The Prussian titles of nobility Mr. Boada has sold are either beautifully true, and validly from the Imperial family, or they are ugly and detestable fakes, and his whole business is a mean, loathsome and detestable farce. Crimes of this nature are a cancer in the midst of society. It is a disease that should be stamped out and isolated. There is nothing noble and chivalrous about being a con man and a liar who robs and cheats people. But the point here is, there is no middle ground. It is either one way or the other. It is either true and beautiful or it is corrupt and rotten. But with three sections on deceptions and lies perpetrated by this scoundrel, Mr. Boada, three sections on various schemes and cons he created to rob people of their money, two sections on website misrepresentations, one on fake titles and one on proof of fraud, the evidence seems to weigh heavily against the idea that there is any truth whatsoever that these noble titles were legitimately from the people they claim they are from. That is, he had no lawful right to sell someone else's property or make things up and sell fakes and counterfeits.

I found out about six months after I bought the noble title from Mr. Boada in February or early March of 2000 that the title was completely and totally based on nothing more than Mr. Boada’s unreliable word. And since his word is about as untrustworthy as one can get, therefore the title's validity is on the same level. It has no backing. And it is a very good bet that the word of a con artist is not to be trusted or believed. Would you bet your very life and living on Mr. Boada’s good, wholesome and solid character? Would you pay good money (thousands of dollars) on one of Mr. Boada’s so-called “valid” titles–a noble title he supposedly stands by and never supports? Would you really do this? I mean really? Well, then, it is pretty obvious that a serious problem exists here.

Titles whose source cannot or will not verify their legitimacy will, in the end, wreck havoc on the social integrity of the holder. A person holding and maintaining a title that is unverifiable is likely to be listed in such ominous books and publications as the Dictionary of the False Nobility--a massive work that lists thousands of bogus titles and their purported holders. Such a listing is a great embarrassment and has destroyed many social careers begun on the wrong foot by obtaining a title of dubious legitimacy. Far from advancing one socially, such a title is likely to sink a person before he or she ever gets off the ground.

Do you think that Mr. Boada cares that he sold me such a title as described above?-- one that would “wreck havoc” and one “likely to sink a person before he or she ever gets off the ground?” Does he ever care about being fair and just in his dealings with his fellowman or is providing a good product or good customer service? I know he does not. And he has been extremely evasive about everything, even the most important thing of all--proof that the title is valid and authentic--my major and oft repeated request. Yet he wrote me on September 20, 2000, "I will not in any way evade your questions . . . ," but that is all he has ever done with me and many others.

If Mr. Boada and British Feudal Investments, Ltd. are going to be honorable and "stand by their product" as they have promised and emphatically declared on a December 16, 2002. That is, since they say that “BFI stands 100% by its products,” then they need to actually do so. To date, they have miserably failed in this vital part of any honest and upright business.

The challenge for Mr. Boada and British Feudal Investments, Ltd. boils down to the fact that they need to prove that they have sold legitimate titles of nobility rather than fakes. This is actually the law in England in regard to property. Noble titles are considered to be "incorporeal property." That is, according to the "Law of Property Act of 1969," they must prove that the root of a title is authentic and genuine, as it was represented to be, back at least fifteen years. But they are unwilling to abide by this law--a legal act of Parliament required of all involved in such property transactions.

Even though Mr. Boada wrote in his March 5, 2003 letter that "Roger Pitts-Tucker, conforming to the norms of English law, deduces title strictly back to the fifteen years required by English law," the fact is, they have never obeyed this law. The Trade Consult Group, Ltd. that they declared owned or had authority to sell the title is only three years old according to their November 2000 "statutory declaration." By law, they must show that this organization legitimately owns the title back to the last owner, which was Prince Louis Ferdinand of Prussia, the last uncontested heir to the throne of the Emperors of Germany and the last owner of the noble title in question. That is the law!

Yet Mr. Boada claims he has done no wrong. His defense of June 9, 2003 is his claim "that the type of proof you are seeking would place them [Boada and Pitts-Tucker] in violation of agreements with the original sellers." From his March 5, 2003 letter he wrote "that the purpose of the trust was to keep the identity of the individual members of the Hohenzollern family secret. This is their right and prerogative under international law." And on June 9, 2003, Ms. Montalvo, Esq., speaking for Boada and Williams, declared, "They have behaved as honorably as they can. They have kept the confidences of the Trust. . . ." "My clients firmly believe that they have done nothing wrong," even though they have disobeyed an important law of the land pertaining to the sale of property. The truth is, any corporation or trust, without exception, doing business in any country must obey the laws of that country or nation, or they have operated illegally. The Trade Consult Group, Ltd. has operated in the United Kingdom in violation of the law of the land.

But even more important is the fact that the Trade Consult Group, Ltd. was a "shelf corporation" purchased as an "international business corporation" by Antony Boada in the Republic of Seychelles as an after thought nine months after I bought my title. Yet he claimed this very company sold me the noble title when it was just sitting on a shelf waiting for someone to buy it at the time. (see: "Proof of Fraud.") Hence, three things stick out like a sore thumb from this investigation: (1) Boada bought the company, not the Imperial German House of Hohenzollern, (2) it was an international business corporation, not a trust as claimed, (3) it was not the company that sold me the title contrary to Boada's claim (he didn’t own it at the time–not until late October or early November of 2000), and (4) the "statutory declarations" or affidavits that declared otherwise under oath were obvious acts of perjury with the intention to deceive me into thinking Boada's promises of legitimacy were true when in fact they were ugly lies.

And if the Trade Consult Group, Ltd. of Seychelles was a trust as Boada claimed, then "the trustee" would have to be a "licensed trustee" and resident of the Republic of Seychelles, not a citizen of the United States like Boada is. (www.seychelles.net/siba/onsoff.html and www.siba.net) This is because "all Seychelles offshore Trusts are required by law to have a Trustee who is duly licensed in Seychelles." (e-mail from government business official from Seychelles) Again, this has to be done by a "licensed trustee" of this offshore sovereignty. That is the law of this country. The second website specified above has a list of all licensed trustees and Boada is not one of them.

Mr. Boada could have been a "co-trustee," but not "the trustee" in control and in charge of everything. Further evidence that he is not "the trustee" is the fact that Mr. Boada claims in his third Statutory Declaration that his "powers as trustee were granted in form absolute," with some minor stipulations. This kind of arrangement is simply not legally allowed in the law of the Republic of Seychelles. Therefore, Mr. Boada is not "the trustee" as claimed, and he has thus perpetuated another pernicious lie with the evil intent to beguile and deceive others.

Which brings up another serious and important question. And that is, "if 'control' is seen to be exercised from an onshore location [such as, Boada does in England and the United States for this so-called trust] then often the tax laws of such a location may well deem the offshore trust to be an onshore tax resident, etc.," and hence are liable to tax laws of that locality. (e-mail from government business official from Seychelles)

Has the Trade Consult Group, Ltd. paid appropriate business taxes? No, because if it did, it would have been registered, but it has made money doing business in England and the United States, hence, this will have to be investigated when things finally fully opened up with the FBI. Besides the Trade Consult Group, Ltd. has operated illegally and unlawfully since it was purchased in 2000 not having been registered in either country as required by the law of both lands. (see: www.companieshouse.co.uk and www.sunbiz.org/corpweb/inquiry/corinam.html) Boada apparently rarely obeys anyone's law, but acts like a criminal trying to dodge and hide from the law instead of abiding by it. This maneuver is a trick that many con men try to employ in order to avoid paying taxing. It is called tax evasion.

Now back to the original point, Boada's justification that he cannot violate a legal trust is poppycock, because there was no trust operating when I purchased, and certainly not through the Trade Consult Group, Ltd. which Boada (not the Imperial family) did not even own until nine months after the fact. That is, and this is really important, they have no legal protection under trust law to keep the identity of the so-called stockholders a secret. In fact, Mr. Boada, the so-called "trustee," hasn't kept the so-called Imperial Hohenzollern owners of his company in confidence himself for in the year 2001, on April 27th, Roger Pitts-Tucker stated that "this firm verified sight of four share certificates issued in the names of Hohenzollerns. . . ." If this is permissible, and obviously it is for they did it, then I suggest that Mr. Boada show these certificates to a mutually chosen confidential and objective third party, who could determine if these people are truly senior members of the Imperial and Royal House of Prussia as claimed, that is, "Prinz or Prinzessin von Preussen," if they are real people, are members of the trust (the Trade Consult Group, Ltd.) and have true authority from the real owners of the noble title to convey it to me through Mr. Antony Boada. That is, determine if everything is really on the up and up as the law requires in a way that preserves their confidentiality. This would satisfy the requirements of the law for proof and maintain family secrecy as well. I have, however, given this reasonable option to Boada and Pitts-Tucker over and over again for months.

1. Give me the names of four of the senior Imperial Hohenzollerns names (remember they must be “von Preussens” to be actual Imperial members) and their contact information and I can easily determine if they are the real McCoy or fraudulent names. I can sign a legal document ratified by a judge that their identity will remain confidential.

(1) the articles of incorporation showing the officers, stockholders–the [Imperial] Hohenzollerns of course, and you as one of the trustees. And if the family land trust is an offshore or European corporation, rather than a U.S. one, you, as one of the trustees, could easily obtain these papers directly or by calling the resident agent,

Last year, I explained to Mr. Boada that if he'd still rather make himself look guilty, like the bad guy, a con man or felon, a common criminal, then don’t find a way that would establish your innocence and prove yourself to be honest. Continue to stall, be evasive, try to distract everyone from the core issue of validity, continue to threaten and ignore and avoid and run away from your responsibility and sacred duty to be a man of truth and honor. I have challenged him many times to do what's right. But it all falls on deaf ears. For obviously, he doesn't give a damn.

He chose the underhanded path typical of those who are culpable and guilty. (see: "Reactions") He failed to prove himself and his company is above board, and has done so in defiance of the law, and in the face of unprecedented case law that clearly delineates how wrong he has been, and that he is worthy of blame and punishment for his illegal and unethical activities.

For example, in Stephen McPartlin -v- Robert Smith of February 19, 2001, Section 16, Central London county Court, ref: CHY99142, the Honourable Judge Roger Cooke demands that the following “must” be provided in a case of conveying of a noble title or incorporeal property, which should include Mr. Boada and his crooked solicitor. That is, “(i) that the manor [or noble title] exists at all, and why; (ii), who the manor [noble title] has been vested in [that is, who are the lawful owners and prior owners ,etc.]; (iii), how it comes to be vested in the vendor; (iv), [and] that the vendor and his predecessor have not conveyed it away. . . .” This whole process must be “open to inspection” and “rigorous research may be needed” to verify that the root of the noble title is authentic and accurate. But, what Judge Cooke decreed in interpreting the Law of Property Act 1969 has never been complied with. But it could be. And that is the challenge for Mr. Boada, Roger Pitts-Tucker and British Feudal Investments. In other words, Mr. Boada could prove himself to be an honest and honorable man if he wanted too. In other words, the question is not, could he obey the law and do what is right? The question is, will he do so? He obviously should. And that is the challenge.

There is a saying, “where there’s a will, there’s a way.” The problem is, there is no will, no desire to make things right. Mr. Boada and his solicitor are not very nice people. Even though many alternatives and options to accomplish this were presented to Mr. Boada and Mr. Pitts-Tucker over the years, such that, if they wanted to find a way, they could have, they have always declined. It appears they would rather buy me off or shut me up. Why?--because they cannot prove they run a legitimate business.

The point is, Boada could easily end all his problems and refute his many critics simply by providing irrefutable and verifiable proof that his Prussian noble titles are validly from the Imperial and Royal Family as claimed. Why doesn't he? Why would he rather remain in contempt of the law? Obviously, if he wanted to be a law-abiding man, he would abide by it. To come to an understand why he will never come clean and do what is the honorable and right, see "Proof of Fraud" and "Fake Titles."

For law enforcement authorities, I will gladly provide copies of all the correspondence, names of victims and contact information. But a greater source of evidence, what I would term as a gold mine of evidence and expert witness exists with Burke's Peerage, the Westphalen Heraldry Society of Germany, and the Lord of Lyons office which can show the titles sold by Boada don't exist or someone else already actually owns them. Proving fraud would be enjoyable and a piece of cake with the assistance of these groups. And the more this is investigated, the more criminal charges will discovered, such as tax evasion, mail fraud and a host of other things especially on the part of Mr. Boada and his illegally unregistered company, that was legally dissolved in April of 2002, but still called themselves "Limited."

This ought to be a very interesting case and one that is as easy to prove, even as easy as rolling off a log. Practically any jury would immediately see through Mr. Boada's lies and Pitts-Tucker's shallow claim of being an innocent bystander supporting Boada's every move. In fact, it may make those involved very well-known as the public would love to heard about this. It would make a very interesting story and good press. But more important than anything else, it would be a great and important service to mankind to stop the marauders and con men already preying upon innocent people throughout the earth especially from the shores of Great Britain where these schemes seem to be thriving and mushrooming thanks to the examples of Boada and Pitts-Tucker. I look forward to these villains being brought to justice. Mr. Boada and Pitts-Tucker being are among the worst and most vile of the pack. They have probably hurt more people than anyone else in the history of this kind of crime, and as such, have left an ugly mark upon humanity that cries out for justice. Remember, "all that is needed for the forces of evil to win is for good men to do nothing."

If you have been victimized by Mr. Boada, Mr. Williams or Mr. Pitts-Tucker, it’s time to make criminal complaints and sue them for the detestable things they have done to you and many others. It’s like the saying, “United we stand divided we fall.” Only when the authorities see that hundreds have actually been robbed and cheated, will they put a priority on this serious case. Go to “The Answer” for more information.