|
Justice is one of the greatest and most beautiful things next to life itself and the glorious principle of freedom.
This website is dedicated to bring some very despicable men to justice.
|
Deceptions1
A Twisted Mentality Consistently Lies:
If you have been victimize by any of these despicable men, Antonio A. Boada, Mark T. Williams or Roger Pitts-Tucker, go to "The Answer" and learn how you can join in a class action suit against them.
*************************************
In April and May of 2003, Mr. Boada wrote that everything against him is “a tonnage of crap,” or “unfounded accusations.” And that he had provided “a mountain of evidence” as to the validity of my title, which is sheer hogwash, since he never provided a shred of evidence that it was true, but he has provided ample proof that he is involved in widespread fraud all over the earth.
Mr. Boada counts on the fact that few people will check out his claims and that he will get away with murder in effect. To start off, Mr. Antony Boada proclaimed in his letter of March 5, 2003, that he “was granted the right to the use of the title of Marquess of Alessio by His Majesty King Leka the First of the Albanians in 1983.” So the royal family of Albania was contacted and asked about this spurious claim. Her Majesty Queen Susan of Albania, King Leka I’s royal consort wrote back on April 16, 2003, saying, “His Majesty vaguely recalls Mr. Boada writing to His Majesty many years ago, requesting that His Majesty recognize his title of “Marquess of Alessio.” His Majesty replied that, He had never heard of this title and under our Constitution no titles other than those held by the Royal Family are legitimate.” Hence, Mr. Boada has been fraudulently claiming a worthless title for years that has no merit--it is a violation of common decency to masquerade around the world that he is something he is not.
Another classic example of a Boada deception is as follows. In his letter of March 5, 2003, Mr. Boada claims to be the “Baron of Barrymore.” But, according to the book, The New Extinct Peerage 1884-1971 written by L. G. Pine and published in 1973 by the Genealogy Publishing Company of Baltimore, Maryland, this title became extinct on February 22, 1925. (p. 23) This title was never revived by the Monarchy because it is a title that belongs to the Republic of Ireland over which the Monarch’s of England no longer have any sovereignty or hereditary claim. Hence, it is extinct or dead and will remain so forever. Mr. Boada’s claim to this title is not only silly, but absurd. But for a con man, like Boada, a commoner, who now claims to be royalty or anything he wants to be like the Sovereign Head of the extinct Royal House of Lusignan, he can do anything. (see www.baronage.co.uk/2002d/bradford2.html) He'd gladly claim to be Tinker Bell or Peter Pan if it would empower him to sell phoney titles of nobility.
Even though this title is extinct and cannot be rehabilitated or sold, Mr. Boada claimed in a letter of March 5, 2003 that he “bought the title of Baron of Barrymore from the Earl of Shannon in 1992/1993. . . .” But the truth is, the Right Honorable Earl of Shannon and his son deny ever selling a title or having anything to do with this scoundrel at any time. We have a letter from them. Mr. Boada will not be able to produce a valid bill of sale from them. He has no defense against this outright lie. Mr. Boada’s strategy as a con man has long been to bet on the idea that no one will check things out. And if they did, no one will ever bring him to justice especially because he has a crooked, highly respected solicitor to derail them. He may soon have a rude awakening.
Another crowning achievement is Boada's claim to be the Lord or Baron of Chafford which is just another farce. There is no such title recorded in any of Burke's Peerage publications nor even in the Complete Peerage--an exhaustive work recording all past or present peerage titles. According to the reference books, no such title ever existed, period. Apparently, what we have is a con man with a phoney, make believe title impersonating nobility. But he is an imposter to the core.
Mr. Boada claims in the "statutory declarations" under oath that he set to me and many others that he graduated with a law degree from the Modern University of Lisbon. Yet this university has made it clear that this is a tall tale–a total, absolute falsehood. I will quote Maria Joao Juncerio of the Academic Department who wrote on June 18, 2001, “I confirm that Mr. Antony Boada also known as Antony Boada Carataya has never been a student in this University, and therefore has never graduated or received a degree of any kind from Universidade Moderna.” Are you getting the picture of what kind of man this Mr. Boada is?
We have a copy of a letter that Mr. Boada wrote to a Mr. Williams, one of his many victims, that involves something akin to “unlawful meddling” or close to being potential “witness tampering” or could even be considered as some kind of “obstruction of justice.” All of which are loathsome and unprofessional acts on the part of Mr. Boada. He acts much like his partner Mr. Pitts-Tucker who used a type of “blackmail” as a way to scare one other victim into submission via a act of cowardly “intimidation.” It is a sad day unless justice can take its full course against these guilty parties.
In this unsigned letter from “British Feudal Investments, Ltd.,” Boada threatens myself “and his party, upon whom we are bringing to bear the full brunt of the criminal law . . . . Our case is against him–and anyone who cooperates with him. . . .” In other words, don't you dare support and be involved with him or we will go after you with the full brunt of the law. And there’s more, Mr. Boada tells this man to do what he says and change or else. And what is that else–he, that is, you'll be “sued due to your allegiance and co-operation with Mr. . .” myself. Sued for what? Providing evidence against him that is clear and unmistakable.
This is not professional behavior. The is not the kind of behavior that fits with a man of high ethical standards or decency. This is harassment and abuse--behavior that is more agreeable to that of a bully or a thug or the criminal element of society. It is not the standard expected of an attorney as Boada professes to be. But then again, it should be remembered that even the university, he is supposed to have graduated from, denounces him. That is, Mr. Boada makes up a lot of things. The Modern University of Lisbon has absolutely no record of him ever being a student there, much less a graduate.
Mr. Boada’s crooked letter reflects a detestable character. It is full of falsehoods, intimidation, libel and frankly some things that make me wonder if the man is mentally unbalanced. I will go over several of the more important points:
1. Mr. Boada threatens Mr. Williams with the idea that he would identify himself with a child pornographer, if he cooperates or joins with me in attempting to bring him, Mr. Boada, to justice. Well, actually all of us are working independently, so this doesn’t really apply. The only real connection we have is that we were all victims of Mr. Boada’s frauds. But pestering and harassing people with threats is totally wrong and yet it is a fairly common and contemptible practice quite typical of Mr. Boada.
And since the registration information shows that the second victim does not, in fact, own or operate the pornographic site in question, then Mr. Boada demonstrates he is guilty of defamation and libel for publishing this bold faced, ugly lie.
And whether or not this second victim owns and operates such a website has nothing to do with the merits of his case. Boada likes to use distraction and evasive techniques to avoid the critical point that he has robbed and cheated a number of people. In other words, he is not interested in what is fair or in compensating his victims, he just wants to stop all action that would bring him to justice. This is a very self-centered approach. But what is worse, he uses underhanded means to get his way–both before the crime and afterwards by bullying and intimidating his victims.
2. Mr. Boada sometimes acts like a nutcase sometimes. The following is one of those instances. He makes the absurd allegation that if Mr. Williams joins with me, he will be guilty of credit card fraud. Now where did he get such an idiotic idea? Does that mean if I assaulted an old lady and took her purse that Mr. Williams would be guilty of taking the old lady’s purse as well and therefore would be a “co-defendant” for this particular kind of crime? What planet was Mr. Boada born on. In other words, he is saying that anyone who cooperates with me is in providing evidence against Mr. Boada is guilty of assault and taking a purse from an old lady? This is pretty mixed up. How can Boada get so far afield? I have no idea, but this is way out–irrational and looney. Nevertheless, he does it again later on in the letter. Remember this is a man who claims to be an attorney.
In regard to Boada's charge. The truth is, credit card fraud was committed against me, not the other way around. But whether I did or did not is immaterial anyway. What really matters is, are Boada and Pitts-Tucker going to continue to be crooked and unethical or are they going to come clean and do what is honorable and right? This is the real issue.
3. Mr. Boada thinks to speak for me and say what we plan to do. He’s afraid to let it be known that someone as internationally known, recognized and well-respected as Guy Stair Sainty is willing to be an “expert witness” against him.
4. Mr. Williams informs me that article 14 of STEPHEN McPARTIN -v- ROBERT SMITH of 19 February 2001 is totally irrelevant to this case except that it states that proof of validity must be provided. And who cares if the man specified in that case may or may not have been “close” to committing fraud. The point is, Boada committed fraud and sold me and many others noble titles that he had no right to sell, because his offshore corporation, the Trade Consult Group, Inc. is nothing but a front or facade with no legitimate bond or legal connection to the Imperial and Royal House of Prussia.
5. Boada again threatens Mr. Williams with a lawsuit if he chooses to ally himself with me or any others who dare go against him. Is this appropriate, ethical and professional behavior, or is it really just being a bully and using intimidation or scare tactics?
The reason Mr. Boada is threatening or trying to frighten this man is he knows he sold him a nonexistent title, and he should be afraid of the consequences, because they will come sooner or later, but the point is he will have his day in court.
6. Boada again threatens this Mr. Williams with being a “co-defendant” for someone else’s crimes. Does he really think that the law supports the idea of making one man guilty of something someone else did when he had nothing to do with it? How harebrained and radical can one get? This is very close to being cuckoo. But here it is in black and white. It says a lot about what kind of man Mr. Boada is and how far out he can go.
Instead of putting so much effort into defending himself in such questionable and really corny ways, why doesn’t he just prove himself innocent of guilt and end all these problems? The answer is obvious, he can’t prove himself to be an honorable businessman, because he is simply not an honest businessman. You cannot prove that fantasy is real anymore than you can prove that gravity doesn’t exist. Boada shows himself to be as guilty as sin.
7. Contrary to Mr. Boada’s assertion, my attorney has not abandoned me, I haven’t lie to him, nor did I lie to the investigator, and I don’t owe him any money. All of these are groundless assertions. But Boada loves to make things up. But it must be remembered that he is not just a fantasy man, he is a malicious liar who doesn’t play by any of the normal rules of decency and honor.
8. Under “Question to you,” Boada suggests that this victim will be “lumped together with the rather infamous”–the bad people of the world, if he sides with those who want to bring him to justice. He then suggests that the website “www.internationalscams.com” will change everything and make him see “reality.” This website, by the way, no longer exists. And this website doesn’t change things, well, he will be “sued for [his] allegiance and co-operating with Mr. . .” myself.
So instead of letting the case be tried on its own merits, or providing to Mr. Williams that he is an honest man, Mr. Boada must interfere, intimidate, bully and threaten his victims. He is not a very nice man.
In Mr. Boada's March 5, 2003 letter, which is full of half-truths, distortions and outright lies, and will be referred to over and over again in the next two chapters on Deceptions, he wrote that, "It can be easily and forensically concluded that Oracle [the investigator or company who wrote an illuminating report on Boada, see www.noblescams.com] has falsified all of its so-called 'scanned document images'. . . ." So I checked it out and everyone was not only an exact and perfect quote, but the type and spacing were identical with no variance from the originals. Mr. Boada obviously forgot that the Law Society has copies of all the originals. This was a stupid defense ploy to try to play on the Law Society. It just made him look bad.
There are a lot of other irregularities and oddities in Mr. Boada's letter like labeling Prince Peter Michael Hohenzollern, a nonexistent, make believe man that Boada invented to deceive one of his victims, as "HRH" or His Royal Highness. (see "Proof of Fraud" for more information on this imaginary, phoney) He called him "HRH Prince von Hohenzollern" on page seven, when even the head and highest member of the Hohennzollern family (not the Imperial Hohenzollerns who are "von Preussens," but the junior, non sovereign line), Prince Friederich Wilhelm of Hohenzollern is "HSH" or His Serene Highness--a lesser prenominal title. Mr. Boada being a self-professed or self-proclaimed expert in all laws and customs of European noble titles and royalty should have known better. And if he was an expert, he would never had presumed to give him a title to which this man would not be allowed, if he were real.
Other problems include Boada's false allegation, an act of libel and defamation, that Guy Stair Stainty, a distinguished and renown expert on nobility and royalty, was expelled from the Order of St. Lazarus of Jerusalem when, in fact, he was never even a member of that group. And wrongfully accusing James Algrant of embezzling money from this order, when he never handled money. But was their historian and became disillusioned and quit because of major historical discrepancies that eventually resulted in the Order's loss of certification as a true order of knighthood by the International Commission on Orders of Chivalry. (www.icocregister.org) But Boada doesn't care about truth. He says whatever he wants to say.
I will now continue to provide more evidence of Boada’s base and conniving character, which Pitts-Tucker, his solicitor, must have discerned if he had eyes to see, or were open to the evidence. Anyway, Mr. Boada claims in his letter of March 5, 2003, he can produce “letters patent of knighthood and letters patent as Grand Prior [for Holland] of the Order of St. Lazarus of Jerusalem, signed by Prince Francisco, and which clearly guarantee his standing in the Order . . . .” Yet I have a letter dated October 24, 2000 from the Grand Chancellor of the whole Order, who has access to all of its records, and who is, in addition, the personal secretary of the present Grand Master, HRH Don Francisco de Borbon y Escasany, himself. In this letter, under the official letterhead of the Grand Master, R. S. Attard states, “I confirm that this person [Antony Boada] has nothing to do with the Military and Hospitaller Order of Saint Lazarus of Jerusalem.”
Now who’s telling the truth–Mr. Boada, the con man, or the Grand Chancellor of the Order who is also the secretary of the whole Order? Later, on June 28, 2001, this distinguished gentleman from Malta wrote me and said, “I found out that he [Antony Boada] was selling the Order [he had no right to do this, but being a con man he couldn’t help it] from Holland, I stopped his activities immediately. He was later operating from Florida, USA however I reported to our attorneys to take appropriate action.” From this, I would assume that if Mr. Boada were actually a member, he was probably expelled and rightly so. He should never have used his high office, if he really had one, to fraudulently take the money that should have gone to the charities of this Order instead of into his pockets. This is probably one of the worst types of theft, there is. But Mr. Boada has no shame because he has no conscience. This is Boada’s stock and trade. He is a con artist and a thief. He makes his living this way. Mr. Attard, the Grand Chancellor, is the man who told my wife two times on the phone that Mr. Boada was a “fraud.” This prominent man can be reached by mail, fax or phone to confirm the above. He is not very fond of Mr. Boada to say the least.
The Military and Hospitaller
Order of Saint Lazarus of Jerusalem
Office of the Grand Master
Grand Chancellor R. S. Attard
67, Sir Arturo Mercieca Street
Sliema SLM 10
Malta G.C.
Phone: (+356) 313005, 346790, 220354, 233664
Fax Office: (+356) 339354, 249037
Tel/Fax: Residence: (+356) 431060
If you have been victimized by Mr. Boada, Mr. Williams or Mr. Pitts-Tucker, it’s time to make criminal complaints and sue them for the detestable things they have done to you and many others. It’s like the saying, “United we stand divided we fall.” Only when the authorities see that hundreds have actually been robbed and cheated, will they put a priority on this serious case. Go to “The Answer” for more information.
|