the title “The Ambassador.” Yes, this phoney actually claims to be an Ambassador of a tiny little unstable, third world country in Africa that is noted for corruption. In fact, he still claims this distinction even though, it is a false claim. The January 15, 2003 edition of “Condo News” of the Palm Beach, Florida area on page 3 shows a lady, who is a baroness and turning 100 years old. The article states that she received birthday greetings from “Ambassador Antony Boada.” (www.condonewsonline.com/local_news.htm)
But if he is a real ambassador, how come United States State Department has no knowledge of an Antony Boada being an ambassador for any country on earth. And why is it that both the Washington and New York Consulates for the Republic of Liberia have no knowledge of this man. Florence, who was personal secretary to the Ambassador in Washington for this country, can verify that the Embassy also checked with the Foreign Minister’s Office in their capital of Monrovia and could not find any record of an Antony Boada ever being an ambassador or representative of any kind. She can be contacted through the Embassy of Liberia, 5201 16th Street SW, Washington, D.C. 20011.
An article from the Miami New Times, which has won over 30 national recognitions for excellence in journalism, shows what a strange and crooked man Mr. Boada is in an article entitled, “Diplomatic Impunity.” (see: www.miaminewtimes.com/issues/1997-07-24/feature.html/1/index.html) On page 3, it describes that how Antony Boada, also known as Alexander Antony Boada Cartaya, supposedly had been appointed “Ambassador-at-Large and Minister Plenipotentiary” of the Republic of Liberia. On page 8, it introduces “Konah Blackett, the highest-ranking Liberian official serving the United States. . . . Liberia’s trade minister,” who was present at Boada's inauguration celebration and actually believed it was real. However, two weeks later, because Mr. Boada’s behavior was so odd and over-the-top, he decided he had better check things out. Mr. Blackett did so and explained on the phone to the reporter that:
He [Mr. Boada] is not the ambassador, he doesn’t have documentation. Liberia doesn’t have any representative in Florida. We don’t have one now, and we don’t have plans in the immediate future to do anything in Florida. And if we decide to have an ambassador, we will make sure it is done properly. Three years ago a guy flew into Miami from Canada and said the same thing, that he was the ambassador from Liberia. Apparently Miami is the hot spot for this kind of thing. (p. 13)
In a letter from Margaret Montalvo, Esq. on January 27, 2003, it is admitted that Boada still claims he is an ambassador. A letter of appointment was produced and I was encouraged to "contact the Liberian government" about it. I did so and was informed that it was invalid for one of two reasons (1) the signer was from a former fallen government, and if it was valid, the appointment was not renewed as required, therefore his claim is a farce and he is an imposter for still claiming to be an ambassador, and (2) they had a scam going on back then, that is, a lot of corruption existed, and some high ranking people were selling phoney ambassadorships. This is what probably happened to Boada. Yes, it looks like the notorious seller of fake titles of nobility bought a phoney title himself. The problem here is he dishonestly still claims his phoney title despite the fact that the Liberian government cannot and will not support his false his claim. They have no knowledge or record of him. But it is no surprise that a liar would be involved in a charade. He makes a living exploiting people or taking unfair advantage through contrived or erroneous appearances.
Mr. Boada sent me an e-mail on April 5, 2000 and stated that I could become knighted in “The Most Noble Patriarchal Order of St. Mary” of the Patriarch of Antioch for $2,000.00. He wrote that this group was “completely recognized by the Spanish king who is the number one ‘card holder’ of the Order.” He stated that I “would be winning over not just the Patriarch, but also the Spanish Royal Family in the future, and it is tax deductible. It would also accomplish a Royal recognition from an existing monarchy of your Princely titles.” He also promised a “a fantastically impressive document,” that was even “in gold leaf,” and it would have the signature of HRH “Prince Francisco de Borbon y Bourbon, Duke of Seville,” a first cousin of HM King Carlos I of Spain on it. But when the certificate finally came, it was not a “very majestic certificate” with “gold leaf,” nor did it have the Prince’s signature as promised.
But more important than any of that, I wrote to Domingo Martinez Palomo, the Personal Secretary of King Carlos I of Spain and inquired if this Order was truly recognized by the royal family as Mr. Boada claimed. Mr. Palomo wrote back on May 18, 2001, and, in no uncertain terms, said it was totally illegal and lacked all validity in Spain where this “Spanish Order,” according the Mr. Boada, was supposedly headquartered and where the certificate says it was signed, that is, in Madrid on May 21, 2000. Mr. Palomo also stated this Order had no connection to the royal family, which is not surprising since the King’s Catholic connections will not allow him to support an ecumenical order, especially an illegal one. In other words, this knighthood is totally bogus. This was confirmed and validated by the officially recognized Spanish King of Arms, Don Vicente De Cadenas y Vicent who wrote me from Madrid on November 29 2001. The Spanish Justice Department recommended I contact this man. So much for Mr. Boada’s honesty and credibility. He has again fallen on his sword and come up with egg on his face. No wonder this knighthood never has and never will be endorsed by the International Commission on Orders of Chivalry because it is a fake, the fabricated invention of a con man. (www.icocregister.org)
In an attempt to defend his client and partner, Roger Pitts-Tucker writes that “the Patriarch of Antioch has never been located in Madrid,” yet the document boldly declared that it was signed in Madrid on May 21, 2000, by the Patriarch of Antioch. It is written in Spanish. And yet it had British Feudal Investments, Ltd.’s London address on the tubular container as a return address, while it was sent from Lake Worth, Florida just a few miles from Boada’s Palm Beach, Florida office.
Contradictory, obviously! And what is Pitts-Tucker’s explanation for this? Being scared of the fact that this can be construed as mail fraud, Pitts-Tucker wrote, “. . . that documents were sent from Lake Worth only indicates our client [Boada] was in Florida on holiday. . . .” Which is totally ludicrous as Boada is a resident of the State of Florida, has a Florida State driver’s license and address and claimed a Palm Beach, Florida office on his old website for years. Not only does Boada lie, but so does his solicitor. (see " Crooked Solicitor1" and " Crooked Solicitor2")
Mr. Boada made some other false and outrageous claims in his book Instant Aristocracy on how he was a Herald of the Russian College of Arms and represented them and could get phoney noble titles recognized and authenticated by this prestigious organization that he also said was backed by the Russian government. I wrote this group and asked them about Boada’s wild claims. (see pp. 96-97, 99, 100-101)
Commander Valery Yegorov, the head of the “Russian College of Heralds” or “Collegium Heraldicum Russiae (CHR),” wrote to me how he was appalled that Mr. Boada advertised that he charged $4,750.00 for people to have the Russian College of Arms create and register a coat-of-arms for them when they (the CHR) only really charge a little over $300.00 per person. But ever eager to make a buck, Mr. Boada would gladly cheat you or bilk you out of thousands of dollars for what you could get for yourself for only a few hundred dollars. Nevertheless, that is the kind of man he is. With this kind of mindset, is it really any wonder that he sells fraudulent titles of nobility? And do you really believe Pitts-Tucker, his solicitor, was ignorant of the kind of man his partner is?
To go on, CDR Valery Yegorov, the head of CHR wrote to me on February 16, 2003, “ and said, “And I again and again repeat it [that since giving Boada an Honorary Diploma about five years ago for Miami, Florida, because he promised all kinds of business from his rich friends], for the last five years we have never got either any more information from Mr. Boada, nor a penny of his big money.”
On February 17, 2003, he wrote, "We at Collegium Heraldicum Russiae have never recognized on behalf of the Russian Government (or on our own, or anybody else's behalf) either the titles of Mr. Boada, or Patriarch of Antioch, or anybody else's titles at all." He also wrote: "The Collegium Heralicum Russiae has never claimed to be a part of, or established by, or be anyhow backed by the Russian Government." On his website he makes it clear that, "Russia, at present being a republic, does not officially recognize nobility titles" contrary to what Boada claimed. (www.armorial.org)
In other words, Boada was caught lying again. Mr. Yegorov was equally appalled that Mr. Boada claimed to be a “Herald of the Russian College of Arms” for which he stated that Mr. Boada must have “forged ‘some documents’” to make such a deceitful and crooked claim, and it bothered him that Mr. Boada would go so far as to claim that the CHR “could ever claim such ridiculous rights as to ‘confirm officially’ somebody`s titles or styles. An absolutely absurd idea!” But ever willing to stretch to the truth, or lie and deceive, Mr. Boada shows himself to be amazingly corrupt. To confirm what the Russian College of Arms thinks of all of this, simply contact Mr. Yegorov yourself at vyegorov@armorial.kirov.ru.
On page 138 of Mr. Boada's book entitled, Instant Aristocracy: How To Make It Into the Titled Aristocratic and Royal Ranks NOW!, you can see that Mr. Boada charges about $5,000 for a Spanish coat-of-arms. Yet last time I checked, it only cost about $300.00 to $500.00 if you deal directly with the officially recognized Spanish Heralds. Again, what kind of man does this kind of thing?–not a wholesome, upright, noble, good hearted, honest, straight-forward man. The kind of man who does this kind of thing obviously likes to bilk people out of their money. But this is Mr. Boada to a tee. It is his “MO,” signature or badge of dishonor and shame.
Some more harebrained lies concocted by Mr. Boada for various reasons will follow and be continued. For example, on July 9, 2002, Mr. Boada wrote to a Mr. Graft trying to discredit the Florida investigators, who were exposing him, that "to get a private investigators license in the State of Florida you simply go to the Dept. of Professional Regulation--it requires no special training and certainly no approval by the police or FBI. It is as easy to get as a dog groomers license." Anyone who checks can find out that this is an obvious misrepresentation of reality. (licgweb.doacs.state.fl.us/investigations/apply.html) To quote the State authorities: "When the application is received, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement and the Federal Bureau of Investigation perform a criminal history record check to determine if the applicant has a criminal history which will disqualify him or her from licensure." Mr. Boada lies whenever he can get away with it. And it is sad that some people fall for it. I did.
Earlier in an article on his website on March 7, 2002, Boada, being rattled about Mr. Branscum and Mr. Parker, the investigators, who would dare challenge or expose him, he wrote in his defense, "To become a 'Private Investigator' in Florida, which they tout so much, you can buy it through the tabloid newspapers such as the National Enquirer. . . .One does not need FBI clearance nor any kind of approval or real credentials to obtain this licensing much less education for it. It is just as easy to obtain a dog groomer's license or a tarot card occupational reader's license."
He also stated that he is "in the process of suing Branscum & Parker. . . ." And "they are indicted . . . and are being brought to trial. . . ." These gentlemen have never been sued, they have never been indicted or brought to trial. Boada is very bold in lying and making up things, but since he is so outrageous and overboard, he is easily caught. Both Mr. Branscum and Mr. Parker can be contacted on their websites through the internet.
It's also funny that Boada in his March 5, 2003 letter wrote, it "is a laughable and preposterous allegation" that Mr. Branscum, the private investigator, found that Boada was breaking securities laws in the State of Florida. And why is it laughable according to Boada? Because Roger Pitts-Tucker, Boada's English solicitor, said it is not a security violation in England. Not a security violation in England! But Mr. Branscum was talking about Florida law, not the law of Great Britain. He goes on to write that this "amounts to sheer stupidity and ignorance of British law." Sometimes I really wonder about Boada. He ridicules, mocks and scorns this man on something he wasn't even talking about. But Boada didn't even notice that Mr. Branscum was talking about the law in the United States in relation to securities, not British law. But to show culpability, rather than merely making an isolated mistake, Boada does it again later on in his letter. He wrote, "Oracle, once again, tries to hammer in the ridiculous notion that investment in a feudal title constitutes an investment in a 'security'. This is preposterous to anybody familiar with English law." Wow! I really don't know what to say about this goof up, except what is preposterous and laughable is that anyone, who ever read the report, would ever get the idea that Mr. Branscum was talking about anything other than the laws in the United States of America, not the laws of any other nation. (www.noblescams.com)
Now for something even more ridiculous. Mr. Boada in his March 5, 2003 letter claimed some pretty strange things. Ms. Lipman, the caseworker involved, was very distressed to learn that her letter was being used against me, especially saying that the Consumer Services Division had rejected my complaint. She explained that their office only offers mediation, not any kind of judgment or legal advice. When I also read to her what Mr. Boada said, she was even more dismayed. Mr. Boada really used his imagination here and took it to the point of absurdity. That is, he made the “wild assertion” or gross exaggeration that “the right honorable Commissioner dismissed [this one victim's] case as being wholly without merit and unsubstantiated.” Ms. Lipman said the Commissioner was never at any time involved and that no such determination is ever made on any case that they ever deal with. Despite Mr. Boada’s birdbrained allegation, they do not adjudicate any case that ever comes before them. Apparently he never got the idea that this was a mitigation service only. And Boada is way out of line to say that my case was “dismissed” or “rejected” or that Boada and Williams “were found innocent” by “the supreme authority in Florida . . . the Florida Commissioner of Consumer Affairs” or that I “lost [my] case before Florida’s highest advocacy body. . . .” No one wins or loses a case. They are either mediated satisfactorily or they are not. But Boada milks this lie for all it is worth. He states that “it is incumbent upon the accused to prove he is innocent,” which is false. It is only a mediation service. But in capital letters and in bold print, Boada glowingly says, ANTHONY BOADA AND MARK WILLIAMS PROVED THAT TEST. . . ,” that is, proved their innocence. This is way out.
But not only does he distorts their function, but gives them amazing investigative powers that no one in the United States has. He wrote that the Division of Consumer Services have “at their fingertips all alleged FBI, CIA, Internal Revenue Service and every other agency document they could have wanted–and got–and yet they have come up with absolutely nothing to incriminate BFI or its former Directors.” That’s astounding, since no law enforcement agency in the United States has such great control of all these important records, which is why President Bush is trying to revamp the system to protect the homeland. I do not know what planet Mr. Boada came from, but it must have been from far away. Mr. Boada isn’t very careful about whether something is true or not, just whether it sounds good. This is a very prominent feature or pattern. You will see this pattern over and over again.
The caseworker, Ms. Lipman, wrote to me on December 20, 2003:
Closing the complaint doesn't mean we made any determinations. All we do is informal mediation. We get your position in writing, that's what starts the complaint, and we ask the business for theirs. Once we get their position in writing we close the complaint. We don't make any judgments. We just try to see if we can help the two sides reach a compromise.
Sincerely,
Cheri Lipman
Ms. Lipman graciously invites anyone interested to clarify that the above claims made by Antony Boada represent a blatant and outrageous distortion of the truth. She can be reached through the contact information in the following website: www.800helpfla.com. This website explains what this group can and cannot do, one of those things is to refer the case to another department for investigation, which she did as she readily saw fraud on the part of Mr. Boada and Williams. I actually called up the Fraud Division of the Banking and Finance Department of the State of Florida and asked them shelve this case until I could be sure Mr. Boada is absolutely resolute and adamant about not proving the title is valid and legitimate. This they agreed to do. So instead of me looking bad, Boada looks bad and his case was referred, because if anyone lost, he did.
If you have been victimized by Mr. Boada, Mr. Williams or Mr. Pitts-Tucker, it’s time to make criminal complaints and sue them for the detestable things they have done to you and many others. It’s like the saying, “United we stand divided we fall.” Only when the authorities see that hundreds have actually been robbed and cheated, will they put a priority on this serious case of fraud and criminal misrepresentation. Go to “The Answer” for more information.
|